Ford E-Transit Going Postal

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

The United States Postal Service (USPS) has announced an order for over 9,000 all-electric vans from the Ford Motor Company – presumably to help settle some of the drama surrounding the selected replacement for the venerable Grumman LLV.


Environmental regulators and the Biden administration had sought to encourage the Postal Service to embrace electric vehicles – which was part of the White House’s plan to transition government fleets away from internal-combustion engines. However, the USPS ultimately settled on Oshkosh Defense’s Next Generation Delivery Vehicle (NGDV).


While similar to the ancient Grumman LLV in terms of overall design and the fact that they’re both products fielded by defense contractors, the Oshkosh NGDV comes in four unique flavors split between battery electric, internal combustion, and whether or not the unit possesses all-wheel drive. But the USPS noted in 2021 (shortly after the contract was granted) that only about 10 percent of the fleet would end up being EVs. The stated reason, according to statements made by Postmaster General Louis DeJoy before the United States House of Representatives, was that the USPS would need several billion additional dollars to build the supportive infrastructure required to field a lot of EVs. There were likewise concerns that battery-powered vehicles would be a poor choice for extended routes and colder climates.


Electrified variants of the NGDV were also assumed to cost more upfront than gasoline-driven examples and it wasn’t even clear how long the lead-up time would be for Oshkosh to actually build them. So it prioritized the models that more closely resembled the venerable LLV. But you’ve probably noticed that your local post office doesn’t have many of those left. Despite living up to its namesake, the Grumman Long Life Vehicle ended up in use far longer than the government originally intended and had to be assisted by the occasional Mercedes Metris, Ford Transit, Ram ProMaster, or whatever else the USPS could get its hands on.


The Postal Service’s decision to buy 9,250 Ford E-Transits lays the groundwork to fulfill its December promise to add roughly 66,000 EVs into the mail fleet. With the Environmental Protection Agency, Biden administration, and corporate media all turning up the pressure, you could call this an appeasement. But it’s also fair to say that the USPS initially made it seem like it would be utilizing a lot more EVs than it eventually decided.


None of the vans are slated for active duty before December, as they have to be assembled in Kansas City and modified for the Postal Service. But they’ll be standard E-Transits internally – offering a 266-horsepower electric motor, rear-wheel drive, and a modest range of just 126 miles. As those forthcoming Fords will need a place to recharge overnight, the USPS has also confirmed it has ordered 14,000 charging stations from a trio of suppliers.


While it sounds as though the Postal Service has caved to the pressure, things are substantially more complicated.


As part of the E-Transit announcement, the USPS said it would likewise be purchasing an equal number of gasoline-powered vehicles from Stellantis – which is almost assuredly going to be the Ram ProMaster. Meanwhile, Congress passed a bill earmarking $50 billion in financial relief (over 10 years) for the USPS at the start of 2022. The White House followed up with an announcement of its own in December, stating that $3 billion in funding from the Inflation Reduction Act would go to the Postal Service so it could electrify 66,000 delivery vehicles and help the Biden administration keep its promise to eventually make all government vehicles EVs.


[Image: Jonathan Weiss/Shutterstock]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 53 comments
  • Cprescott Cprescott on Mar 06, 2023

    Maybe this is a good use of golf cart technology. Short stops and starts. But not for a passenger vehicle that has to run 20-80% charge range (never mentioned in the amount that it diminishes the actual range of a golf cart by their manufacturers).

    • VoGhost VoGhost on Mar 06, 2023

      You don't get to tell us what we can buy with our own money.


  • Wjtinfwb Wjtinfwb on Mar 07, 2023

    Even a blind squirrel finds a nut occasionally.... why the USPS went down the road of a bespoke vehicle, and an ICE one at that when plenty of commercially available products already exist I don't understand. TransitConnects and ProMaster City vans are both built in RHD configs for other markets and could easily be made available in the US on a fleet purchase. They're cheap, dependable, rugged and available. Clearly making no sense for the Post Office. For longer or larger routes, ICE or EV Transits. Sprinters or ProMasters are available in a huge range of configurations; short, mid and long wheelbases, low, mid and high roofs, etc. All three are available in RHD configurations as well. My local smaller market Post Office uses a Heinz 57 approach; LLV's, ProMasters, Caravans, MB Metris, MB Sprinter. Any would be a more cost effective and readily available alternative to having Grumman design, build and support a bespoke vehicle. But, it's the Post Office, who'd expect them to make a rational and practical business decision.

  • Varezhka I have still yet to see a Malibu on the road that didn't have a rental sticker. So yeah, GM probably lost money on every one they sold but kept it to boost their CAFE numbers.I'm personally happy that I no longer have to dread being "upgraded" to a Maxima or a Malibu anymore. And thankfully Altima is also on its way out.
  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
  • GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
  • Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
  • Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.
Next