Report: Current Ford Mustang to Exit Production At the End of 2028 UPDATED

Chris Teague
by Chris Teague

Automakers work hard to stop leaks and make sure their products are kept under wraps until the time is right. They’re not always successful, however, and sometimes the leaks come from outside the company. This time, it’s the UAW’s documents giving out more info than Ford probably wants, as it recently confirmed that Mustang production will end in 2028.


Rumors have floated that production of the current S650 Mustang would end at that time, but the UAW’s labor agreement with Ford all but confirms it. As Muscle Cars & Trucks pointed out, that could mark the end of the V8 engine in the muscle car segment, though Ford has previously said it’d hang on to the setup for as long as possible.


The Mustang is the last holdout in a segment that once saw several popular models. Chevy is discontinuing the Camaro very soon, and Dodge cut the Charger and Challenger after 2023, though at least one could return with the automaker’s new inline-six engine.


As for the Mustang’s future, the car is expected to run on a new EV-first platform shared with the Mustang Mach-E and a new Mach-E coupe variant. It’s unlikely that a gas engine would continue in the car unless the architecture can support both powertrain configurations. 


UPDATE: Ford has reached out to claim the report we sourced from Muscle Cars and Trucks is factually incorrect. Here's the automaker's statement: “The Muscle Cars & Trucks report about Mustang is not accurate. Beyond this, we don’t comment on speculation about future products.” I did try to get clarification on how the report was incorrect, but Ford's spokesperson reminded me of the latter part of that statement. So the company says the sourced report is incorrect, but is unable and/or unwilling to give us more -- it's standard operating procedure across the industry, as long-time readers well know, not to comment on future product.


It's hard to say what this means, though I think it's probably fair to assume the current Mustang will be produced longer than MC&T reported. We'll keep an eye on this story -- TH


[Image: Ford]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Chris Teague
Chris Teague

Chris grew up in, under, and around cars, but took the long way around to becoming an automotive writer. After a career in technology consulting and a trip through business school, Chris began writing about the automotive industry as a way to reconnect with his passion and get behind the wheel of a new car every week. He focuses on taking complex industry stories and making them digestible by any reader. Just don’t expect him to stay away from high-mileage Porsches.

More by Chris Teague

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 57 comments
  • Kcflyer Kcflyer on Dec 07, 2023

    I have always loved mustangs. But no way I'm paying C8 money for one. So kill it, I won't care.

    • Marques Marques on Jan 03, 2024

      This. Did it occur to anyone that part of the reason that some sports cars aren't as popular as they used to be is because that prices are so high that potential customers have been effectively priced out of the market?? I like a Mustang as much as the next person but paying $40-$75K for one is asinine! Mustangs used to be affordable but now they literally cost more than some mortgages!





  • Spectator Spectator on Jan 09, 2024

    I got an email offer today for a 2024 GT at about 5% off MSRP. Really a lot of bang for the buck!

  • SCE to AUX This was the same car I had (05 xB, stick, "camouflage" color) for 7 years - great car.We called ours "The Lunchbox". I added aftermarket wheels, and the 3rd-party cruise control the dealers could install.It suffered only two failures: bad window switch in week 2 (dealer fixed in 1 hour), bad trailing O2 sensor (fixed myself for $70). Fuel economy was always 28-34 mpg.It was a potential death trap, and ride quality became unbearable after 2 hours. I once did a 10-hour round trip in it and could barely walk after.Traded it for a 2012 Leaf, which was a better car in some ways.
  • Bd2 The "e" nomenclature signifies the e-ATPs which BMW is pursuing.
  • Dave M. I'm sorry to see any storied name go away. The lifespan of the Malibu has fit perfectly in my lifetime years-wise. Some of the highlights include the first and second generations, the '78 revamp (very clean design), and the 2005 generation. Ford, GM and Mopar gave this segment away by allowing Toyota and Honda a foot in the door and then always having to play catch-up. How hard is it to make a truly competitive sedan at a profit? Obviously, Japan Inc. figured it out.I've driven a few rentals these past years; the Malibu got the job done but honestly the Passat and Altima were my rental preferences.
  • Kcflyer actually yes. It's a shame that a product this uncompetitive can still outsell GM's entire EV offerings. Those products have had billions thrown at them. Imagine how nice the new Malibu, Impala, SS, and Lacrosse would be with that kind of commitment.
  • 3SpeedAutomatic Nope....
Next