Rumor Mill: Ford May Return to F1

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

With F1’s growing popularity on this side of the pond – thanks to the streaming specials and no fewer than three races in America next year – combined with a potential opening at one of the sport’s best teams, rumblings are emerging that Dearborn could once again immerse itself in the crucible of world motorsport.


Dramatic enough for ya? Hey, we’ve been dying to use the word ‘crucible’ for ages now. Anyway, a report out of motorsport.com is adding fuel to the rumor that Ford is considering a tie-up with Avec Red Bull at some point in the future. According to those gearheads with their collective ears to the ground, Blue Oval suits are thinking about shacking up with the championship team once the latter’s agreement with Honda expires after 2025.


In an incredibly complex (would it be any other way in F1?) series of forthcoming events, Red Bull is committing to producing its own power unit starting in the 2026 calendar year. In order to do this, they’ll need an automotive partner, making one wonder just how this is the team’s ‘own power unit’ after all. Semantics aside, one can wager Red Bull expects to have a great deal more input into the design and such of what drives their car than they currently do in their existing deal with Honda. 


Certainly, any tie-up with an OEM could be for marketing purposes or to leverage their technical expertise. It’s all but a foregone conclusion at this point that power units will incorporate a wealth of electric power technologies.


It seems the team was deep in discussions with Porsche to achieve those goals but hauled out of talks when it became apparent the sportscar maker wanted a lot more control over the project than Red Bull was willing to relinquish. Those in the know suggest Ford wants little to do with formal ownership in the deal, perhaps content to ride the wave of success and lend a hand in development where appropriate.


This brings us back to F1’s recent surge in America. Sure, the Blue Oval is a global brand with plenty of presence in other markets but if F1’s trajectory in this country stays on its current course, you can bet Ford will want to be at the fore on its home turf.


Image: [Ford]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 5 comments
  • ToolGuy ToolGuy on Dec 15, 2022

    I read in these pages that a stock F-150 is a great track vehicle, so this makes perfect sense. 😉

    (After Ford crushes all competitors in F1, they can market a special edition F-Series and call it the F1-50.)

  • Probert Probert on Dec 16, 2022

    Ford sells one car in America. Did F1 open a truck racing series?

    • Dukeisduke Dukeisduke on Dec 16, 2022

      Yeah, it doesn't make as much sense nowadays. But if you go back to the late 1960s and '70s when the Ford Cosworth DFV V8 was dominating F1, it was more about driving sales in Europe, not the US. Here in the US, it was NASCAR and USAC (stock car and open wheel racing) that drove sales. I just finished reading both volumes of Leo Levine's "Ford: The Dust and the Glory", the history of Ford and racing.


      I would think this is still more about driving sales in the rest of the world.


  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
  • GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
  • Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
  • Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.
  • Wjtinfwb Not proud of what Stellantis is rolling out?
Next