BMW Would Rather Phase Out Its Manuals Than Borrow a U.S. Gearbox

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

To industry watchers, the manual transmission’s future seems as rosy as that of the Steve Miller Band, circa 1983.

Automakers on both sides of the Atlantic and Pacific have pried the stick shift out of an ever-increasing number of vehicles, and some manufacturers have chosen to drop the technology altogether. With market share reaching never-before-seen lows, the three-pedal lifestyle seems headed towards an unavoidable (and imminent) grave.

Blame technology. Blame laziness. Blame yourself.

Over in Munich, the sentiment seems quite similar. BMW has long occupied the ranks of true driver’s cars, but its leaders make no bones about the brand’s eventual abandonment of the row-your-own transmission, even in relatively stick-happy Europe. Lately, even dual-clutch transmissions appear to be in Bimmer’s bad books. And as for an American solution to its manual transmission problem, well, forget that.

Speaking to Australia’s Drive, Peter Quintus, vice-president of sales and marketing for BMW’s M division, envisions a looming world of automatic transmissions. The advent of new technology has made conventional torque converter autos so efficient and quick, he claims, the industry won’t need anything else. BMW will likely follow.

“The DCT once had two advantages: it was light and its shift speeds were higher,” he said. “Now, a lot of that shift-time advantage has disappeared as automatics get better and smarter.”

Quintus has previously stated that the manual transmission probably will probably disappear from the brand in six or seven years. While the option once used to offer the most cogs, nine-and ten-speed automatics have proliferated, erasing the efficiency edge. There’s undeniable sportiness in a stick, but rising horsepower and torque figures have rendered many high-output drivetrains a no-go zone for manuals.

An output of 450 hp and 450 lb-ft is about the limit of what a manual tranny can handle without impacting long-term durability, Quintus said. That’s bad news for M aficionados. When asked why BMW doesn’t simply source a stick from its brawny Detroit competitors, Quintus was blunt.

“We looked at US gearboxes. We found they were heavy and the shift quality was awful,” he said. “I’m not even sure the next generation of M3 and M4 models from BMW will have the option of a manual gearbox.”

Last month, we told you that fewer than 1 percent of non-M 3 Series BMWs in U.S. inventories are manual-shift cars, with the take rate rising to 2 percent when M-badged models are included. Purists will scream, holler, pound their fists and drink themselves into a foggy oblivion, but the epitaph has already been written by the consumer.

[Image: BMW Group]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 145 comments
  • Jaybee2 Jaybee2 on Apr 27, 2017

    I don't think one can generalize and say it's only the mainstream, non-enthusiast cars that are driving the demise of the MT – look at Porsche GT3, Mercedes AMG-GT, Ferrari, Aston and any of several other high end sports machines – none available with MT (altho' I did just very recently read that Porsche will bring back MT for the GT3 in '18). I think there will continue to be a small but vocal demand for MT esp in sports-oriented cars, but the issue is whether the manufacturers will serve that market demographic. And unless one has the necessary chops to swap or coin out an auto for a MT, it is foreseeable that most people will just throw in the towel. As @SteveMar indicates above, the modern autos are very good and in some instances better than a MT.

  • REVitHigh REVitHigh on Apr 28, 2017

    Nobody in the US wants a manual so manufacturers are forced to comply with what the customers want in the largest car market.

  • Urlik You missed the point. The Feds haven’t changed child labor laws so it is still illegal under Federal law. No state has changed their law so that it goes against a Federal child labor hazardous order like working in a slaughter house either.
  • Plaincraig 1975 Mercury Cougar with the 460 four barrel. My dad bought it new and removed all the pollution control stuff and did a lot of upgrades to the engine (450hp). I got to use it from 1986 to 1991 when I got my Eclipse GSX. The payments and insurance for a 3000GT were going to be too much. No tickets no accidents so far in my many years and miles.My sister learned on a 76 LTD with the 350 two barrel then a Ford Escort but she has tickets (speeding but she has contacts so they get dismissed or fine and no points) and accidents (none her fault)
  • Namesakeone If I were the parent of a teenage daughter, I would want her in an H1 Hummer. It would be big enough to protect her in a crash, too big for her to afford the fuel (and thus keep her home), big enough to intimidate her in a parallel-parking situation (and thus keep her home), and the transmission tunnel would prevent backseat sex.If I were the parent of a teenage son, I would want him to have, for his first wheeled transportation...a ride-on lawnmower. For obvious reasons.
  • ToolGuy If I were a teen under the tutelage of one of the B&B, I think it would make perfect sense to jump straight into one of those "forever cars"... see then I could drive it forever and not have to worry about ever replacing it. This plan seems flawless, doesn't it?
  • Rover Sig A short cab pickup truck, F150 or C/K-1500 or Ram, preferably a 6 cyl. These have no room for more than one or two passengers (USAA stats show biggest factor in teenage accidents is a vehicle full of kids) and no back seat (common sense tells you what back seats are used for). In a full-size pickup truck, the inevitable teenage accident is more survivable. Second choice would be an old full-size car, but these have all but disappeared from the used car lots. The "cute small car" is a death trap.
Next