Volkswagen Recalling 218,000 Jettas Over Fuel Leak Risk

by Matt Posky

Published: October 30th, 2020

volkswagen recalling 218 000 jettas over fuel leak risk

With so many automotive issues being “solved” with a software update and a wink of late, its nice to see a recall that harks back to the days where someone forgot to tighten a few bolts or had a delivery truck pull up to the factory with sub-optimal fasteners. According to documents filed with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Volkswagen has found itself in just such a pickle and will need to recall 218,192 Jetta sedans from the 2016-2018 model years.

The problem? Improperly torqued fuel rail bolts. The solution? Obvious.

Volkswagen explained in documents posted by the NHTSA on Wednesday that bolts responsible for holding down the high-pressure tubing can loosen over time, causing a fuel leak and potential fire hazard. Owners should be on the lookout for fuel seeping from beneath the engine compartment and on the smellout for the pleasant (but potentially dangerous) aroma of gasoline. VW is asking customers noticing either to contact their local dealer immediately and we’re advising against driving an automobile that seeping fuel.

While the Star Tribune initially reported that the manufacturer had no solution for the problem at the ready, it informed us on Friday that it would be having affected models brought in for inspection. However it looks as though every single unit will be getting new, properly torqued bolts. Volkswagen doesn’t want to take any risks and believes every one of the 218,000+ Jettas could be affected — though it did say it wasn’t aware of any fires or accidents stemming from the issue.

Problem vehicles should all have 1.4-liter motors but those who want to be doubly cautious can go to the NHTSA’s website and input their Vehicle Identification Number. Alternatively, customers can use the U.S. regulator’s campaign number (20V648) or dial Volkswagen’s customer service hotline at 1-888-241-2289 and use recall code 24GI. The recall is expected to begin in earnest on December 20th, with the manufacturer reaching out to customers directly.

[Image: VW]

#2018VolkswagenJetta #FuelLeak #Jetta #NHTSA #Recalls #SafetyRecall #Volkswagen #VolkswagenGroup #VW

Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments

Join the conversation

3 of 21 comments

Conundrum on Oct 30, 2020

Still don't trust VW. The 1.5l replacement for the 1.4 over in Europe has been out for while, and it is not good. Here's just one article: https://www.honestjohn.co.uk/news/new-cars/2019-07/no-end-in-sight-for-volkswagen-15-tsi-engine-problems/ It's just as well VW tries out its experiments at home, where unflagging faith in German products still somehow continues. Now we find out they can't even screw the old 1.4 together properly, literally. Keep your nose in shape and smell that fuel leakage! Infotainment crap galore to order toilet paper on the interwet, spy on you, add general uselessness that has nothing to do with driving, but hey, no sensor for fuel leakage. You're on your own!

A Rose by Any Other Name

Like Reply
Speedlaw on Nov 01, 2020

So far, my ace of base Jetta S has turned 40k miles. No issues, and the base 2017 has the IRS, not beam axle, which was lost with the new MQB base car. The 1.4 is an excellent engine for the output-super low NVH, and 35 mpg all day. Once I'm out of powertrain warranty (50k) it's getting a tune, 147 hp > 180 hp. The only thing I needed to do was replace the abysmal hard plastic Bridgstone Ecotopias with Cont DWS 06 on the OE steelies (you can go 225/50 with the same height as OE and you don't fear potholes) and now the car sticks like a VW should. I kept an M54 powered BMW on the road for 300k plus miles, so I get German cranky-ness and all the overengineered c#ap that breaks....but this particular Mexi-Jetta appears solid and hasn't taken anything not "by the book" so far. When things wear out I'll upgrade suspension bits but so far, no issues. I've had a bunch of VW's but when this came off lease the entire fam told me "we LOVE Blue" so I had to buy it. The 5 speed is a bonus.

Like Reply
- Inside Looking Out on Nov 01, 2020
  
  I don't want to mess with IRS. Anything but IRS. Thank you.
  
  Like

Recent Comments

Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.
Wjtinfwb Not proud of what Stellantis is rolling out?