Upcoming Buick Regal GS Says Goodbye to the Stick, Document Shows

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Buick did a bad job hiding the fact that a brawny GS variant of its 2018 Regal Sportback is on the way. It accidentally teased the vehicle’s presence on its Canadian website earlier this month before attempting — and failing — to remove all traces of this nugget from the internet.

Well, thanks to the California Air Resources Board, we now have documented proof of the GS’s return. The go-fast Buick will bow as a 2018 model, perhaps concurrently with its liftback and wagon siblings, but don’t expect any drivetrain similarities to the outgoing model.

The emissions document covers a host of 2018 General Motors passenger cars outfitted with 3.6-liter V6 engines. As the lesser Regals see only a turbocharged 2.0-liter four-cylinder (in two torque outputs), the 3.6-liter “Regal AWD” listed here can only be the GS.

This GS breaks with the current model in several ways. This time around, it looks like GM isn’t in the mood to offer buyers much choice. The only transmission available is a nine-speed automatic, which means the save-the-manuals crowd can add Buick to its list of automakers no longer fielding a stick shift.

Oddly, the nine-speed gearbox is only found on front-wheel drive variants of the 2018 Regal Sportback and TourX. As the document states, four-wheel motivation comes standard on the GS, unlike the choice offered by the previous generation. Buick’s AWD system features torque vectoring for improved performance.

While the document doesn’t dish any details on engine output, the same engine makes between 305 and 335 horsepower in other applications. For the GS, it’s possible GM could raise that power ceiling.

One thing that isn’t too mysterious is what the GS should look like. The China-bound GS was revealed last week ahead of the Shanghai Auto Show, sporting a body kit, chromed air inlets and larger, blacked-out wheels. Unlike stateside customers, Chinese buyers will have to make do with GM’s turbo 2.0-liter as the sole engine offering.

[Image: General Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 15 comments
  • Superdessucke Superdessucke on Apr 17, 2017

    Yawn. A resurrected Somerset package outsells this unoffending "sport" model 5:1. Next.

  • Nickoo Nickoo on Apr 17, 2017

    Who really cares? This car is apparently a loser in quality and dependability and has the highest initial sell/off return rate of all vehicles on the road, if you happen to even see one, they are rarer than hen's teeth, I've seen one regal (not even the GS, in the last 5 years)...And it's no wonder, its the same cost as the German brands that come with more cache, with NONE of that cache associated with it. In addition, it has the "I can't believe that's a Busquawk!" cringe worthy marketing with terrible music. Anyone who WANTS to drive a stick probably wouldn't be choosing a Buick Regal GS to begin with, so many better choices out there with the big 3 from Japan and the big 3 from Germany. That puts this car at 7th place, if not even worse, yes I realize not all of those have a stick option, but still, 7th place...Not to mention, stick drivers, who have to drive a stick are probably looking at something to pair that stick with besides a midsized "performance" sedan, mustang, challenger, miata, 370Z, etc. BTW, I'm not sure if I should be amused or offended when WordPress asks me to "prove my humanity" when I log in, and prove it with solving 2+1...

    • See 1 previous
    • Superdessucke Superdessucke on Apr 18, 2017

      Unless you got one wrong I wouldn't worry too much.

  • David Murilee Martin, These Toyota Vans were absolute garbage. As the labor even basic service cost 400% as much as servicing a VW Vanagon or American minivan. A skilled Toyota tech would take about 2.5 hours just to change the air cleaner. Also they also broke often, as they overheated and warped the engine and boiled the automatic transmission...
  • Marcr My wife and I mostly work from home (or use public transit), the kid is grown, and we no longer do road trips of more than 150 miles or so. Our one car mostly gets used for local errands and the occasional airport pickup. The first non-Tesla, non-Mini, non-Fiat, non-Kia/Hyundai, non-GM (I do have my biases) small fun-to-drive hatchback EV with 200+ mile range, instrument display behind the wheel where it belongs and actual knobs for oft-used functions for under $35K will get our money. What we really want is a proper 21st century equivalent of the original Honda Civic. The Volvo EX30 is close and may end up being the compromise choice.
  • Mebgardner I test drove a 2023 2.5 Rav4 last year. I passed on it because it was a very noisy interior, and handled poorly on uneven pavement (filled potholes), which Tucson has many. Very little acoustic padding mean you talk loudly above 55 mph. The forums were also talking about how the roof leaks from not properly sealed roof rack holes, and door windows leaking into the lower door interior. I did not stick around to find out if all that was true. No talk about engine troubles though, this is new info to me.
  • Dave Holzman '08 Civic (stick) that I bought used 1/31/12 with 35k on the clock. Now at 159k.It runs as nicely as it did when I bought it. I love the feel of the car. The most expensive replacement was the AC compressor, I think, but something to do with the AC that went at 80k and cost $1300 to replace. It's had more stuff replaced than I expected, but not enough to make me want to ditch a car that I truly enjoy driving.
  • ToolGuy Let's review: I am a poor unsuccessful loser. Any car company which introduced an EV which I could afford would earn my contempt. Of course I would buy it, but I wouldn't respect them. 😉
Next