Junkyard Find: 1949 Plymouth Special Deluxe Sedan

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

I’ve been living in Colorado for 12 years now, and I’ve found that the junkyards here have plenty of both the rust-free Japanese cars you’d find in California yards and the late-model Detroit machinery of the Midwest yards (the liquor stores here also stock the watery yellow beers of both the Pacific Northwest and the Upper Midwest, great news if you’re throwing a Denver party that requires both Rainier and Hamm’s). The one thing that really sets Colorado car graveyards apart from those elsewhere (besides all the Scouts and edge-case 4WD cars) is the huge numbers of pre-1960 American vehicles that end up in the U-Wrench-It-type yards here. Here’s the latest, a 1949 Plymouth Special Deluxe sedan in a big self-service yard between Denver and Cheyenne.

In fact, that yard has three Chrysler products of the same era in the inventory right now, parked side-by-side. Over in the GM section, they’ve got a pair of 1940s Chevrolets plus a Frazer. I see the same thing in the other Front Range yards, too.

I think the reason so few of these pre-1960 cars get intercepted and rescued by enthusiasts is that the Front Range is something of a car-freak island, thanks to geography. To the west, it’s a 10-hour tow over one forbidding mountain range to get to Salt Lake City and a 20-hour tow over two ranges to get to the big West Coast population centers. To the north and south, it’s sparsely-populated desert for the most part, and your tow to the big Midwestern cities will take a couple of days. Everyone here who wants project cars has all they can handle, and it’s not worth hauling a rough 70-year-old Detroit sedan to a place where it will be worth $900. So, cars like today’s Junkyard Find end up in The Crusher, sooner or later.

This one has a fairly solid body, but it’s very rough inside.

Can you smell the rodent poop, decaying horsehair, and High Plains desert dust through your screen?

With the single-digit humidity and the high-UV solar radiation you get a mile up, the interiors of cars stored outdoors turn to powder as various critters raise generations of families inside. At least there’s no mildew and no snakes hiding inside water-filled old tires.

If the windows are broken or open, the winter snow gets in and rots the floors.

Plymouth was riding high in 1949, with an all-new design finally replacing the prewar models (Ford and GM had introduced their postwar designs a year earlier). The Plymouth still had a split windshield, but so did most of the competition that year. Better than a half-million ’49s rolled out of Plymouth showrooms, with about half of those being Special Deluxe sedans.

Chevrolet topped a million cars sold in 1949, as did Ford, but the car division named after a rope company was still a major player that year.

Chevrolet had been putting overhead-valve straight-six engines in cars since the 1920s, but Ford and Chrysler were still flathead devotees in 1949 ( Ford introduced an OHV six for 1952, while Chrysler didn’t dump the valve-in-block design for cars until the 1960 model year).

If this is the original engine (which is possible, though nowhere near certain), it’s a 218-cubic-incher rated at 97 horsepower. Chrysler used this type of Carter carburetor into the 1970s.

The only transmission available in the ’49 Plymouths was a three-on-the-tree column-shift manual. If you wanted a heater, dual sun visors, turn signals, or radio, that stuff cost extra. Hey, if you wanted bells and whistles in 1949, you bought a Dodge!

These cars weren’t luxurious, but they were cheap and reliable transportation. The sticker price on this one started at $1,629 (about $19,840 in 2022 dollars), while the stripped-to-bare-minimum short-wheelbase 1949 Plymouth Deluxe Business Coupe sold for just $1,371 ($16,700 now). Those prices were a bit cheaper than the corresponding Ford and Chevrolet models, though you could get the wretched Crosley two-door sedan for only $866 ($10,545 today) and a new Volkswagen Beetle for $1,280 ($15,590 in 2022).

For links to more than 2,200 additional Junkyard Finds, please visit the Junkyard Home of the Murilee Martin Lifestyle Brand™.

[Images by the author]

Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 12 comments
  • Fred I would get the Acura RDX, to replace my Honda HR-V. Both it and the CRV seats are uncomfortable on longer trips.
  • RHD Now that the negative Nellies have chimed in...A reasonably priced electric car would be a huge hit. There has to be an easy way to plug it in at home, in addition to the obvious relatively trickle charge via an extension cord. Price it under 30K, preferably under 25K, with a 200 mile range and you have a hit on your hands. This would be perfect for a teenager going to high school or a medium-range commuter. Imagine something like a Kia Soul, Ford Ranger, Honda CR-V, Chevy Malibu or even a Civic that costs a small fraction to fuel up compared to gasoline. Imagine not having to pay your wife's Chevron card bill every month (then try to get her off of Starbuck's and mani-pedi habits). One car is not the solution to every case imaginable. But would it be a market success? Abso-friggin-lutely. And TTAC missed today's announcement of the new Mini Aceman, which, unfortunately, will be sold only in China. It's an EV, so it's relevant to this particular article/question.
  • Ajla It would. Although if future EVs prove relatively indifferent to prior owner habits that makes me more likely to go used.
  • 28-Cars-Later One of the biggest reasons not to purchase an EV that I hear is...that they just all around suck for almost every use case imaginable.
  • Theflyersfan A cheaper EV is likely to have a smaller battery (think Mazda MX-30 and Mitsubishi iMEV), so that makes it less useful for some buyers. Personally, my charging can only take place at work or at a four-charger station at the end of my street in a public lot, so that's a crapshoot. If a cheaper EV was able to capture what it seems like a lot of buyers want - sub-40K, 300+ mile range, up to 80% charging in 20-30 minutes (tops) - then they can possibly be added to some lists. But then the issues of depreciation and resale value come into play if someone wants to keep the car for a while. But since this question is asking person by person, if I had room for a second car to be garaged (off of the street), I would consider an EV for a second car and keep my current one as a weekend toy. But I can't do a 50K+ EV as a primary car with my uncertain charging infrastructure by me, road trips, and as a second car, the higher insurance rates and county taxes. Not yet at least. A plug in hybrid however is perfect.
Next