Abandoned History: The Early 2000s WiLL Project, for The Youths (Part IV)

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis

The WiLL branding project in early 2000s Japan was intended to excite and interest younger consumers with stylish products, all of which were marketed as WiLL. At the pinnacle of unique WiLL offerings were three different small Toyotas: The first two were the unpopular and unsuccessful retro-French themed Vi, and the modern-looking, popular, and unsuccessful VS.

Around the middle of VS production, Toyota just knew there had to be a part of the market they hadn’t reached yet and reintroduced the idea of the Vi with a polar opposite stylistic direction. This is the Cypha.

WiLL Cypha debuted in 2001 and was originally called VC to match in nomenclature with the other two WiLL cars. The name was revised quickly to Cypha, and the hatchback entered production in September 2002. Its unique name was a combination of “cyber” and “phaeton,” though one would be forgiven for thinking it was a random amalgam.

When launched, Cypha was meant to be a representation of the future, though that should probably be all in capital letters. Bulbous and upright, the Cypha looked like a big plastic helmet from most angles. Tail lamps were up high astride the rear window, and headlamps were down low, eight in quantity, and stacked vertically in a rounded rectangular housing. Very few flat surfaces occurred in Cypha’s design, and indeed the visual theming effect inside and out was “This is as round as possible.” However, Toyota did state the interior of the Cypha was inspired by a super-modern electronic: the karaoke machine. I can sort of see a boom box, at least.

Underneath, the hatchback was based on the Vitz much like the Vi sedan. Unlike the Vi, buyers were given options on engines and drive trains. Standard was the 1.3-liter Vitz engine, but the 1.5-liter used in the VS was also available. Cypha was the only WiLL where all-wheel drive was optional.

Cypha implemented a new feature from Toyota called G-Book (Gazoo Mobility Service). Early in its development, G-Book included telematics and computer or cell phone linking to provide service information, multimedia, and basic navigation features. But for Cypha in particular, G-Book was part of a pay-as-you-go marketing campaign.

At the customer’s option, Toyota offered an alternative to traditional purchasing or leasing methods: pay by the kilometer. There was no monthly payment on the lease; customers were tracked by G-Book and their mileage use was reported back to Toyota. At the end of each month, a bill was sent based on that month’s driving distance. Whenever a customer was finished with their Cypha, simply take it back to the local dealer with no further obligation.

The unusual variable payment method didn’t increase Cypha’s appeal, nor did its intense “Future Now!” styling. Production ran through February of 2005. By then Cypha’s stablemate VS had been discontinued for nearly a year.

Toyota was finished with WiLL, and all that remains of the project today are a few office products with discrete WiLL branding. Remember those youthful employees of the new Virtual Venture Company within Toyota? Well, there was exactly one press release about VVC in 1998 – safe assumption those folks returned to their regular work under Toyota management’s watchful eye.

But the influence on Toyota of WiLL and youth-oriented marketing should not be underestimated, as we’ll see in the next installment of Abandoned History.

[Images: Toyota]

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 5 comments
  • Syke Syke on Sep 27, 2021

    Ugly enough to be a Citroen. Which means I’d want one.

  • Sckid213 Sckid213 on Sep 28, 2021

    I get strong Suzuki Aerio vibes. Not surprising considering they came out around the same time as these strange Will cars.

  • Ltcmgm78 It depends on whether or not the union is a help or a hindrance to the manufacturer and workers. A union isn't needed if the manufacturer takes care of its workers.
  • Honda1 Unions were needed back in the early days, not needed know. There are plenty of rules and regulations and government agencies that keep companies in line. It's just a money grad and nothing more. Fain is a punk!
  • 1995 SC If the necessary number of employees vote to unionize then yes, they should be unionized. That's how it works.
  • Sobhuza Trooper That Dave Thomas fella sounds like the kind of twit who is oh-so-quick to tell us how easy and fun the bus is for any and all of your personal transportation needs. The time to get to and from the bus stop is never a concern. The time waiting for the bus is never a concern. The time waiting for a connection (if there is one) is never a concern. The weather is never a concern. Whatever you might be carrying or intend to purchase is never a concern. Nope, Boo Cars! Yeah Buses! Buses rule!Needless to say, these twits don't actual take the damn bus.
  • MaintenanceCosts Nobody here seems to acknowledge that there are multiple use cases for cars.Some people spend all their time driving all over the country and need every mile and minute of time savings. ICE cars are better for them right now.Some people only drive locally and fly when they travel. For them, there's probably a range number that works, and they don't really need more. For the uses for which we use our EV, that would be around 150 miles. The other thing about a low range requirement is it can make 120V charging viable. If you don't drive more than an average of about 40 miles/day, you can probably get enough electrons through a wall outlet. We spent over two years charging our Bolt only through 120V, while our house was getting rebuilt, and never had an issue.Those are extremes. There are all sorts of use cases in between, which probably represent the majority of drivers. For some users, what's needed is more range. But I think for most users, what's needed is better charging. Retrofit apartment garages like Tim's with 240V outlets at every spot. Install more L3 chargers in supermarket parking lots and alongside gas stations. Make chargers that work like Tesla Superchargers as ubiquitous as gas stations, and EV charging will not be an issue for most users.
Next