NHTSA Launching Investigation Into Chevy Bolt Fires

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

According to the very people trying to sell them, electric vehicles are slated to become the hottest commodity on the automotive market since the Ford Pinto, Pontiac Fiero, or Ferrari 458 Italia. But, following a swath of highly publicized fires, there’s been this creeping narrative that there may be some unaddressed safety concerns pertaining to EVs. Numerous video clips of vehicles spontaneously combusting in Asia and local media reports of phantom garage fires in North America have helped feed the story, with regulators now taking accusations of battery flambé extremely seriously.

Case in point is the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s new investigation into the Chevrolet Bolt. The agency’s Office of Defects Investigation received just two complaints regarding 2018 and 2019 Bolts that were alleged to have caught fire in a similar manner. But lids were flipped when the NHTSA realized it had seen a 2017 model with a similar burn pattern working its way up through the rear seat. The group is now launching a preliminary evaluation to decide whether these were freak accidents or if the Chevy Bolt actually has a tendency to catch fire while nobody is around.

Since the mere suggestion of a specific model having safety issues is often all it takes to cement it into vehicular lore, we want to be extremely clear in saying there’s little proof of anything at this juncture. A handful of Bolts have caught fire under suspiciously similar circumstances and the NHTSA wants to make sure that it doesn’t pertain to the other 77,842 examples manufactured between 2017 and 2020.

It might also be nice for regulators to nip any EV fire hazards in the bud before they become the dominant form of personal conveyance. While reports of battery fires routinely get more media attention than the banged-up Buick Century I saw burning on the Henry Hudson Parkway over the weekend, there’s not supposed to be much of a difference in the frequency of gasoline and battery-related car fires. But regulators seem terrified that won’t remain true as more battery-driven vehicles enter the marketplace. Automakers are no less concerned because absolutely nobody wants to be the brand with the famously dangerous EVs.

General Motors informed us that it was aware of the preliminary examination and intended on cooperating with the investigation fully, as well as launching its own to make doubly sure there’s no doubt about what is/isn’t happening with the Bolt.

Automotive News, which first caught wind of investigation PE 20-016, said the NHTSA reported that “the fire damage appeared to be concentrated in the EV battery compartment area with penetration into the passenger compartment from under the rear seat,” but that nothing conclusive had been determined at this juncture.

From AN:

U.S. safety regulators will evaluate the cause of the fires as well as the scope, frequency and consequence of the alleged defect.

Most NHTSA investigations start as preliminary evaluations, where agency engineers request information from the manufacturer, including data on complaints, injuries and warranty claims. The manufacturer can also present its view regarding the alleged defect and may issue a recall.

After the evaluation, NHTSA will either close the investigation or move into the next phase. If a safety-related defect exists, according to NHTSA, the agency may send a “recall request” letter to the manufacturer.

A lot of the concerns pertain to the unique dangers of battery fires — something we recently covered following a report from the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) claiming most U.S. fire departments couldn’t handle them. The NTSB has been cracking down on newer automotive technologies in general but has recently focused on electric vehicle fires as manufacturers gear up to dump countless new models into various markets over the next few years.

[Image: Chevrolet]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
8 of 19 comments
  • ToolGuy ToolGuy on Oct 13, 2020

    The following documentary clip rather vividly demonstrates a very typical real-world scenario which results when self-driving technology is combined with internal combustion/liquid fuels. Note: Language advisory (and other unpleasantness). https://tinyurl.com/y33jqxlx

  • Akear Akear on Oct 14, 2020

    It is tragic GM is betting the company on a lost cause like the Bolt.

    • See 5 previous
    • 28-Cars-Later 28-Cars-Later on Oct 15, 2020

      @28-Cars-Later Wild prediction: Tesla will buy GMNA in a multi year transition deal when the parent GM pulls out of North America. This will be for its EV technologies and distribution network. Tesla will sell cheaper crappier EVs under another marque and use the GMNA dealer network to move the volume.

  • CKNSLS Sierra SLT There are small/midsize Chinese made trucks all over South America. Many South American countries are on "favored trade status" with China.
  • Slavuta "The accused companies include Toyota, Nissan, Subaru, Volkswagen, BMW, Mazda, Mercedes-Benz and Kia"May be I am paranoid but all the manufacturers here are from US vassal states occupied by US forces. And I believe, this is not a coincidence.
  • CoastieLenn I am so conflicted and confused on this whole "data industry" complaint. On one hand, I completely understand that what someone does, says, and basically thinks is entirely their own business (unless it impacts or could impact others then that freedom should get murky), but on the other hand I feel like b**ching and moaning about it now while you know you have had a cell phone in your pocket for nearly two decades that have been proven to be collecting that same type of data *even when turned off* dozens of times per hour and then transmitting it as soon as it's turned back on is a giant waste of time and the complaints just seem like attention grabs. I'll also admit that I'm completely carefree to let any LEO search my vehicle or person at any time, for any reason because I know I'll never have a reason to worry about it. In that same vein, there's a high percentage of people that have the opposite viewpoint for the opposite reason and to them I say "there's a simple solution to that problem that you're clearly incapable or unwilling to correct, so you're your own worst enemy".
  • Tassos Ans: ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.I don't want to know anything about any other poor man's BMW Mazda either.
  • Tassos Ford is losing $100,000 for each EV it sells.Socially Promoted, Affirmtive Action hire Mary Barra does not disclose the corresponding number for GM. Maybe it is even worse? It sure is not zero.
Next