Excited Onlookers: Look at the Charge Port on THAT

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Cadillac debuts its electric Lyriq crossover on August 6th, just a few short… well, at least a year or more before it goes into production as either a 2022 or 2023 model.

Hoping to generate Bronco-worthy levels of buzz that won’t materialize, the automaker released a couple of teasers of the upcoming vehicle, revealing a feature that causes this Canadian to tug his collar in an aggressive manner.

The Lyriq, Cadillac’s first all-electric vehicle, is the vanguard of an EV product wave from the brand. Joining this cohort are similar products bound for other GM divisions. Built atop a versatile third-generation platform, with an in-house Ultium battery pack slung underneath, this midsize crossover is one of five Caddy EVs expected to be on the road within the next handful of years.

The brand didn’t do much revealing on Friday, but the sliding front fender panel hiding the model’s charge port is worthy of discussion. Hopefully there’s a modicum of heat generated behind that panel, as yours truly once had to violently kick the driver’s door of a GM product in order to enter it following a flash freeze. Breaking that icy seal left your author’s car with a permanent dent, but it was better than the alternative (grim, frigid death).

But buyers in the high-priced field like fancy things, and a conventional, fuel door-type charge port cover just doesn’t come across as innovative and disruptive. Like power running boards, new things that could fail and cause the owner embarrassment are the premium class’ stock-in-trade.

Joining the Lyriq’s look-at-me charge port are a set of very expressive wheels designed to match the model’s futuristic face — a visage that reportedly carries over nearly unchanged from the concept renderings released early last year.

While GM isn’t shy of the capabilities and power specs of its upcoming GMC Hummer EV pickup, the Lyriq carries many more question marks. The Ultium batteries, at least in the Hummer, are supposedly capable of up to 400 miles of driving between recharges, but it isn’t known just how long-legged this smaller crossover will be.

Tune in on August 6th.

[Images: General Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 25 comments
  • Dukeisduke Dukeisduke on Jul 31, 2020

    When’s the first TSB for this fiasco? I can see a retrofit kit, warranty labor, and dealer body shops trying to paint match the new parts (fender and port cover). Bad idea.

  • JGlanton JGlanton on Aug 01, 2020

    I really dont understand the grocery store premise. Since the pandemic started, all I have done is go to the desert, mountains, and backcountry. What else is there? This week is hiking glaciers Ansel Adams Wilderness. Last week was Joshua Tree to hike and photograph the comet. Before that, Anza Borrego, John Muir Wilderness, offroad geology tour of Mojave Preserve, kayak fishing the Pacific for thresher sharks, mountain biking to breweries... I mean if there was ever a time to go outdoors in a Jeeo, I havent heard of it.

  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
  • GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
  • Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
  • Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.
  • Wjtinfwb Not proud of what Stellantis is rolling out?
Next