FCA Isn't Willing to Let Go of Its Rear-drive Cars Just Yet: Report

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Fiat Chrysler Automobiles sure loves its aging rear-wheel-drive LX platform, so much so that it might just keep it around for an extra two years.

According to Automotive News, sources claim the Dodge Charger, Challenger and Chrysler 300 will forgo their planned platform swap in 2018 and soldier on until at least 2020. If true — and FCA’s lack of allegiance to long-term product plans lends it credence — that means no major redesign for the models until 2021.

It’s good news for lovers of the current generation models, but it’s yet another sign that the Chrysler 300 may be doomed.

FCA’s constantly evolving product pipeline calls for the Challenger and Charger to adopt the Alfa Romeo Giulia’s Giorgio platform for the 2019 model year. The swap would likely see the models drop significant weight. Still, this isn’t the first rumor about a potential life extension for the LX-platform trio, and it’s backed up by hazy details contained in FCA Canada’s new labor contract.

The automaker has a habit of keeping old, profitable models around beyond their lifespan. Exhibit A? The Dodge Grand Caravan, which should have bowed out shortly after the appearance of the Chrysler Pacifica. Give ’em a cheaper option that we can also throw to fleets, figured FCA — a strategy the automaker has in store for the current-generation Ram 1500.

If what the sources claim is true, expect an LX-platform vehicle styling refresh in 2018.

Officially, FCA boss Sergio Marchionne has praised the Giorgio platform up and down. In a conference call last month, Marchionne said, “I think it’s proved out to be all and more than we expected, and I think its utilization across a wide range of applications within the group is probably the most beneficial thing we’ve done from a technical development here in a long time.”

The platform, stretched and likely widened before arrival, could underpin a rumored Dodge Barracuda convertible.

Lost in all this is the fate of the sole Chrysler passenger car in FCA’s stable (the 200 doesn’t count — it’s dead come December). The only mention of the 300 in product timelines concerns a possible redesign around 2020. Two sources — one inside FCA and another at a supplier — told Automotive News that one of FCA’s large cars likely won’t survive the platform swap.

All signs point to the 300. Earlier this year, Marchionne mulled publicly that a future 300 could borrow the front-wheel-drive Pacifica platform.

Then, in last month’s conference call, the CEO dropped another hint.

Speaking of the Giorgio platform, Marchionne claimed the platform would “preserve the uniqueness of the rear-wheel-drive offering that we have across fundamentally four brands which are Alfa, Maserati, Dodge and potentially Jeep.”

His failure to mention Chrysler was glaring. Maybe there’s still a future for the 300 in Chrysler’s lineup — continuing the storied brand without a passenger car seems unthinkable — but it’s sure looking like rear-wheel drive is out of the question.

[Image: © 2016 Bark M./The Truth About Cars]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 43 comments
  • Flipper35 Flipper35 on Nov 08, 2016

    I like the 300C concept from years ago. If they styled the sides like the concept with the current Pacifica grill design I think it would freshen it up nicely.

  • Tomsriv Tomsriv on Dec 08, 2016

    They should have made a 300 wagon as a Magnum replacement. The Magnum was ahead of its time by about 8 years. Now wagons are popular on smaller cars, but the Magnum is a huge seller on the used car market. The 300 styling would work better with the current body style. It would look like one solid block of metal rolling down the road.

  • Namesakeone If I were the parent of a teenage daughter, I would want her in an H1 Hummer. It would be big enough to protect her in a crash, too big for her to afford the fuel (and thus keep her home), big enough to intimidate her in a parallel-parking situation (and thus keep her home), and the transmission tunnel would prevent backseat sex.If I were the parent of a teenage son, I would want him to have, for his first wheeled transportation...a ride-on lawnmower. For obvious reasons.
  • ToolGuy If I were a teen under the tutelage of one of the B&B, I think it would make perfect sense to jump straight into one of those "forever cars"... see then I could drive it forever and not have to worry about ever replacing it. This plan seems flawless, doesn't it?
  • Rover Sig A short cab pickup truck, F150 or C/K-1500 or Ram, preferably a 6 cyl. These have no room for more than one or two passengers (USAA stats show biggest factor in teenage accidents is a vehicle full of kids) and no back seat (common sense tells you what back seats are used for). In a full-size pickup truck, the inevitable teenage accident is more survivable. Second choice would be an old full-size car, but these have all but disappeared from the used car lots. The "cute small car" is a death trap.
  • W Conrad Sure every technology has some environmental impact, but those stuck in fossil fuel land are just not seeing the future of EV's makes sense. Rather than making EV's even better, these automakers are sticking with what they know. It will mean their end.
  • Add Lightness A simple to fix, strong, 3 pedal car that has been tenderized on every corner.
Next