Lobbyists Give Static to Government About AM Radio

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

Readers may recall a recent news post in which we mentioned Jim Farley took to Twitter and announced that Ford was heeding requests from policy leaders and rural Americans, electing not to yank AM radio from Ford and Lincoln vehicles. Going a step further, he also said any Ford EVs not currently able to pick up Amplitude Modulation stations would be getting a software update to give them the capability.


Despite this common sense development, a cadre of automaker lobbyists made their way to Washington yesterday to bleat at Congress and stomp their feet. Their message was the opposite of Farley’s, saying lawmakers shouldn’t consider requiring OEMs to include AM radio in their vehicles.


According to The Detroit News, the lobbying arm of the American car industry tried to make a case that plenty of readily available technology exists to take the place of AM radio. Their argument is that warning systems transmit safety messages to members of the general public through a variety of broadcast means, of which many – like FM and satellite – are part and parcel of infotainment systems in modern automobiles, and mandates to retain AM could stifle future innovation.


Congress is skeptical of that reasoning and this author, for once, agrees. Leaving AM radio capability tucked in the corner of an infotainment system hurts no one and surely takes up very little digital real estate. With people like Farley suggesting it is possible to switch on the ability to receive AM radio by way of a simple over-the-air update, leaving the old-school tech in future cars seems like a no-brainer.


These alerts are far and away from the Cold War era in which our nation’s cars were required to have CONELRAD nuclear attack frequencies noted on the face of their in-dash radios with little triangle/circle symbols. Back then, 640 and 1240 on the AM dial were intended to be the go-to frequencies in the event Ruskie bombers started to rain death and destruction upon our heads. That requirement lasted from 1953 – 1964, with various permutations of the Emergency Broadcast System taking its place. 


These days, the Emergency Alert System is designed as a national tool to permit officials the opportunity to broadcast information to the public via a host of mediums, including AM radio. While the EAS can also use FM, satellite, and other means with which to alert the public of impending doom, more than a few Americans live in spots of the country where signals are weak and reception is poor. AM radio, while affected by interference, can often be picked up at a much further distance than other broadcast methods. It is for this reason that lawmakers are considering legislating car companies to include AM radio in their vehicles.


[Image: Proxima Studio/Shutterstock]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 46 comments
  • Fred Fred on Jun 08, 2023

    Remember when radios were an option? Do you know you can use your phone to listen to any radio station in the world? This is just a whole waste of time.

    • See 1 previous
    • Dukeisduke Dukeisduke on Jun 08, 2023

      @Jeff S


      Yep, "R&H" (for radio and heater) used to be a common notation in new and used car ads.


  • Art Vandelay Art Vandelay on Jun 08, 2023

    If it is all about emergency broadcasts put a d@mn shortwave in the car. You can send those all over the planet. Then I can listen to "The Lincolnshire Poacher" or "The Buzzer" on my commute home

  • Redapple2 Cadillac, Acura and Infiniti have very tough rows to hoe.
  • Redapple2 First question: How do you define Sales Success?1 they ve lost more than 35% of all dealers in the last 5 years.2 transition to BEV will cost Billions. No money for new designs3 cars for #2 above have already been designed in BEV form and wont be redone significantly for - what- 10 years? 3b-Lyric and whatever its called are medusa level ugly. How could this design theme be fuglier than arts and science? Evil gm did though4 the market is poisoned. 1/3 of folks with $ would never consider one/ridicule the product. Under 40 yr olds dont even know the brand exists.It is dead and doesn't know it. Like a Vampire.
  • Redapple2 Focus and Fiesta are better than Golf? (overall?) I liked the rentals I had. I would pick these over a Malibu even though it was a step down in class and the rental co would not reduce price.
  • Teddyc73 Oh good lord here we go again criticizing Cadillac for alphanumeric names. It's the same old tired ridiculous argument, and it makes absolutely no sense. Explain to me why alphanumeric names are fine for every other luxury brand....except Cadillac. What young well-off buyer is walking around thinking "Wow, Cadillac is a luxury brand but I thought they had interesting names?" No one. Cadillac's designations don't make sense? And other brands do? Come on.
  • Flashindapan Emergency mid year refresh of all Cadillac models by graphing on plastic fenders and making them larger than anything from Stellantis or Ford.
Next