Bits & Bytes: Toyota Shutdown Caused by Insufficient Disk Space

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

The cause of a recent blip in production for one of the world’s largest automakers has been traced to problems with computer memory. Yes, you read that correctly.


When most of us get an error alerting about lack of disk space, it generally means we can’t take any more pictures of the car with our phone or are unable to install the latest updates for Snowrunner. For Toyota, the problem was slightly more dire, as the issue shut down production at no fewer than fourteen different facilities – basically all its operations in Japan.


Calling it a “malfunction in our production order system” which happened at the end of last month, regular maintenance work apparently created the snafu. During that procedure, computer data that had accumulated in the company database was being deleted and/or organized when an error is said to have occurred due to insufficient disk space. This caused the system to grind to a halt. A similar failure then supposedly happened in the backup function, preventing a switchover and leading to the suspension of domestic plant operations.


How’d they fix it? By transferring the data to a server with a larger capacity, of course. We imagine frenzied Toyota IT people running out to Staples and buying up all the external hard drives. Good to know multi-zillion dollar companies face some of the same problems as the rest of us.


Toyota’s statement goes on to say “We would like to report that we have identified the above as the true cause,” which cynics would suggest is exactly what someone would say if they haven’t actually identified the true cause at all. The PR machine was also quick to ward off speculation this was the work of bad actors, saying “We would also like to reaffirm that the system malfunction was not caused by a cyberattack.” Very good, then.


In the meantime, your author will be over he backing up the hard drive on his laptop, just in case.


[Image: Toyota]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
7 of 19 comments
  • FreedMike FreedMike on Sep 07, 2023

    Off topic, but this brings to mind my favorite company IT fail story.


    Back in the day, I worked at a very large telecom company (hint: it's the one whose CEO came within days of dying in prison, a situation that disappointed me to no end because he deserved to meet his good buddy Jesus behind bars). We had an IT guy who wanted to get fired. So he decided to write up a dirty joke (complete with the f-word in the subject line) involving elephants and other animals, and sent it to the super-secret "employee all" address. So everyone - including said CEO who almost died in prison - got this email, including me. That was about 50,000 recipients.


    I chuckled for a moment and thought "well, this guy's getting s**tcanned," and deleted the message. I didn't think much of it until my inbox started filling up with messages like "that's disgusting", or "hahahaha," which went on for about a minute, at which point the "don't hit the 'reply all' button" messages (sent by people who hit the 'reply all' button) began, followed by "you idiot - you told him not to reply to all with the 'reply all' button" messages. Geometric progression, baby!


    By the time the system completely crashed a few minutes later, and took our intranet with it, I had several tens of thousands of emails in my Outlook...and rising. I got to go home early. Our systems weren't back up until much later that night.


    I'd love to have bought that IT guy a beer.

    • See 4 previous
    • FreedMike FreedMike on Sep 08, 2023

      "I don't even know how that would work."

      Well, it won't, but this guy didn't know that. Assuming, of course, the talk around the campfire was correct. Office rumors...





  • Jeff Jeff on Sep 07, 2023

    Toyota does not just have production problems. It is not the best time to buy a Toyota especially since their US distributors and dealers have their own markups in addition to the equipment they add onto the price. Toyota sells their vehicles in the US thru distributors to dealers. There are many Toyota dealerships marking prices of new Toyotas in excess of 10k. This has resulted in many loyal Toyota owners buying other brands instead of Toyotas.

  • Varezhka I have still yet to see a Malibu on the road that didn't have a rental sticker. So yeah, GM probably lost money on every one they sold but kept it to boost their CAFE numbers.I'm personally happy that I no longer have to dread being "upgraded" to a Maxima or a Malibu anymore. And thankfully Altima is also on its way out.
  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
  • GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
  • Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
  • Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.
Next