Next Porsche 911 GT3 Could Spin to 9,500 RPM

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

If you want a good example of evolution, you don’t need to venture all the way to the Galapagos Islands. Simply look at the lineage of the Porsche 911 for confirmation of how a species evolves and adapts over time.

Not long ago, the mighty 911 Turbo was the only example of the breed with a snail attached to its rear-mounted engine. Now, with turbos pervading nearly the entire line, it seemed as if naturally aspirated 911s would disappear like the dodo bird. However, we’re now hearing rumours the GT3 may retain its non-turbo status … with a flat-six that screams its way to 9,500 rpm.

Speaking to Aussie mag Which Car, one Thomas Mader, Porsche’s lead man on GT road car engines (and I thought *my * job was cool), explained he does not think the current 4.0-liter six will disappear before suggesting an increase in piston stroke and a bump of 500 rpm on the redline.

Porsche’s engine man also said the company will “look at the things we have on track to put in the street car.” While we’re speculating, let’s also assume this statement alludes to the 4.0-liter racing engine that’s mounted amidships in the 911 RSR. That mill revs to 9,500 rpm and sounds damned good doing it. Naturally, a roadgoing engine is expected to last significantly longer than a race motor, so any adaptation of the RSR’s 4.0-liter would undoubtedly give a few concessions to durability.

Doing such modifications to the engine would also require an examination of the rest of the car. From the What Car story: “For [the new GT3 RS], [9,000 rpm] is matched perfect to the whole system. Now I have to speak to my colleagues and we will have a car, and we will have 9,500 revs, and matched to that all to the gearbox, then we will work on that technical side, which should be possible … but [although] we have that engine for the racetrack, the lifetime aspect for road car is different.”

The current GT3 spins up to a 9,000 rpm redline, making 520 pavement-pummeling horsepower. Porsche has been busy touting its lap time of 6:56.4 set at the Nürburgring-Nordschleife circuit in Germany. Those GT3 owners without carte blanche to the Green Hell can console themselves with 0-60 mph blasts in 3.2 seconds and a 312 km/h top speed (that metric measure sounds better than 195 mph).

As evolution has taught us, the hardiest of creatures adapt and change to their environments in order to survive. The naturally-aspirated 911 has been around since 1963. We doubt it is going away any time soon.

[Images: Porsche]

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 10 comments
  • Dal20402 Dal20402 on May 01, 2018

    A stroker flat six with that redline will result in greater than F1 piston speeds. I hope for the buyer's sake there's good metallurgy.

  • 05lgt 05lgt on May 02, 2018

    312 km/h top speed (that metric measure sounds better than 195 mph) I'd take the extra .6% and want mine to go 195MPH.

  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
  • Lou_BC "That’s expensive for a midsize pickup" All of the "offroad" midsize trucks fall in that 65k USD range. The ZR2 is probably the cheapest ( without Bison option).
  • Lou_BC There are a few in my town. They come out on sunny days. I'd rather spend $29k on a square body Chevy
  • Lou_BC I had a 2010 Ford F150 and 2010 Toyota Sienna. The F150 went through 3 sets of brakes and Sienna 2 sets. Similar mileage and 10 year span.4 sets tires on F150. Truck needed a set of rear shocks and front axle seals. The solenoid in the T-case was replaced under warranty. I replaced a "blend door motor" on heater. Sienna needed a water pump and heater blower both on warranty. One TSB then recall on spare tire cable. Has a limp mode due to an engine sensor failure. At 11 years old I had to replace clutch pack in rear diff F150. My ZR2 diesel at 55,000 km. Needs new tires. Duratrac's worn and chewed up. Needed front end alignment (1st time ever on any truck I've owned).Rear brakes worn out. Left pads were to metal. Chevy rear brakes don't like offroad. Weird "inside out" dents in a few spots rear fenders. Typically GM can't really build an offroad truck issue. They won't warranty. Has fender-well liners. Tore off one rear shock protector. Was cheaper to order from GM warehouse through parts supplier than through Chevy dealer. Lots of squeaks and rattles. Infotainment has crashed a few times. Seat heater modual was on recall. One of those post sale retrofit.Local dealer is horrific. If my son can't service or repair it, I'll drive 120 km to the next town. 1st and last Chevy. Love the drivetrain and suspension. Fit and finish mediocre. Dealer sucks.
  • MaintenanceCosts You expect everything on Amazon and eBay to be fake, but it's a shame to see fake stuff on Summit Racing. Glad they pulled it.
Next