The 'Best All-Around Performance' Car Available is the Mitsubishi Mirage, Apparently

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

If you’ve ever been inside a Mitsubishi Mirage, you know its only slightly preferable to being hogtied and drug behind a much nicer car. Its engine is beyond anemic at highway speeds, there is an uncomfortable level of road noise, and it’s about as luxurious as a shoebox. The Mirage is the rental you receive when the “special value” option seems too good to be true — because it is.

Prepare yourself for a brain aneurysm as you read the following sentence: The Mitsubishi Mirage is, according to the Automotive Science Group, the best performance vehicle money can buy. That, and Mitsubishi is honored as the “Best All-Around Performance Brand.”

How could this possibly happen?

Now might be a good opportunity to remind everyone how important it is to understand the methodologies behind these studies and awards.

In the case of the Automotive Science Group, top awards are divided into subcategories that measure environmental, economic, and social “performance.” While economic performance translates directly to the purchasing price of the vehicle, the other two are atypical ways to qualitatively assess a car and beg for more explanation.

Environmental performance measures the overall planetary impact. That includes everything from how much fuel a given vehicle burns to the raw materials and energy required in its production. There are even metrics to measure the amount of effort, energy, and materials needed to properly dismantle and dispose of the vehicle at the end of its life.

The social methodology is even more extensive. Automotive Science Group’s social performance is measured by assessing the corporate and governmental commitment to the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and the United Nations Global Compact. Essentially, it seeks to ensure the car was not produced anywhere human rights are an issue — but goes so far as to make sure vehicle sales won’t somehow contribute toward terrorism, organized crime, slavery, or child labor.

That’s incredibly specific for a car and company that are being dubbed “best all-around.” And, as much as Mitsubishi should be getting kudos for accidentally producing the most morally righteous and socially responsible vehicles on the market, simply announcing they’ve won an award for “performance” is more than a little misleading. Of course, an advertisement that reads your company hurt the least amount of people and ruins the environment less does lack the broad appeal of a “BEST PERFORMANCE” banner hoisted above your product.

It’s difficult to fault Mitsubishi here, though. While it would’ve been nice if it had presented the award with more clarity and marketed themselves appropriately, they just want the positive publicity. It’s our job to ensure the onslaught of awards are vetted and the methodologies behind them are given clarity, because nobody else is going to bother. We need to take the time to remind ourselves that J.D. Power’ s “Best in Initial Quality” only covers the first 90 days of ownership and Motor Trend’s “Car of the Year” is based on little more than a gut feeling. (They picked the Chevy Malibu in 1997 for Christ’s sake.)

So, if you want to save a yourself bundle of cash, be good to the environment, and enjoy the most guilt-free driving experience of your entire life, then the Mitsubishi Mirage is definitely the vehicle for you. However, I urge you to look elsewhere if you truly want a car with the “Best All-Around Performance.”

[Image: Mitsubishi Motors]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 43 comments
  • Shepd Shepd on Apr 05, 2017

    Reviewers love to hate the Mirage. People renting the Mirage hate it. But owners love the Mirage. Could it be there's a certain segment of the market that just wants the cheapest car they can buy that reliably gets them from a to b, and uses the least gas possible? Nahhhh. EVERYONE buys a car based on styling, features, comfort and handling! Everyone! Nobody buys based on reliability, price and mpg! All the reviewers everywhere told me so!

    • Cobrajet25 Cobrajet25 on Apr 06, 2017

      Don't forget those all-important 0-60 times. You know, because everyone buys that new family CUV with the intention of taking it to the drag strip and hammering it through the quarter mile against a stopwatch. Any car that can't get up to freeway speed in under 8-9 seconds is considered 'incredibly unsafe' by online car guys nowadays, since a V6 Camry can do it in 6.1 seconds. An Accord V6 Touring needs only 5.8. A 1970 Challenger with a 426 Hemi needed 6.3!

  • Pig Hater Pig Hater on Apr 05, 2017

    I know of one owner who's owned a Mirage for 30,000 trouble free miles so far. Gotta love that honest little stripper.

    • Cobrajet25 Cobrajet25 on Apr 06, 2017

      Mine has 61k, and not one single problem. I know of someone who has one of these cars that recently got their first CEL...at 150,000 miles. The Mirage is as simple and reliable as a stone axe, but, of course, that isn't good enough anymore.

  • SCE to AUX All that lift makes for an easy rollover of your $70k truck.
  • SCE to AUX My son cross-shopped the RAV4 and Model Y, then bought the Y. To their surprise, they hated the RAV4.
  • SCE to AUX I'm already driving the cheap EV (19 Ioniq EV).$30k MSRP in late 2018, $23k after subsidy at lease (no tax hassle)$549/year insurance$40 in electricity to drive 1000 miles/month66k miles, no range lossAffordable 16" tiresVirtually no maintenance expensesHyundai (for example) has dramatically cut prices on their EVs, so you can get a 361-mile Ioniq 6 in the high 30s right now.But ask me if I'd go to the Subaru brand if one was affordable, and the answer is no.
  • David Murilee Martin, These Toyota Vans were absolute garbage. As the labor even basic service cost 400% as much as servicing a VW Vanagon or American minivan. A skilled Toyota tech would take about 2.5 hours just to change the air cleaner. Also they also broke often, as they overheated and warped the engine and boiled the automatic transmission...
  • Marcr My wife and I mostly work from home (or use public transit), the kid is grown, and we no longer do road trips of more than 150 miles or so. Our one car mostly gets used for local errands and the occasional airport pickup. The first non-Tesla, non-Mini, non-Fiat, non-Kia/Hyundai, non-GM (I do have my biases) small fun-to-drive hatchback EV with 200+ mile range, instrument display behind the wheel where it belongs and actual knobs for oft-used functions for under $35K will get our money. What we really want is a proper 21st century equivalent of the original Honda Civic. The Volvo EX30 is close and may end up being the compromise choice.
Next