Junkyard Find: 2002 Daewoo Nubira SE Sedan

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

After 16 years of writing about junkyard vehicles, I've come to appreciate the marques that have so few models sold in the United States that I can capture the entire span of their offerings in the automotive marketplace, just by visiting my local Ewe Pullets enough times. Daihatsu sold but two models here. Sterling had two. Merkur also had two. Daihatsu, however, sold three car models during its three years in the United States. We saw a discarded example of the entry-level Daewoo subcompact, the Lanos, a couple of months back. Five years ago, we admired the Daewoo luxury sedan, the Leganza. Today, it's the turn of the third member of the 2000-2002 Daweoo triumvirate: The compact Nubira, an example of which I found in a Denver self-service yard last week.

The Nubira was supposed to compete against such affordable machinery as the Chevy Cavalier and Toyota Corolla. For a brief period, it seemed that such a dream might be possible.

The 2002 Nubira SE (the base trim level) had an MSRP of $11,699, or about $16,419 in 2023 dollars.

Just about the final vestiges of passion and mechanical competence had been squeezed from the Chevrolet Cavalier by 2002 (after two decades of J-Body sales), but the price of the Cavalier was pretty good: $14,035 for the cheapest possible four-door version ($19,697 today).

That's right, the Nubira cost $2,336 less than the Cavalier, which amounts to $3,278 in today's American dollars).

If you wanted a Corolla sedan in 2002 America, you had to pay $14,170 for the most stripped-down possible Corolla CE (Cheap Edition).

So the point of the Nubira was that you could get a Corolla-sized car for a price closer to that of the wretched Hyundai Accent.

North Americans had been buying Daewoos for quite some time by the 2000s, with the 1988-1993 Pontiac LeMans (United States) and the Asüna GT/ Passport Optima (Canada) paving the way for Daewoo-badged machinery.

There were problems. The CEO of Daewoo fled South Korea in 1999 to avoid criminal charges, the company went bankrupt in 2000, and the bad news for Daewoo just kept coming as the new century began.

Before Kim Woo-Chong went on the lam, he thought up a brilliant idea for selling Daewoos in the United States: Get college students to be Daewoo "Campus Advisors," loan them free cars, and have them pitch the Daewoo brand to their fellow students.

This worked about as well as you'd have expected, and so Daewoo left North America in 2002. After that, the Pep Boys were hired to handle warranty service on all those very affordable Leganzas, Nubiras, and Lanoses.

This car just squeezed past the 100,000-mile mark during its 21 years on the road.

The engine is a 2.0-liter DOHC four-banger rated at 129 horsepower.

The base transmission was a five-speed manual, but the original purchaser of this Nubira splashed out an additional 800 bucks for the automatic (that's around $1,123 in today's bucks)

The interior of this car looks pretty good, but depreciation for Daewoos happened quickly once the company fled our continent.

It looks like a fairly minor wreck took it out of the rat race for good.

We continued to buy new Daewoos after 2002, but they bore the badges of other brands. The next-generation Nubira appeared here with Suzuki Reno badges in 2005. The revised Lanos came back as the 2004 Chevy Aveo. Even the new Leganza returned in 2004, as the Suzuki Verona.

You'll need to suspend some disbelief here.

[Images: The Author]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 24 comments
  • Bobbysirhan Bobbysirhan on Apr 18, 2023

    Daewoo couldn't make it as a start-up. Their rebadged products killed off Suzuki as a US market car brand. Putting Chevy and Buick badges on them made for happy customers though, since GM buyers expect so little.

    • William William on Apr 23, 2023

      Daewoo was not a startup. They had been around since the 60s. In 2001 GM bought Daewoo and kept the brand going around the world... but not in the US. They actually cut the US arm of Daewoo off, so all the "dealers" were left without cars to sell, and there were a few lawsuits that went nowhere. Yes, Suzuki had to sell rebadged Daewoos, but they were long out of the lineup by 2012. By then it was just the SX4, Kizashi, and Grand Vitara. Suzuki had other issues effecting their exit from the US (although I own a Kizashi and it's a darn good car).

  • William William on Apr 23, 2023

    You missed the most interesting part of Daewoo US history. In 2001 GM bought Daewoo, but left the US part of it out of the deal. They kept the brand going around the world... but not in the US. They actually cut the US arm of Daewoo off, so all the "dealers" were left without cars to sell, and there were a few lawsuits that went nowhere.


    Now, they are known as GM Korea and produce Chevys (Trax and Trailblazer plus parts of the Bolt) and Buicks (Encore and Envista) for the US market.

    • 28-Cars-Later 28-Cars-Later on Apr 23, 2023

      This is true, thought they are still Daewoo (now matter what GM says) and it shows.


  • Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.
  • Wjtinfwb Not proud of what Stellantis is rolling out?
  • Wjtinfwb Absolutely. But not incredibly high-tech, AWD, mega performance sedans with amazing styling and outrageous price tags. GM needs a new Impala and LeSabre. 6 passenger, comfortable, conservative, dead nuts reliable and inexpensive enough for a family guy making 70k a year or less to be able to afford. Ford should bring back the Fusion, modernized, maybe a bit bigger and give us that Hybrid option again. An updated Taurus, harkening back to the Gen 1 and updated version that easily hold 6, offer a huge trunk, elevated handling and ride and modest power that offers great fuel economy. Like the GM have a version that a working mom can afford. The last decade car makers have focused on building cars that American's want, but eliminated what they need. When a Ford Escape of Chevy Blazer can be optioned up to 50k, you've lost the plot.
  • Willie If both nations were actually free market economies I would be totally opposed. The US is closer to being one, but China does a lot to prop up the sectors they want to dominate allowing them to sell WAY below cost, functionally dumping their goods in our market to destroy competition. I have seen this in my area recently with shrimp farmed by Chinese comglomerates being sold super cheap to push local producers (who have to live at US prices and obey US laws) out of business.China also has VERY lax safety and environmental laws which reduce costs greatly. It isn't an equal playing field, they don't play fair.
  • Willie ~300,000 Camrys and ~200,000 Accords say there is still a market. My wife has a Camry and we have no desire for a payment on something that has worse fuel economy.
Next