New Vehicles Have Become Less Affordable: Study

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

According to the Sherlocks at Cox Automotive, Americans saw new-vehicle affordability decline in December and reached a new low for the 2022 calendar year.


And, in other news, the sky is blue and water is wet. 


In all seriousness, an analytic report released this week shows just how far out of reach a new car is getting for some buyers in this country. While median income apparently grew just 0.4 percent, the average price paid for a new vehicle increased by 1.9 percent, rocketing up to $49,507.


This is where the ‘affordability calculator’ comes into play. Cox and Co say they use data from multiple government and industry sources as a unique indicator to calculate the number of weeks of median household income needed to purchase an average new vehicle. This time around, that figure reached a high of 44 weeks, up from 43.3 in November. It crossed the 40-week threshold about a year ago and hasn’t looked back. In late 2019, for example, it was roughly 32 weeks.


The study also put a number on loan rates, which Cox says reached a new 20-year high during the last twelve months. Interest rate hikes, combined with the higher car prices have brought the estimated typical monthly payment up by 2.1 percent to $777, says Cox. Those are decidedly not lucky sevens. It’s one thing for the average price of a new rig to climb into the stratosphere but it’s quite another for those numbers to be compounded by loan terms which compound the problem and make the paper even more unaffordable.


This builds on our report from the other day in which we learned a record number of customers have signed themselves up for four-figure monthly payments. According to Edmunds, 15.7 percent of new vehicle customers in the fourth quarter of 2022 signed up for the privilege of sending a lender $1,000 or more per month for their new car. This, despite the average down payment climbing to a record $6,780 in Q4 of last year.


[Image: Vitpho/Shutterstock]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
9 of 49 comments
  • CKNSLS Sierra SLT CKNSLS Sierra SLT on Jan 20, 2023

    I don't care how a Nissan Versa is equipped it's no comparison to my F150-I can well afford.

    • See 3 previous
    • Lou_BC Lou_BC on Jan 20, 2023

      "An unladen F-150 rides like a buckboard."

      Since when?

      My SuperCrew rode very nice empty. 500 lb in the box did make it stellar.

  • DenverMike DenverMike on Jan 20, 2023

    “If you can afford an F-150 and like it…”


    Sure but if you’re still driving it 20 years later and beyond, not bored with it and even enjoy it, with or without custom upgrades and mods, isn’t it a great “investment”?


    Old pickups are always in fashion, yeah depending on the truck. Also they’re built to commercial standards no matter how equipped. New, used and resto/custom parts are everywhere and cheap, plus everyone can work on them.


    15 MPG average sounds good to me.

    • See 2 previous
    • Jeff S Jeff S on Jan 21, 2023

      I don't disagree. If you buy a vehicle that you really don't like you are less likely to keep it but at the same time don't buy more vehicle than you can afford. I bought the XLT Maverick because I didn't like the black interior with no cruise control and no intermitten wipers in the XL. I didn't want the Lariat because it had vinyl seats or now what they call vegan leather. I like the navy and gray cloth interior and the blue trim that the XLT has better than the interior of the XL or Lariat. I bought the trim level in the middle which checked most of the boxes of what I wanted and that I could live with happily for years and yes spread out over 10 or 20 years the price is insignificant and its exactly what I wanted. I added the factory spray in bed, floor trays, and the full size spare and I bought and installed front and back mudflaps and side window deflectors from the Ford accessory website. I got everything I wanted and if I want to add additional things in the future I can always order those from the Ford accessory website and install them myself. I have been averaging 40 to 50 mpgs in my hybrid Maverick which was another reason for me choosing a hybrid over a turbo 4 which I didn't need AWD since my wife's CRV has it and I seldom used the 4 wheel drive in my 2008 Isuzu crew cab. I didn't need or want a large or midsize truck but I still wanted an open bed albeit a little smaller than I would have preferred but the bed is very flexible and can haul more than you would think it could. I am very happy with the Maverick and it is perfect for me.



  • Mike-NB2 This is a mostly uninformed vote, but I'll go with the Mazda 3 too.I haven't driven a new Civic, so I can't say anything about it, but two weeks ago I had a 2023 Corolla as a rental. While I can understand why so many people buy these, I was surprised at how bad the CVT is. Many rentals I've driven have a CVT and while I know it has one and can tell, they aren't usually too bad. I'd never own a car with a CVT, but I can live with one as a rental. But the Corolla's CVT was terrible. It was like it screamed "CVT!" the whole time. On the highway with cruise control on, I could feel it adjusting to track the set speed. Passing on the highway (two-lane) was risky. The engine isn't under-powered, but the CVT makes it seem that way.A minor complaint is about the steering. It's waaaay over-assisted. At low speeds, it's like a 70s LTD with one-finger effort. Maybe that's deliberate though, given the Corolla's demographic.
  • Mike-NB2 2019 Ranger - 30,000 miles / 50,000 km. Nothing but oil changes. Original tires are being replaced a week from Wednesday. (Not all that mileage is on the original A/S tires. I put dedicated winter rims/tires on it every winter.)2024 - Golf R - 1700 miles / 2800 km. Not really broken in yet. Nothing but gas in the tank.
  • SaulTigh I've got a 2014 F150 with 87K on the clock and have spent exactly $4,180.77 in maintenance and repairs in that time. That's pretty hard to beat.Hard to say on my 2019 Mercedes, because I prepaid for three years of service (B,A,B) and am getting the last of those at the end of the month. Did just drop $1,700 on new Michelins for it at Tire Rack. Tires for the F150 late last year were under $700, so I'd say the Benz is roughly 2 to 3 times as pricy for anything over the Ford.I have the F150 serviced at a large independent shop, the Benz at the dealership.
  • Bike Rather have a union negotiating my pay rises with inflation at the moment.
  • Bike Poor Redapple won't be sitting down for a while after opening that can of Whiparse
Next