2021 Hyundai Elantra/Elantra N First Drive: Opt for the Ridiculous

Chad Kirchner
by Chad Kirchner

While the world seems to be abandoning small cars, Hyundai is committed to making them and making them great. How great? We spent some time in the entire lineup of Elantras recently to find out, including special access to the new Hyundai Elantra N.

(Full disclosure: Hyundai wanted me to drive the new Elantra so they flew me to Los Angeles, secluded me in a hotel room, and only let me out to drive the cars, including a couple of solid hours in the Elantra N prototype.)

The mainstream Elantra is powered by a 2.0-liter four-banger making 147 horsepower and 132 lb-ft of torque. Hyundai brands it as Smartstream, and it’s paired to a continuously variable transmission. Power runs to the front wheels. The standard car also makes do with a torsion beam rear suspension.

While most looking at this car aren’t looking at it for driving excitement or engagement, the Elantra sedan is reasonably adept at handling the twisty roads around Malibu. The car feels plenty powerful for the daily commute, and the transmission isn’t as sloppy as some CVTs I’ve driven. I wouldn’t seek out a twisty road with it, but if I happened to stumble across one there are worse cars to be in.

The Elantra is available with loads of tech, including two digital displays (one for the infotainment and one for the instrument cluster) and features Hyundai’s advanced safety systems. Adaptive cruise and lane centering, mated to Hyundai’s highway driving assistance program, make the Elantra a capable long-distance cruiser. In fact, I’d venture to say that Hyundai’s lane-keeping is more intuitive and has fewer false alarms than even Tesla’s standard Autopilot setup.

And before the Tesla fans rip me in the comments, I have a Tesla Model 3 that I have access to daily.

The trunk can swallow up 14.2 cubic feet of luggage, which isn’t bad for the class. While I would prefer the car in hatchback form, the sedan is capable of delivering what most people need. In the Limited trim that I sampled, the EPA rates the fuel economy at 31 mpg in the city, 41 mpg on the highway, or 35 mpg combined.

If you want more MPGs, you’re going to want to upgrade to the Elantra Hybrid. It’s powered by a 1.6-liter Atkinson Cycle engine making a total output of 139 horsepower and 195 lb-ft of torque. Power is also sent to the front wheels, but this time via a six-speed dual clutch automatic. Additionally, and thankfully, on the hybrid the rear suspension gets a multi-link independent setup.

There are more options available on the hybrid, including ventilated seats on the Limited Hybrid. Trunk space remains the same on the hybrid.

Around town, it’s a competent cruiser. On the highway, there’s a bit more cabin noise than I’d like, and the seats are a bit hard for longer journeys. I’m not sure why seats would be different in the gas model compared to the hybrid, but I assume it’s due to lightweighting efforts. Unfortunately, I couldn’t get as comfortable as I would’ve liked.

While I had every intention of hopping in the N-Line for the return trip to the hotel, a representative from Hyundai pulled me aside to let me know that I was to take one of the full Elantra N prototypes back to the hotel. Who was I to argue with that?

For the sake of being a completist, I’ll mention that the N-Line is available with a manual transmission, has the independent rear suspension, and makes a healthy 201 horsepower and 195 lb-ft from its turbo engine.

The Elantra N was completely wrapped in camouflage, which definitely attracts attention. It contains the same powertrain as the Veloster N, which means a turbo four making 276 horsepower and 289 lb-ft of torque. Power is sent to the front via either a six-speed manual transmission or an eight-speed wet dual-clutch automatic. My test car was equipped with the latter.

From the moment you press the engine start button, you know you’re in for a ride. The engine burbles to life, just like the Veloster, and there is a litany of driving settings you can change to make the engine louder and more obnoxious.

Blasting down Decker Canyon Road north of Malibu, the Elantra N impresses. No matter how fast you seem to be going, the car grips the road and brakes well. Turn-in is quick, but not darty as it can be on some higher-end cars. The transmission, left to its own devices, shifts quickly and nearly exactly when you want it.

It’s not as good as a Porsche PDK box — nothing is — but it’s far better than any transmission has any right to be in a commuter car turned road racer. I’d still go for the manual transmission but if you need the automatic, you won’t be disappointed.

The longer wheelbase compared to the Veloster helps both with high-speed stability and regular ride comfort. The car is still stiffly sprung, but it didn’t feel jittery. Comfort mode smooths a lot of it out, but it’s not Lexus smooth. It’s a bit easier to live with every day than the Veloster N.

Even if you’re putzing along in comfort mode and want to be aggressive for a few seconds, the Elantra N has an NGS button. Like a “push to pass” style button, the N Grin Shift mode puts the car in full attack mode for 20 seconds, and there’s even a countdown clock on the digital instrument cluster. Is it silly? Yes.

But the whole car is silly. From the minute I started driving it was laughing and giggling. It’s a truly fun car to drive. It’s not as precise as a Honda Civic Type R, but it takes itself way less seriously. But unlike a Fiat 500 Abarth, which is all giggle and no real solid performance, the Elantra N gets you about 90 percent of the way to the Civic Type R in performance.

It’s silly, but in all the right ways. It’s a daily driver that turns sports car. It’s loud. It’s raucous. It’s a hell of a lot of fun. Sign me up.

[Images: Hyundai and © 2020 Chad Kirchner/TTAC]

Chad Kirchner
Chad Kirchner

More by Chad Kirchner

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 20 comments
  • Inside Looking Out Inside Looking Out on Nov 16, 2020

    I would rather Kia Tellurude.

    • PeriSoft PeriSoft on Nov 18, 2020

      If Audi can make the SQ5 then I don't see why we can't get a Telluride N.

  • MorrisGray MorrisGray on Dec 13, 2020

    I am fully interested in this and the upcoming 2022 Civic models. I only want to buy a manual transmission car to replace the manual transmission sedan Mazda3 I have been driving since 2006! The current type R is too everything for me personally at 63 and I would prefer a sedan over a hatchback period. But manufacturers need to get these kind of models to all of their dealers. We can't buy them logically if they are not within a hundred miles radius. I live near Chattanooga and it is difficult to find manual transmission cars period. None currently available here with BMW, VW, Genesis, Hyundai, Kia, or Dodge. Wow!

  • NJRide Let Cadillac be Cadillac, but in the context of 2024. As a new XT5 owner (the Emerald Green got me to buy an old design) I would have happy preferred a Lyriq hybrid. Some who really like the Lyriq's package but don't want an EV will buy another model. Most will go elsewhere. I love the V6 and good but easy to use infotainment. But I know my next car will probably be more electrified w more tech.I don't think anyone is confusing my car for a Blazer but i agree the XT6 is too derivative. Frankly the Enclave looks more prestigious. The Escalade still has got it, though I would love to see the ESV make a comeback. I still think GM missed the boat by not making a Colorado based mini-Blazer and Escalade. I don't get the 2 sedans. I feel a slightly larger and more distinctly Cadillac sedan would sell better. They also need to advertise beyond the Lyriq. I don't feel other luxury players are exactly hitting it out of the park right now so a strengthened Cadillac could regain share.
  • CM Korecko Cadillacs traditionally have been opulent, brash and leaders in the field; the "Standard of the World".That said, here's how to fix the brand:[list=1][*]Forget German luxury cars ever existed.[/*][*]Get rid of the astromech droid names and bring back Seville, Deville, Eldorado, Fleetwood and Brougham.[/*][*]End the electric crap altogether and make huge, gas guzzling land yachts for the significant portion of the population that would fight for a chance to buy one.[/*][*]Stop making sports cars and make true luxury cars for those of us who don't give a damn about the environment and are willing to swim upstream to get what we really want.[/*][*]Stop messing around with technology and make well-made and luxurious interiors.[/*][*]Watch sales skyrocket as a truly different product distinguishes itself to the delight of the target market and the damnation of the Sierra Club. Hell, there is no such thing as bad publicity and the "bad guy" image would actually have a lot of appeal.[/*][/list=1]
  • FreedMike Not surprisingly, I have some ideas. What Cadillac needs, I think, is a statement. They don’t really have an identity. They’re trying a statement car with the Celestiq, and while that’s the right idea, it has the wrong styling and a really wrong price tag. So, here’s a first step: instead of a sedan, do a huge, fast, capable and ridiculously smooth and quiet electric touring coupe. If you want an example of what I’m thinking of, check out the magnificent Rolls-Royce Spectre. But this Cadillac coupe would be uniquely American, it’d be named “Eldorado,” and it’d be a lot cheaper than the $450,000 Spectre – call it a buck twenty-five, with a range of bespoke options for prospective buyers that would make each one somewhat unique. Make it 220 inches long, on the same platform as the Celestiq, give it retro ‘60s styling (or you could do a ‘50s or ‘70s throwback, I suppose), and at least 700 horsepower, standard. Why electric? It’s the ultimate throwback to ‘60s powertrains: effortlessly fast, smooth, and quiet, but with a ton more horsepower. It’s the perfect drivetrain for a dignified touring coupe. In fact, I’d skip any mention of environmental responsibility in this car’s marketing – sell it on how it drives, period.  How many would they sell? Not many. But the point of the exercise is to do something that will turn heads and show people what this brand can do.  Second step: give the lineup a mix of electric and gas models, and make Cadillac gas engines bespoke to the brand. If they need to use generic GM engine designs, fine – take those engines and massage them thoroughly into something special to Cadillac, with specific tuning and output. No Cadillac should leave the factory with an engine straight out of a Malibu or a four-banger Silverado. Third step: a complete line-wide interior redo. Stop the cheapness that’s all over the current sedans and crossovers. Just stop it. Use the Lyriq as a blueprint – it’s a big improvement over the current crop and a good first step. I’d also say Cadillac has a good blend of screen-controlled and switch-controlled user interfaces; don’t give into the haptic-touch and wall-to-wall screen thing. (On the subject of Caddy interiors – as much as I bag on the Celestiq, check out the interior on that thing. Wow.)Fourth step: Blackwing All The Things – some gas, others electric. And keep the electric/gas mix so buyers have a choice.Fifth step: be patient. That’s not easy, but if they’re doing a brand reset, it’ll take time. 
  • NJRide So if GM was serious about selling this why no updates for so long? Or make something truly unique instead of something that looked like a downmarket Altima?
  • Kmars2009 I rented one last fall while visiting Ohio. Not a bad car...but not a great car either. I think it needs a new version. But CUVs are King... unfortunately!
Next