U.S. Trade Head to Meet With UAW This Week Over New Trade Deal

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer will be in Michigan this week to meet with union leaders from United Auto Workers in a bit to gain their approval for the Trump administration’s new North American free trade deal. Lighthizer is scheduled to meet with union officials in Dearborn on Tuesday to answer questions about the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) while simultaneously drumming up support.

The USMCA deal suggests increasing existing requirements for North American content for vehicles, stipulating that 40 percent of a vehicle’s overall content be manufactured in areas paying at least $16 an hour, while also encouraging Mexico to tailor its labor rules to allow unions to wield legitimate collective bargaining powers.

According to Reuters, Lighthizer said that the USMCA was “clearly better than” the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) at at a congressional hearing from last week, adding that Congress would have “no credibility at all” with China or “on any deals with your other trading partners” if it didn’t pass.

From Reuters:

Many Democrats argue the agreement needs improvements to ensure that higher labor and environmental standards can be fully enforced before they can support it. The pact has been billed as requiring Mexico to change its labor laws to allow unions with true collective bargaining power a fairer chance to form, a provision aimed at pushing up Mexican wages.

And many Republicans, as well as companies and farm groups, say the administration must agree to drop tariffs on aluminum and steel imports from Canada and Mexico before the agreement can move to a vote.

The American Automotive Policy Council announced it was supportive of USMCA and urged Congress to get the ball rolling on turning it into law on Friday. But the UAW, has been more tentative in its backing. In November, UAW President Gary Jones said the trade proposal didn’t go far enough to discourage companies like General Motors from relocating production to take advantage of lower labor costs in other parts of the world.

“Before the ink hit the paper, General Motors has already signaled that the ‘New’ NAFTA (known as USMCA) is not strong enough, as it stands today, to deter them from moving products and taking advantage of low cost labor,” Jones said. “Quite simply, the ‘New’ NAFTA needs more input and more work. We were hopeful that this new agreement would rein in the corporate greed that has bled manufacturing in the United States. Unfortunately, as GM’s idling of plants in Ohio, Michigan and Maryland this week showed — the ‘New’ NAFTA, as it stands now, is not strong enough to protect American workers.”

The UAW supports provisions to improve working conditions and wages in Mexico, citing violence against strikers and unfair wages for auto workers it believes stems from a “lack of basic rights.” While altruistic on its surface, critics have claimed that the UAW knows doubling the average wages of Mexican auto workers (they currently stand at around $8 an hour) would make it a less tempting option for domestic automakers looking for a place to manufacture new product — giving Canada and the United States a presumed advantage.

However the UAW also has suggestions of its own, likely to be discussed with Lighthizer on Tuesday. Among them is a push to take the proposed $16 minimum wage regarding regional content requirements to $24 an hour for final assembly, engines, transmissions, axles, vehicle frames, battery systems, and R&D — with remaining components and materials being set at $17 an hour.

[Image: General Motors]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 9 comments
  • Luke42 Luke42 on Mar 04, 2019

    Good luck selling the Trump administration's kneejerk policies. I find that what this administration's credibility rarely survives contact with details and/or knowledge of a specific domain. I'm a techie and an armchair economist, and Trump's gang knows far less about either domain than I do. If you learned everything you know from Fox News, Trump makes a lot of sense. As soon as you add in some other information source, such knowing your own industry, there are a lot of "hey, wait a minute!?!!!" moments whener you listen to Trump or any member of his administration speak. The auto workers do live their industry. I'm sure a Trump administration person will say something that seems completely ridiculous to them if they let that guy speak long enough. So, as much disdain as I have for Trump, I can honestly wish them good luck in overcoming this credibility problem -- because they'll need to up their game to sell this, and the Trump administration's really needs to up their game before they bumble in to another trade war, or a nuclear war, or whatever. America needs them to up their game, so that we can make good decisions as a nation. Good luck, guys! America needs you guys to get your stuff together... Please!

  • Roader Roader on Mar 04, 2019

    It's easy to be critical when you're poor: GDP per capita (PPP)(US$) United States 59,495 Germany 50,206 Australia 49,882 Canada 48,141 United Kingdom 43,620 France 43,550

  • Master Baiter I told my wife that rather than buying my 13YO son a car when he turns 16, we'd be better off just having him take Lyft everywhere he needs to go. She laughed off the idea, but between the cost of insurance and an extra vehicle, I'd wager that Lyft would be a cheaper option, and safer for the kid as well.
  • Master Baiter Toyota and Honda have sufficient brand equity and manufacturing expertise that they could switch to producing EVs if and when they determine it's necessary based on market realities. If you know how to build cars, then designing one around an EV drive train is trivial for a company the size of Toyota or Honda. By waiting it out, these companies can take advantage of supply chains being developed around batteries and electric motors, while avoiding short term losses like Ford is experiencing. Regarding hybrids, personally I don't do enough city driving to warrant the expense and complexity of a system essentially designed to recover braking energy.
  • Urlik You missed the point. The Feds haven’t changed child labor laws so it is still illegal under Federal law. No state has changed their law so that it goes against a Federal child labor hazardous order like working in a slaughter house either.
  • Plaincraig 1975 Mercury Cougar with the 460 four barrel. My dad bought it new and removed all the pollution control stuff and did a lot of upgrades to the engine (450hp). I got to use it from 1986 to 1991 when I got my Eclipse GSX. The payments and insurance for a 3000GT were going to be too much. No tickets no accidents so far in my many years and miles.My sister learned on a 76 LTD with the 350 two barrel then a Ford Escort but she has tickets (speeding but she has contacts so they get dismissed or fine and no points) and accidents (none her fault)
  • Namesakeone If I were the parent of a teenage daughter, I would want her in an H1 Hummer. It would be big enough to protect her in a crash, too big for her to afford the fuel (and thus keep her home), big enough to intimidate her in a parallel-parking situation (and thus keep her home), and the transmission tunnel would prevent backseat sex.If I were the parent of a teenage son, I would want him to have, for his first wheeled transportation...a ride-on lawnmower. For obvious reasons.
Next