QOTD: Care to Rank 11 Generations of the Chevrolet Suburban? (Part I)

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis

We’ve done a couple of ranking challenges before, starting first with the Accord, then the Corvette, and following up a few months later with the Mustang. Today we rank a nameplate which has been in production longer than any of those — in fact, it’s the longest-running in America.

It’s the Suburban.

Today is Part I of II in the Chevrolet Suburban ranking challenge, as pitching 11 generations together is a bit much for a single week. The first part of the challenge will cover generations one through six. There’s a marked difference in generations seven to eleven, which we’ll see next week. On with the challenge…

1935-1940

Suburban started out in 1935, bearing the full name of Carryall Suburban. The intent was a functional vehicle which could carry a family of eight and all their required luggage and other junk. Available only in two-door wagon format, Chevrolet did let buyers choose between rear swinging doors or a hatch. Four-wheel drive was not available.

1941-1946

Suburban’s second generation was interrupted by the occurrence of World War II. As such, GM only produced vehicles for model years 1941, 1942, and 1946, as all production in the interim years was devoted to military transport variants. Still two-door only, for the first time Chevrolet and GMC versions used different engines. The more basic Chevrolet had a 3.5-liter inline-six; the GMC had a 3.7-liter.

1947-1954

The third generation Suburban consolidated production for the first time, with all examples between 1947 and 1954 built at GM’s Van Nuys, California plant. The doors numbered two, but things started to take on a more boxy, SUV shape in this era. Seats in the front were now a split bench style, and slid forward to allow access to rear seats. For the first time, an automatic transmission was made available.

1955-1959

Fourth-generation Suburbans got a late start for the 1955 model year, not appearing until March. Instrumentation in this generation was shared with passenger car models as General Motors gathered a family customer base in suburbia. Cylinders added up to eight, while the I6 faded from popularity. And now customers could specify four-wheel drive. It was all coming together.

1960-1966

In 1960, the Suburban moved even closer to the shape modern consumers would consider “SUV.” Newly available this year was an independent front suspension. Revisions in 1962 and again in 1964 made its appearance more streamlined and conservative. This generation offered more choice to consumers than ever before, and available engines included I6, V6, and V8 versions.

1967-1972

In its sixth generation for 1967, the Suburban’s transformation into modern SUV was nearly complete. Not quite at five total doors yet, customers settled for three: One door on the driver’s side, and two on the passenger. 1970 was the final year a panel truck was available for purchase, and 1971 heralded disc brakes on the front wheels and an optional tilt steering wheel. Engines now included the familiar 350 and 396 V8s.

Six generations of Suburban, spanning American history from pre-War through early Malaise. In what order do you rank them, best to worst?

[Images: General Motors]

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 27 comments
  • Corey Lewis Corey Lewis on Sep 06, 2018

    I know the ranking for the second half of Suburban generations will be more fun, but we sort of had to do this part first. Next week!

  • Rocketrodeo Rocketrodeo on Sep 07, 2018

    Objectively, each generation got dynamically better. Handling, brakes, suspension, engine all underwent incremental improvements. I've driven the pickup versions of the most recent four of these, and while none of them drive anything like modern vehicles, you really don't want to spend much time in any of these previous to 1967. Stylingwise, I like the 1960s versions the best. Having had to drive many 50s-60s-70s vehicles, though, since that's what my parents and grandparents had, I don't suffer from old-car nostalgia much. There's something to be said for mechanical simplicity, but much less for deathtrap brakes and extraordinarily vague handling. I owned a Suburban from the next generation, a 1979 454, and that's absolutely as far back as I'd ever want to go again.

  • MaintenanceCosts Nobody here seems to acknowledge that there are multiple use cases for cars.Some people spend all their time driving all over the country and need every mile and minute of time savings. ICE cars are better for them right now.Some people only drive locally and fly when they travel. For them, there's probably a range number that works, and they don't really need more. For the uses for which we use our EV, that would be around 150 miles. The other thing about a low range requirement is it can make 120V charging viable. If you don't drive more than an average of about 40 miles/day, you can probably get enough electrons through a wall outlet. We spent over two years charging our Bolt only through 120V, while our house was getting rebuilt, and never had an issue.Those are extremes. There are all sorts of use cases in between, which probably represent the majority of drivers. For some users, what's needed is more range. But I think for most users, what's needed is better charging. Retrofit apartment garages like Tim's with 240V outlets at every spot. Install more L3 chargers in supermarket parking lots and alongside gas stations. Make chargers that work like Tesla Superchargers as ubiquitous as gas stations, and EV charging will not be an issue for most users.
  • MaintenanceCosts I don't have an opinion on whether any one plant unionizing is the right answer, but the employees sure need to have the right to organize. Unions or the credible threat of unionization are the only thing, history has proven, that can keep employers honest. Without it, we've seen over and over, the employers have complete power over the workers and feel free to exploit the workers however they see fit. (And don't tell me "oh, the workers can just leave" - in an oligopolistic industry, working conditions quickly converge, and there's not another employer right around the corner.)
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh [h3]Wake me up when it is a 1989 635Csi with a M88/3[/h3]
  • BrandX "I can charge using the 240V outlets, sure, but it’s slow."No it's not. That's what all home chargers use - 240V.
  • Jalop1991 does the odometer represent itself in an analog fashion? Will the numbers roll slowly and stop wherever, or do they just blink to the next number like any old boring modern car?
Next