Chevy Bolt Fire Fix Allegedly Finalized

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

The Chevrolet Bolt has evolved from being General Motors’ superstar EV, radiating optimism for the company’s ambitious electrification strategy, to a public relations nightmare in relatively short order. While sales of the hatchback (and EUV) actually skyrocketed in Q2 of 2021, thanks largely to a diminished production output from the same period in 2020, shoppers are becoming aware of the fire reports and prolonged recall campaign that followed.

Another chapter has been added to that story, with GM now convinced that this will be the conclusion of the dejected tale. On Monday, the manufacturer issued an announcement that batteries for the Bolt had resumed production. But they won’t be coming out of the South Korean facility owned by LG Chem that’s been alleged as ground zero for the relevant defects. GM has instead elected to source the units from Michigan while LG improves quality assurance with the automaker peering over its shoulder, hopeful that customers will someday be able to use their car normally. Sadly, that moment still looks to be several months away.

“We’re grateful for the patience of owners and dealers as we work to advance solutions to this recall,” stated Doug Parks, GM executive vice president, Global Product Development, Purchasing and Supply Chain. “Resuming battery module production is a first step and we’ll continue to work aggressively with LG to obtain additional battery supply. In addition, we’re optimistic a new advanced diagnostic software will provide more convenience for our customers.”

Software updates are frequently a dead-end for recall campaigns and often feel like they’re just a way for automakers to buy time before they have to start replacing physical components. GM has already issued a few for the fire-prone Bolt and this new one doesn’t seem all that different from previous editions focused on monitoring for thermal runaway. But it’s supposed to be more comprehensive and “detect specific abnormalities that might indicate a damaged battery in Bolt EVs and EUVs.”

Customers will have to take their vehicles back to the dealership if they’re to have it installed. Meanwhile, “further diagnostics software” will be used to make it so owners can charge their vehicles normally again. The manufacturer currently recommends owners limit their state of charge, not deplete range below 70 miles, and ensure that it’s never left unattended or parked anywhere near something that might get swept up in a surprise fire. But service centers won’t be ready to begin the installation process for another 60 days.

Depending upon when your vehicle was assembled, battery availability could be even further away. GM wants to prioritize battery replacement for Bolts that were “manufactured during specific build timeframes where GM believes battery defects appear to be clustered” and allegedly has a process for notifying those customers before anyone else. While few are likely to be interested in waiting around to see whether or not their vehicle is the next one to catch fire, the new units do come with an extended 8-year/100,000-mile limited warranty and won’t be manufactured in South Korea.

From GM:

LG battery plants in Holland and Hazel Park, Michigan, have resumed production. In addition, LG is adding capacity to provide more cells to GM. As a result, replacement battery modules will begin shipping to dealers as soon as mid-October.

The root cause of the rare circumstances that could cause a battery fire is two manufacturing defects known as a torn anode and a folded separator, both of which need to be present in the same battery cell.

LG has implemented new manufacturing processes and has worked with GM to review and enhance its quality assurance programs to provide confidence in its batteries moving forward. LG will institute these new processes in other facilities that will provide cells to GM in the future.

A lot of this sounds familiar, leaving us a little pessimistic. But the fires aren’t so common that we would call this a total disaster. General Motors experienced far worse during the ignition switch recall that forced it to take responsibility for 124 deaths. But the Bolt situation calls into question the entire premise of EVs since fires typically occurred overnight while vehicles were charging at people’s homes. This will have lingering consequences for the brand and alternative-energy vehicles on the whole.

But there is a silver lining. With the current batteries taking a beating in the media, the manufacturer can now tout its upcoming Ultium batteries (still built by LG Chem) as not having a history of spontaneous combustion.

[Images: General Motors]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 32 comments
  • Dwford Dwford on Sep 22, 2021

    So with GM prioritizing the most at risk cars ( I am assuming the 2017-2019 cars), it could be months before the 2020 Bolt I was about to buy right before the stop sale gets fixed. Super. Seems like I would need a bigger discount to keep waiting

  • Imagefont Imagefont on Sep 22, 2021

    I just drove past a Jeep Wrangler Unlimited, brand new, burned down to the axles. Even the fire were completely burned away, I’ve never seen a car so completely consumed by fire. It was a 20 minute delay on the freeway. All this BS about ICE cars being just as fire prone as EV’s is a red herring and false equivalence. ICE vehicles burn because they’ve been damaged or they’re very old and neglected. That description covers the vast majority of ICE vehicles that catch fire. EV’s burn because they’re new, undamaged and being used and charged as prescribed by the manufacturer. It’s due to hidden defects and risk associated with a large, agreeeivy charged battery pack of uncertain quality. Despite the misdirection, ICE vehicles are not prone to catching fire for no reason, but EV’s are.

  • Rna65689660 2015 Ford Edge V6 AWD: 176k miles. One set of Cooper tires, rear brakes, rear struts. Oil change every 10k miles. 1 battery, trans and coolant flush at 100k.2013 MINI Cooper S 6mt: 117k miles. Oil change every 10k, 4 sets tires, 3 sets brakes, rotors twice, 2 windshields,1 HVAC rheostat, 1 cv boot cover. This week pcv valve with valve cover and coolant thermostat, lower radiator hose.The MINI gets driven harder.
  • Zipper69 Is Toyota trying to squeeze into a space between the mid and full size trucks, both ICE and hybrid?That market can only be sliced so thin until it's a continuous, amorphous mélange and a confused market and irritated buyers.
  • FreedMike I have it on good authority that Subaru asked Subaru buyers what they wanted out of the Legacy, and they came up with the following cryptic mission: "So outdoorsy I can feel the poison ivy." Subsequently, they tried to add at least 10 square yards of black plastic cladding to the side of the Legacy, creating the Legacy "Lost In The Woods" edition, but the supplier pulled out, thus sealing the Legacy's fate. RIP.
  • Zipper69 Speedmaster may be feeling their collar a little here...
  • Zipper69 So, my '94 Ranger doesn't cut it?
Next