2019 Lexus LX570 - Deep Within the Garden

Chris Tonn
by Chris Tonn
Fast Facts

2019 Lexus LX570

5.7-liter V8 DOHC (383 hp @ 5600 rpm, 403 lb/ft. @ 3600 rpm)
Eight-speed automatic transmission, all-wheel drive
13 city / 18 highway / 15 combined (EPA Rating, MPG)
14.1 (observed mileage, MPG)
Base Price
$86,855 US
As Tested
$88,195 US
Prices include $1,025 destination charge in the United States. (2-row LX not available in Canada)

In the beginning, Willys created the sports-utility vehicle. Now, the sports was negligible and the utility was strictly for the military-industrial complex, and darkness was over two continents at war. And when the war ended, Willys said “let there be civilians who want to drink cheap beer and go rock crawling,” and there were knobby tires and lift kits.

Then the off-roaders began to multiply, each taking their own form. And it was good. But then one saw that the fruit of a tree in the garden looked like a half-used bar of soap — this tree, known as the crossover, represents all that is evil.

Lexus has embraced everything within the realm of the sports-utility spectrum. From tiny crossovers to this massive 2019 Lexus LX570, nearly all needs can be covered. But is this biggest Lexus good or evil?

Yes, it’s functionally a Toyota Land Cruiser with Lexus touches. The Land Cruiser, legendary as an indestructible, go-anywhere people-and-stuff carrier, has long been the flagship of Toyota’s lineup. Within Lexus, however, the LX570 seems an afterthought — and interestingly, the two vehicles aren’t that far apart in price.

This is probably the worst appearance of Lexus’ predator grille. When applied to a truck of this size, it looks like it can eat small children. Beyond that and the blocky tail, it’s a benign looking beast, but I can’t get past that horrifying grille.

The interior works well — mercifully, the LX uses an up-to-date version of the Lexus infotainment system, which, while by no means perfect, is much better than the clunky touchscreen used on the baby brother GX I tested last fall. I’m still not a fan of the mouse-style control for most audio and navigation functions, but it’s miles better than the older system.

Seating front and rear is perfectly comfortable. I’m a bit surprised that this LX570 is available with the option of either two or three rows of seats — the two rows on my tester make for a cavernous luggage compartment, swallowing everything I could toss while asking for more.

With so much mass grounding the LX to the ground, you’d think it’d be an incredible highway cruiser. And while the ride is sublime, the steering requires a great deal of correction to maintain a lane on anything but glass-smooth tarmac. Plus, the mileage is not good. Sure, you’re moving 5800 pounds with a 383-hp V8, so you wouldn’t expect Prius-level efficiency, but my drive time included more highway time than I usually encounter. Rather than approaching the EPA highway estimate, I barely met the city numbers with a 14.1-mpg average.

Honestly, I’d love to see some of the hybrid technology that Toyota/Lexus have perfected trickle up to their larger vehicles. I’d have to believe that a significant impact could be made if the LX, GX, Tundra, and Land Cruiser had some electrons moving their mass.

I’m struggling to picture the market for the LX570. Perhaps this will attract an owner who needs the cachet of a luxury marque at the country club or at the office yet needs to haul a horse trailer or a boat on weekends. But none of these functions focus on the core excellence of the Land Cruiser platform within — off-road superiority. The light, vague steering that helps whilst rock crawling makes interstate drives more of a chore than needed.

Oddly, the LX570 can tow 7000 pounds, while the very similar Land Cruiser is rated at 8100 pounds. 1100 pounds doesn’t sound like much, but it can make a difference if you’re looking at travel trailers, enclosed race trailers, or a longer boat.

For the off-road fanatics, check out the suspension articulation at the, ahem, off-road park — better known as a mostly abandoned shopping mall.

I’m sure there are a few crazies out there who will happily wheel their $88,195 luxury SUV out in the wilderness, and for those, I’m certain that you’ll be satisfied. The only true sin I found is gluttony — it’s so thirsty! But, you say, first cast out the beam of thine own eye, and you’re right. I’m afraid that my brief foray in mall crawling is a more realistic representation of the life of a Lexus LX, and for this, it is less than ideal.

[Images: © 2019 Chris Tonn]

Chris Tonn
Chris Tonn

Some enthusiasts say they were born with gasoline in their veins. Chris Tonn, on the other hand, had rust flakes in his eyes nearly since birth. Living in salty Ohio and being hopelessly addicted to vintage British and Japanese steel will do that to you. His work has appeared in eBay Motors, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars, Reader's Digest, AutoGuide, Family Handyman, and Jalopnik. He is a member of the Midwest Automotive Media Association, and he's currently looking for the safety glasses he just set down somewhere.

More by Chris Tonn

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 84 comments
  • APaGttH APaGttH on Jul 09, 2019

    Give the difference in price between the LC and the 570 - I don't know why anyone would buy the LC. The Lexus dealer experience is worth the difference on its own and when you're paying this much money for a vehicle, another $5K to $10K (or the difference in lease payment) isn't all that much.

  • Carlson Fan Carlson Fan on Jul 09, 2019

    "I barely met the city numbers with a 14.1-mpg average." What a joke, I had 3000 lbs of boat behind my 2007 'Hoe running in "3" last weekend and I got that mileage. The exterior styling is an absolute mess. Cohesive & well proportioned it's not. Who would spend $90K to drive something this ugly & underpowered???? Just get a Yukon Denail w/6.2 and drive a real truck.

  • Lostjr Sedans have been made less practical, with low rooflines and steeply raked A pillars. It makes them harder to get in and out of. Probably harder to put a kid in a child seat. Sedans used to be more family oriented.
  • Bob Funny how Oldsmobile was offering a GPS system to help if you were lost, yet GM as a company was very lost. Not really sure that they are not still lost. They make hideous looking trucks, Cadillac is a crappy Chevy pretending to be fancy. To be honest, I would never step in a GM show room now or ever. Boring, cheap ugly and bad resale why bother. I get enough of GM when i rent on trips from airports. I have to say, does anybody at GM ever drive what everyone else drives? Do they ever then look at what crap they put out in style fit and finish? Come on, for real, do they? Cadillac updated slogan should be " sub standard of the 3rd world", or " almost as good as Tata motors". Enough said.
  • Sam Jacobs I want a sedan. When a buy a car or even rent one, I don’t want to ride up high. I don’t want a 5-door. I want a trunk to keep my stuff out of sight. It’s quieter, cars handle better, I don’t need to be at the same height as a truck. I have a 2022 Subaru Legacy Touring XT, best car ever, equipped as a luxury sedan, so quick and quiet. I don’t understand automakers’ decisions to take away sedans or simply stop updating them — giving up the competition. The Camry and Accord should not be our only choices. Impala and Fusion were beautiful when they were axed.
  • Spamvw I think you need to remember WHY the big 2 and 1/2 got out of the car business. Without going political, the CAFE standards signed into law meant unless you had a higher gas mileage fleet, you couldn't meet the standards.The Irony is that, the law made sedans so small with low roof lines, that normal people migrated to SUV's and Trucks. Now we get worse mileage than before.
  • TheEndlessEnigma Somehow, Toyota, Honda, Hyundai/Kia and Mazda are able to build sedans in North America AND turn a profit on those sedans at the same time.
Next