Elon Musk Tweet Leads to Investigation of Tesla

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey

Stop me if you've heard this before -- Elon Musk tweeted something that has him and/or one of his companies in trouble with regulators.


From CNN: The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration confirmed Monday that it is in contact with Tesla about Musk’s tweet in which he “agreed” that Tesla drivers should be allowed to disable the alert reminding them to keep their hands on the steering wheel while in “Full Self Driving” mode, which is a driver assist system in an early “beta” version that does not fully drive the car itself.

On December 31, Musk  replied to a  tweet by @WholeMarsBlog that said “users with more than 10,000 miles on FSD Beta should be given the option to turn off the steering wheel nag.”

“Agreed, update coming in Jan,” Musk replied.

NHTSA says the issue falls under the agency’s  existing investigation into the performance of Tesla’s driver assist systems.

“The investigation opening was motivated by an accumulation of crashes in which Tesla vehicles, operating with Autopilot engaged, struck stationary in-road or roadside first responder vehicles tending to pre-existing collision scenes,” reads the summary of the investigation which opened in June.

The federal inquiry into the tweet was first reported by the Associated Press.

So to recap: Tesla sycophant @WholeMarsBlog suggested that the FSD system lose one of its safety backups -- a system that uses pressure sensors in the steering wheel to make sure a driver is ready to take over if need be -- if the user had accumulated 10,000 miles of using the system. Musk seemed to agree.

Allow me to editorialize further: From a safety perspective, that's not great!

Once again, shouting this from the rooftops: THERE ARE NO SELF-DRIVING CARS FOR SALE TODAY.

I'm not a Luddite or necessarily anti-autonomous driving, but it seems like an unsafe idea to pull back on safety systems when it comes to these semi-autonomous driving systems. Especially when NHTSA is investigating how well these systems work.

Meanwhile, Jalopnik reports that this news broke on the same day that Tesla announced it would be more lenient when it comes to suspending users who are Full-Self Driving Beta testers. In the past, Tesla would boot drivers who weren't attentive enough for six months, now it will just be two weeks. Drivers get repeated warnings via the safety systems before they get the boot. Tesla also opened the program up to all drivers in November -- previously, they had to pass a safety test.

In summary, Tesla seems to be reducing safety backups for its system as it comes under investigation -- and as crashes mount. Insider reports over 750 incidents of unplanned hard braking, as one example.

Meanwhile, a Tesla stopped unexpectedly on San Francisco's Bay Bridge and caused an eight-car pileup that injured a child. Video at the link.

Maybe, just maybe, and hear me out here, we should hit the brakes (pun fully intended) on having customers be beta testers while also reducing safety backups? For the safety of all road users?

My apologies for editorializing a news piece more than I normally do, but it's so tiring to see Musk be so careless regarding the safety not only of Tesla drivers and passengers but the rest of us on the road.

[Image: Tesla]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 10 comments
  • Mike1041 Mike1041 on Jan 10, 2023

    The man is intent on bankrupting himself it would seem

  • Vulpine Vulpine on Jan 11, 2023

    Just one note on that San Francisco pileup:


    After the crash, the operator of the vehicle CLAIMED he was using FSD, however, the police department investigating the crash did not take the driver's word for it and is withholding judgement until they can access the car's data for themselves; it is not a proven incident at this time, as far as I know.


  • Slavuta "The accused companies include Toyota, Nissan, Subaru, Volkswagen, BMW, Mazda, Mercedes-Benz and Kia"May be I am paranoid but all the manufacturers here are from US vassal states occupied by US forces. And I believe, this is not a coincidence.
  • Tassos Ans: ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.I don't want to know anything about any other poor man's BMW Mazda either.
  • Tassos Ford is losing $100,000 for each EV it sells.Socially Promoted, Affirmtive Action hire Mary Barra does not disclose the corresponding number for GM. Maybe it is even worse? It sure is not zero.
  • Tassos Worthless, senile, serial liar, Idiot Joe Biden managed to shoot himself, GM and FORD all in the foot with his IDIOTIC Tariff.GM and FORD (this is not my opinion, watch AUTOLINE DAILY TODAY) will be those who will hurt the most by Idiot Joe Biden's tariff.
  • Bd2 Affluent "Van Life" individuals have been taking a serious look at adapting the KIA EV9 thanks to it's versatile capacity, class leading range and durability. Expect to see these making coast to coast round trip journeys this summer.
Next