2023 Toyota BZ4X Review – Falling Short

by Tim Healey

Published: August 8th, 2023

Fast Facts

2023 Toyota bZ4X XLE FWD Fast Facts

Powertrain

Single electric motor (201horsepower, 196 lb-ft of torque)

Transmission/Drive Layout

Automatic, front-wheel drive

Fuel Economy, MPGe

131 city / 107 highway / 119 combined (EPA Rating)

Fuel Economy, Le/100km

1.8 city / 2.2 highway / 2.0 combined (NRCan Rating)

Estimated Range

252 miles/406 kilometers

Base Price

$42,000 (U.S.)

As-Tested Price

$44,409 (U.S.)

Prices include $1,215 destination charge in the United States. Availability in Canada is limited.

When it comes to reviews, the 2023 Toyota bZ4X has taken it on its oddly-shaped chin. And, as I found out, for good reason.

That’s a shame because had this car been done right, it could’ve easily worked as affordable EV transport.

Instead, it’s a weird package that has pricing that is considered affordable relative to the average transaction price, but still not "cheap.” And while it’s not a total penalty box to drive, it’s not redeeming enough from behind the wheel to justify the cost.

Compare the bZ to the brand’s own re-done Prius – the new Prius has flaws but it’s generally packaged much better. Yes, the bZ is an EV and the Prius is not, but overall, the latter is a more intriguing proposition than the former.

I’ll admit that when I first slid behind the wheel of the bZ, I was apprehensive about its driving dynamics, based on the reviews I read. I was actually pleasantly surprised – while this car is not really, in any way, fun to drive, it’s fine for around-town commuting. I didn’t hate life while just heading to the grocery store. If I was forced to drive this car for three-to-five years, I’d perhaps be a bit bored, but I’d take heart knowing that one can do way worse.

Again, that’s in terms of basic competency. You won’t want to push this thing in terms of cornering. You get instant EV torque – yay – but other EVs feel swifter when it comes to passing. Still, some of the hate for this car’s driving dynamics seemed overblown.

The bZ4X is available in two trim flavors, XLE and Limited, and with either front-wheel or all-wheel drive. My test unit was an XLE with front-wheel drive, meaning the electric motor on board was good for 201 horsepower and 196 lb-ft of torque. The juice comes from a lithium-ion battery pack with a 71.4-kWh capacity. Toyota promises a range of up to 252 miles for this configuration.

Charging is listed at about 9 hours from “low to full” on a Level 2 charger.

I suspect most of the brickbats tossed the bZ’s way have to do with its ugly-duckling styling – and with Toyota choosing to market what is essentially a tall wagon as an SUV.

It’s a weird-looking vehicle, though beauty, in this case, is the eye of the beholder based on where the beholder is standing in relation to the vehicle. The front-three-quarter and straight-on views aren’t terrible. It’s the truncated roof life and way too busy rear area that complicate things visually, and not in a good way.

The interior layout is less objectionable than the exterior duds, though Toyota has gone a bit too space-age with the instrument cluster. The infotainment screen, which occupies 12.3 inches of space in the center stack, is nicely integrated and uses Toyota’s newer – and much, much improved – infotainment system. The bad news is that Toyota has moved some functions to said system, instead of providing buttons. The good news is that some basic audio and climate controls remain of the physical variety.

The base price for the front-wheel-drive XLE I tested started at $42,000 and came with standard features like a Level 1 charging cord, 18-inch wheels, LED headlights, wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, satellite radio, wireless device charging, and a panoramic sunroof. Options were limited to heated front seats and a heated steering wheel, carpeted floor mats, and the Supersonic Red paint.

Toyota’s SafetySense 3.0 advanced driver-aid system is standard and includes a pre-collision system with pedestrian detection, full-speed dynamic radar cruise control, lane-departure alert with steering assist, lane-tracing assist, automatic high beams, and road-sign assist. Other standard safety ninnies included a rearview camera and blind-spot monitoring with rear cross-traffic alert.

Total price? $44,409.

The bZ4X isn’t exactly a terrible vehicle. I’d heard whispers among my fellow keyboard warriors about how bad it is, and I found those reports to be a bit exaggerated. That said, key competitors offer a better overall experience. Upper bZ4X trims also struggle with range – a top-trim bZ4X has only 222 miles of range. The 252 miles available with the XLE FWD are acceptable, at least.

Yet “not being terrible” isn’t good enough, not as other EVs enter the scene that are more attractive, offer better interior packaging, and are more fun to drive. Oh, and also offer a better range with all-wheel drive.

The bZ4X is far from the dregs of the market. It has a few good things going for it. But it still falls short of what Toyota needs it to be.

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments

Join the conversation

3 of 46 comments

Dukeisduke on Aug 09, 2023

This is Toyota phoning it in. This was designed before they got religion regarding BEVs, so hopefully they'll get with the program on future efforts.

I couldn't figure out what the heck "bZ4x" meant, until I found the Wikipedia article. So bZ stands for "beyond Zero" (emissions), 4 is for the platform size class (4 is RAV4-sized), and "x" is for crossover.

2 Reply
- Sckid213 on Aug 09, 2023
  
  bZ4x sounds like an internal build code. They had a chance to introduce an iconic new word to North America that could develop into something with millions in brand value...like "Prius"...and they go with alphanumeric soup.
  
  2
Add Lightness on Aug 10, 2023

I hope the reduced range for the AWD highlights the foolishness of AWD vs FWD. I already have too many halfshafts in my life to get 2 extra that in reality, will never be needed.
When will this fad of having twice as much drivetrain, that 95% of drivers will never use, end?
If you really need AWD to go skiing, there is no need, as the roads will be closed by then.
I will stick with 4 wheel brakes, good winters and perhaps never used chains if I'm really worried..

1 Reply

Recent Comments

FreedMike Not surprisingly, I have some ideas. What Cadillac needs, I think, is a statement. They don’t really have an identity. They’re trying a statement car with the Celestiq, and while that’s the right idea, it has the wrong styling and a really wrong price tag. So, here’s a first step: instead of a sedan, do a huge, fast, capable and ridiculously smooth and quiet electric touring coupe. If you want an example of what I’m thinking of, check out the magnificent Rolls-Royce Spectre. But this Cadillac coupe would be uniquely American, it’d be named “Eldorado,” and it’d be a lot cheaper than the $450,000 Spectre – call it a buck twenty-five, with a range of bespoke options for prospective buyers that would make each one somewhat unique. Make it 220 inches long, on the same platform as the Celestiq, give it retro ‘60s styling (or you could do a ‘50s or ‘70s throwback, I suppose), and at least 700 horsepower, standard. Why electric? It’s the ultimate throwback to ‘60s powertrains: effortlessly fast, smooth, and quiet, but with a ton more horsepower. It’s the perfect drivetrain for a dignified touring coupe. In fact, I’d skip any mention of environmental responsibility in this car’s marketing – sell it on how it drives, period.  How many would they sell? Not many. But the point of the exercise is to do something that will turn heads and show people what this brand can do.  Second step: give the lineup a mix of electric and gas models, and make Cadillac gas engines bespoke to the brand. If they need to use generic GM engine designs, fine – take those engines and massage them thoroughly into something special to Cadillac, with specific tuning and output. No Cadillac should leave the factory with an engine straight out of a Malibu or a four-banger Silverado. Third step: a complete line-wide interior redo. Stop the cheapness that’s all over the current sedans and crossovers. Just stop it. Use the Lyriq as a blueprint – it’s a big improvement over the current crop and a good first step. I’d also say Cadillac has a good blend of screen-controlled and switch-controlled user interfaces; don’t give into the haptic-touch and wall-to-wall screen thing. (On the subject of Caddy interiors – as much as I bag on the Celestiq, check out the interior on that thing. Wow.)Fourth step: Blackwing All The Things – some gas, others electric. And keep the electric/gas mix so buyers have a choice.Fifth step: be patient. That’s not easy, but if they’re doing a brand reset, it’ll take time. 
NJRide So if GM was serious about selling this why no updates for so long? Or make something truly unique instead of something that looked like a downmarket Altima?
Kmars2009 I rented one last fall while visiting Ohio. Not a bad car...but not a great car either. I think it needs a new version. But CUVs are King... unfortunately!
Ajla Remember when Cadillac introduced an entirely new V8 and proceeded to install it in only 800 cars before cancelling everything?
Bouzouki Cadillac (aka GM!!) made so many mistakes over the past 40 years, right up to today, one could make a MBA course of it. Others have alluded to them, there is not enough room for me to recite them in a flowing, cohesive manner.Cadillac today is literally a tarted-up Chevrolet. They are nice cars, and the "aura" of the Cadillac name still works on several (mostly female) consumers who are not car enthusiasts.The CT4 and CT5 offer superlative ride and handling, and even performance--but, it is wrapped in sheet metal that (at least I think) looks awful, with (still) sub-par interiors. They are niche cars. They are the last gasp of the Alpha platform--which I have been told by people close to it, was meant to be a Pontiac "BMW 3-series". The bankruptcy killed Pontiac, but the Alpha had been mostly engineered, so it was "Cadillac-ized" with the new "edgy" CTS styling.Most Cadillacs sold are crossovers. The most profitable "Cadillac" is the Escalade (note that GM never jack up the name on THAT!).The question posed here is rather irrelevant. NO ONE has "a blank check", because GM (any company or corporation) does not have bottomless resources.Better styling, and superlative "performance" (by that, I mean being among the best in noise, harshness, handling, performance, reliablity, quality) would cost a lot of money.Post-bankruptcy GM actually tried. No one here mentioned GM's effort to do just that: the "Omega" platform, aka CT6.The (horribly misnamed) CT6 was actually a credible Mercedes/Lexus competitor. I'm sure it cost GM a fortune to develop (the platform was unique, not shared with any other car. The top-of-the-line ORIGINAL Blackwing V8 was also unique, expensive, and ultimately...very few were sold. All of this is a LOT of money).I used to know the sales numbers, and my sense was the CT6 sold about HALF the units GM projected. More importantly, it sold about half to two thirds the volume of the S-Class (which cost a lot more in 201x)Many of your fixed cost are predicated on volume. One way to improve your business case (if the right people want to get the Green Light) is to inflate your projected volumes. This lowers the unit cost for seats, mufflers, control arms, etc, and makes the vehicle more profitable--on paper.Suppliers tool up to make the number of parts the carmaker projects. However, if the volume is less than expected, the automaker has to make up the difference.So, unfortunately, not only was the CT6 an expensive car to build, but Cadillac's weak "brand equity" limited how much GM could charge (and these were still pricey cars in 2016-18, a "base" car was ).Other than the name, the "Omega" could have marked the starting point for Cadillac to once again be the standard of the world. Other than the awful name (Fleetwood, Elegante, Paramount, even ParAMOUR would be better), and offering the basest car with a FOUR cylinder turbo on the base car (incredibly moronic!), it was very good car and a CREDIBLE Mercedes S-Class/Lexus LS400 alternative. While I cannot know if the novel aluminum body was worth the cost (very expensive and complex to build), the bragging rights were legit--a LARGE car that was lighter, but had good body rigidity. No surprise, the interior was not the best, but the gap with the big boys was as close as GM has done in the luxury sphere.Mary Barra decided that profits today and tomorrow were more important than gambling on profits in 2025 and later. Having sunk a TON of money, and even done a mid-cycle enhancement, complete with the new Blackwing engine (which copied BMW with the twin turbos nestled in the "V"!), in fall 2018 GM announced it was discontinuing the car, and closing the assembly plant it was built in. (And so you know, building different platforms on the same line is very challenging and considerably less efficient in terms of capital and labor costs than the same platform, or better yet, the same model).So now, GM is anticipating that, as the car market "goes electric" (if you can call it that--more like the Federal Government and EU and even China PUSHING electric cars), they can make electric Cadillacs that are "prestige". The Cadillac Celestique is the opening salvo--$340,000. We will see how it works out.