2005 Chevrolet Cavalier, Last Gasp of the J Platform Edition

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin
The General built cars on the J Platform for a quarter-century, and J-based machines could be bought new with badges from just about every marque in the far-flung GM Empire. Yes, South Koreans drove Daewoo Esperos, Brits drove Vauxhall Cavaliers, Aussies drove Holden Camiras, and even the Japanese could buy Isuzu Askas and Toyota Cavaliers. In North America, nearly every marque offered J-Bodies at some point… and in the end, the very final Js were Chevy Cavaliers and Pontiac Sunfires. Here’s one of those end-of-the-line cars, found in a Denver yard a few months ago.
By 2005, the J platform had attained levels of obsolescence undreamed-of even by Lee Iacocca with Chrysler’s K platform, which went into production about the same time as the GM J but got the axe in the middle 1990s. By the end, just a handful were being built and most went to thin-walleted fleet buyers; it took me many months of searching to find a 2005 J in a junkyard.
Most low-trim-level Cavaliers got the pushrod 122 engine, developed specifically for use in the J-Cars, while the factory-hot-rod Z24s received various members of the 60° V6 family or screaming DOHC Quad-4s. The 122 got dumped after 2003, with the 2.2-liter Ecotec getting bolted into all 2004 and 2005 Cavaliers. Since the Ecotec has proven to be the most reliable engine ever installed in a J-Body, ’04s and ’05s should be the most sought-after today (they aren’t).
While a 5-speed manual transmission was standard Cavalier equipment in the early 2000s, nearly all post-mid-1980s Cavalier shoppers paid extra for the automatic transmission. This car has a not-so-futuristic-in-2005 four-speed automatic; low-end Cavalier shoppers got three-speed slushboxes as late as the 2001 model year.
I believe the trade name for this fabric was sac de jute de pommes de terre, and it was dandy for removal of car-renter bodily fluids via the water-hose and wire brush technique.
Still, even cheapo mid-2010s Detroit cars came with CD players in their base-level cars (the AUX jack came later).
Fittingly enough, this car spends its last days parked next to another final-model-year GM machine, painted in a color quite similar to ’05 Chevy Victory Red ( known as Bright Red in the ever-contracting 2009 Pontiac universe): a 2009 Pontiac G3. The G3 was a one-year-only version of the Daewoo-built Chevy Aveo, so it wasn’t around for the demise of Pontiac in 2010.
It’s safe to say that not everybody was talking about the Ecotec-powered Cavaliers, but at least GM paid to advertise the final version to civilian buyers.For links to better than 2,000 additional Junkyard Finds, visit the Junkyard Home of the Murilee Martin Lifestyle Brand™.
Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 47 comments
  • Canam23 Canam23 on Feb 08, 2021

    What always bothered me about the J cars was their terrible crash ratings. I had a friend who was pretty badly hurt in a relatively minor crash in one of these.All the more frightening considering how many people put their teenagers in them as first cars.

    • See 1 previous
    • Mustangfast Mustangfast on Feb 19, 2021

      I had to drive one of these for drivers Ed. It’s amazing how that car was almost brand new yet was terrible in every way compared to either my parents late 90s Villager and Escort, or my soon to be 80s Volkswagen. I lived not terribly far from where these disasters were made, and there were so many “buy local” people who had these because they were American, but not because they were any good.

  • JRED JRED on Feb 09, 2021

    A neighbor had two of these maybe 4-5 years ago. One never moved, guessing it was purchased for parts, the other ran, badly, for a little while. One day while driving past I noticed the hood up on the running one, with a couple guys working on it. I stopped in to see if they needed any help/tools (I maintain my own cars and have accumulated a lot of stuff to that end), and it turned out they were replacing the headgasket. Having done that job before, I was a little concerned by the big pile of nuts/bolts on the base of the windshield, but hey, maybe it wasn't their first time? A day or so later the car was back on the road, but not for long. It wound up parked in the driveway for a few months. Then one day I was working in the yard and heard loud banging, like someone hammering something. I noticed some teenagers in the street in front of my house looking pretty concerned, their attention focused toward the Cavalier house. I asked if they were alright, and one replied "He lost it man, he crazy!" in reference to Cavalier owner. Said owner was beating one of the Cavaliers with an aluminum baseball bat, leaving taillights smashed, panels dented. Didn't touch the glass for some reason though. Couple more months, rollback hauled off both Cavaliers. Since then, I think I've seen as many 2nd gen Cavaliers as I have 3rd gens. Which is to say, maybe 1 of each. A friend in high school had an '02 model in yellow, with the Ecotec engine. He ran the hell out of that thing and it took it well for at least a few years. He participated in some of the import meets that were popular at that time, and claimed the car acquitted itself well against Civics etc. in stoplight races.

  • Varezhka I have still yet to see a Malibu on the road that didn't have a rental sticker. So yeah, GM probably lost money on every one they sold but kept it to boost their CAFE numbers.I'm personally happy that I no longer have to dread being "upgraded" to a Maxima or a Malibu anymore. And thankfully Altima is also on its way out.
  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
  • GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
  • Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
  • Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.
Next