Snow Fooling: What We Learned Playing in the Powder

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey

As a lifelong Snow Belter, I’ve long considered myself a fairly good snow driver – and I’ve long understood the need for winter tires, even over all-seasons in some cases. A recent trip to the ski town of Steamboat Springs, Colorado, courtesy of Bridgestone, confirmed some of what I already knew – and taught me some new things in the process.

For example, one can be a pretty good snow driver, and yet be pretty far from excellent. More on that in a bit.

(Full disclosure: Bridgestone paid for my flight, lodging, and meals. The company offered a very nice winter coat that I declined. This event is completely separate from the tire giveaway we did in January, though some of the same people from both Bridgestone and TTAC worked on both projects.)

Bridgestone has a winter-driving school set up just outside of Steamboat Springs, and you, too, can attend, if you can swing the tuition (airfare and lodging not included). You must, of course, attend during the winter months, for obvious reasons. During the summer, the test track turns into farmland.

Pricing, if you are wondering, starts around $300.

Normally Bridgestone uses Toyotas to train customers – from novice to expert, from Sun Belt resident to Steamboat ski bunny – on how best to drive on ice and snow. Corollas, Camrys, and 4Runners, I was told. For this week, though, we’d be hopping into Acura MDXs and NSXs. Yes, you read that right. Six-figure sports cars with all-wheel drive.

We ran through several exercises in car control. There was a skidpad, to help us play with under- and oversteer. We did a lane-change exercise, and also an exercise that helped us focus on braking in a straight line, before turning, so that we could corner without the brakes or throttle engaged (we’ll get into the “why” further down in this piece).

We also “hot lapped” an 11-turn track (that included part of the skidpad) that had a surface of snow and ice – and hard-packed snowbanks serving as the barrier walls. Goal number one – don’t tag a snowbank.

Thankfully, I did not, though I came close once or twice. Nor did anyone else tag one, that I know of. Though an instructor spun an NSX during demo laps performed at the end of the day – laps that gave us a chance to ride right-seat and see how the pros handled the track.

The whole purpose of our playing in the snow was multi-fold: Improve car-control techniques and also compare all-season tires to winters. As well as see how proper footwear can help even a supercar in the snow. And, of course, all the rubber was from Bridgestone, so if the brand could convince us scribes that its tires are the best, well, so much the better for them.

I won’t go as far as to say that. Not only because we at TTAC are not shills (no matter how much of some of y’all think we are) but also because there was no competing brand on hand for comparison.

What I will say is this – even if you have years of experience driving in snow and think you handle it well, a school like this will help you. It doesn’t have to be Bridgestone’s school – a quick Google shows there are other winter-driving schools out there, including from the famed Skip Barber school. There’s one at the Road America racetrack in Wisconsin, as well. Similarly, I also walked away understanding that while all-season tires can get the job done, winter tires are probably going to be better.

No shit, Sherlock, I know. But it’s one thing to know something, and another to actually experience it.

The biggest thing that I learned when it comes to snow driving is something I already sort of knew but had never really articulated: Road conditions change constantly when there is snow or ice on them, and one must constantly adjust his or her driving line. I’ve done this for years, automatically, without realizing it, and it makes sense when you actually sit down and think it through.

When you get on a track and find that as the sun hits and the temperature changes, and as other cars traverse the ground before you do, the line changes. Completely. You need to change where you place the car, your speed, your braking points, maybe even the turn-in – everything.

I admit that I struggled with this a bit. I went out slow to get a feel for the track and got in a groove, and then things started going a bit sideways (mostly figuratively, a little bit literally). There were two reasons why my later laps weren’t as smooth as my earlier ones.

Reason number one is I got a bit overconfident and started driving faster. This may sound counterintuitive, but slowing down would have led to smoother laps – and if they’d have been timed, ones with faster times. Going too fast and/or braking too late led to slides, and while I was able to rein them in, slides still cost speed (and time). The penalty for going too fast on the straightaway – for those wondering, my drive partner and I saw speeds in the 50s, one journo claimed to hit 60 – was either a slide or a bad line or both through the next corner.

Indeed, the closest I came to stuffing a car occurred in the first turn after the main straight – arguably the easiest turn – because I came in a bit hot, braked late, and started to understeer. Eventually, I slowed enough that the rear end came around as I released the brakes.

Remember how I referenced the exercise that focused on braking before turning and being off the brakes while cornering (which we actually did near the day’s end)? It’s a reminder that asking the car to turn while under braking or throttle can end up asking too much of it. Yes, there are exceptions for trail-braking and for accelerating out of corners, but some of that stuff is best suited for dry pavement. Slick surfaces are different.

In this case, releasing the brakes helped the car turn. Indeed, at times, a judicious application of throttle could induce oversteer and help bring the car – these MDXs had Acura’s SH-AWD all-wheel-drive system – around.

The other thing that killed my lapping is that I let myself get locked into a mentality of trying to brake and turn-in at the same spot each lap. This is ideal on a dry track, but not in the snow and ice. Indeed, early on, I was doing fairly well as I moved the car over a foot or two to get more grip. But for whatever reason (probably just lack of familiarity with the track), I let myself lock in on certain markers for braking and turn in, staying with them even as the surface changed. This caused me to slide around more and to lose speed. Lesson learned – be flexible with car placement when driving on curvy roads covered in snow and ice. And slow down. And brake earlier.

The point of the previous few paragraphs isn’t to point out what I did or didn’t do well, but rather to show how doing X can lead to result Y. Slow down, adjust your line, brake earlier, be smooth on the controls and you’ll be a better winter driver, whether just commuting on a snow-covered back road or doing some winter racing on a closed course.

Drive like it’s dry, and you’ll be sliding – or worse.

Snow Tires Vs. All-Seasons

After lunch, I took the Acura NSX around with a right-side rider. Shod with Bridgestone Potenzas (RE980AS+, to be exact), the AWD NSX handled the snow just fine, and it was fun getting the rear end to step out into controlled slides with the right application of the throttle on corner exit.

Just a reminder – the NSX uses two electric motors at the front, motors that independently drive the left and right wheels, as part of its Super Handling All-Wheel Drive (SH-AWD) system.

It was pretty easy to drive the NSX in the snow – just brake at the right time, let off, turn in, then slowly get on the gas, and use a little extra throttle to summon oversteer if need be.

Fun, but not the instructive part of the day. What I found most useful was the comparison of MDXs shod with Alenza AS Ultras versus those shoed with Blizzak DM-V2s. It wasn’t hard to predict that the Blizzaks would offer a lot more grip, which resulted in shorter braking distances, easier cornering, and less sliding. Yet it was still illustrative to see the difference between true snow tires and all-seasons. The vehicles shed with the Alenzas were just more of a handful during braking and cornering, and there was a lot more sliding around.

Again, this isn’t to suggest the Bridgestone tires are better or worse than the competition – there was no competitive set on hand for comparison. I can’t tell you if the Blizzaks are better or worse than what Michelin or Goodyear offers. I can tell you that if you plan on driving on snowy surfaces a lot, you probably should consider investing in snows from someone. Though all-seasons will still be better than summers or three-seasons.

On the way home, I kept thinking about what I truly learned. I knew how understeer and oversteer worked already – I learned that before I ever drove a car. I already knew that asking your car to do 100 percent of any one thing at any one time – be it braking, turning, or accelerating – tends to lead to trouble. And I understood intuitively, even if I’d never thought too deeply about it before, that one must adjust for driving in the snow and ice.

I also knew a correctly timed gentle application of oversteer can sometimes help you get around a turn, and snow tires are better suited for this kind of surface than all-seasons.

Yet I still learned some things. Or, at least, I gained real-world experience that confirmed what I knew intellectually. It’s still instructive to spend time working on wheel placement/braking point/turn-in point in a controlled setting like this. It’s still instructive to actually see and feel the difference between snow tires and all-season rubber instead of looking at specs on a chart.

If you can, take a winter driving class, whether through Bridgestone or someone else. And if your commute and/or vehicle type demands you consider snow tires, definitely do so.

Playing in the snow is fun. Knowing how to keep safe when driving in it is even better.

[Images © 2022 Tim Healey/TTAC]

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 39 comments
  • Vvk Vvk on Feb 09, 2022

    Last Friday I was driving my RWD sedan (M-Sport 550i) in Stowe, VT. We got two feet of snow. My Hakka R3 winter tires made it safe and fun. My friend was driving an AWD SUV with all-season tires. He got stuck twice. Cost him $150. Twice.

  • Tele Vision Tele Vision on Feb 09, 2022

    I run the General Grabber AT2s on my truck. They're seven years old and only now need rotating. They are utter pucks on hard pack and ice but great on snowy gravel and loose pack. I occasionally need to punch through 2' foot drifts on the way to work ( to plow said drifts with a 160M ) and they perform admirably. CDN$1150 all in seven years ago and they're not even half-worn yet. A burning issue around here is the use of 4X4 in trucks. Some guys use 4X4 to get out of trouble. Other guys use 4X4 to stay out of trouble. I'm in the latter camp.

    • Lou_BC Lou_BC on Feb 10, 2022

      I'll run 4x2 mode unless roads are bad. Then I'll use 4x4. I do the same in the backcountry when I'm alone. 4x4 is my escape mode. Play wheeling with others is a different story.

  • Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).
  • B-BodyBuick84 Not afraid of AV's as I highly doubt they will ever be %100 viable for our roads. Stop-and-go downtown city or rush hour highway traffic? I can see that, but otherwise there's simply too many variables. Bad weather conditions, faded road lines or markings, reflective surfaces with glare, etc. There's also the issue of cultural norms. About a decade ago there was actually an online test called 'The Morality Machine' one could do online where you were in control of an AV and choose what action to take when a crash was inevitable. I think something like 2.5 million people across the world participated? For example, do you hit and most likely kill the elderly couple strolling across the crosswalk or crash the vehicle into a cement barrier and almost certainly cause the death of the vehicle occupants? What if it's a parent and child? In N. America 98% of people choose to hit the elderly couple and save themselves while in Asia, the exact opposite happened where 98% choose to hit the parent and child. Why? Cultural differences. Asia puts a lot of emphasis on respecting their elderly while N. America has a culture of 'save/ protect the children'. Are these AV's going to respect that culture? Is a VW Jetta or Buick Envision AV going to have different programming depending on whether it's sold in Canada or Taiwan? how's that going to effect legislation and legal battles when a crash inevitibly does happen? These are the true barriers to mass AV adoption, and in the 10 years since that test came out, there has been zero answers or progress on this matter. So no, I'm not afraid of AV's simply because with the exception of a few specific situations, most avenues are going to prove to be a dead-end for automakers.
  • Mike Bradley Autonomous cars were developed in Silicon Valley. For new products there, the standard business plan is to put a barely-functioning product on the market right away and wait for the early-adopter customers to find the flaws. That's exactly what's happened. Detroit's plan is pretty much the opposite, but Detroit isn't developing this product. That's why dealers, for instance, haven't been trained in the cars.
  • Dartman https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-fighter-jets-air-force-6a1100c96a73ca9b7f41cbd6a2753fdaAutonomous/Ai is here now. The question is implementation and acceptance.
  • FreedMike If Dodge were smart - and I don't think they are - they'd spend their money refreshing and reworking the Durango (which I think is entering model year 3,221), versus going down the same "stuff 'em full of motor and give 'em cool new paint options" path. That's the approach they used with the Charger and Challenger, and both those models are dead. The Durango is still a strong product in a strong market; why not keep it fresher?
Next