As Troubles At Home Hit Subaru's Bottom Line, Americans Do Their Duty and Hand the Brand Another Record

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Subaru reported an operating loss in its most recent fiscal quarter, with recalls and regulatory scandals in its home market dragging the company into the red. The company said it lost $22 million in the quarter ending September 30th, a departure from last year’s $816.3 million operating profit. Meanwhile, global volume fell 6 percent.

In the company’s largest market — the United States — it was an entirely different scenario, with American buyers conspiring to give the brand its 83rd consecutive year-over-year sales increase. A record for October, too, but that’s sort of a given. Very nice of those buyers, but the credit really belongs to the Ascent crossover.

Like September, last month saw a year-over-year U.S. sales gain only because of the extra buyers dumped into the brand by the new three-row utility vehicle. The model’s best month so far saw an additional 6,008 vehicles added to Subaru’s sales roster, pushing the brand to a 2.5 percent monthly gain. Year to date, Subaru’s up 4.9 percent — mainly thanks to the Ascent.

Subtracting last year’s October YTD number from last month’s shows Subaru sold an additional 25,919 vehicles over the first 10 months of the year, not that far above the Ascent’s 22,588 figure. The automaker would still be up for the year without the new model, but it would be a very close thing indeed. The only other model in Subaru’s lineup to post a YTD gain is the Crosstrek, now up 39.7 percent.

With that said, the Crosstrek had company in the year-over-year sales gain club. Thanks to a redesigned ( but not too redesigned) Forester, that model posted a 19 percent YoY volume climb. It’s no surprise that the North American region was a money-maker for Subaru. Operating profit rose 4.4 percent last quarter.

Back in Japan, Subaru’s ongoing inspection scandal expanded Monday, with the automaker adding another 100,000 vehicles built as recently as last month to the roster of improperly inspected cars. No exported vehicles were among the group. In order to make good with the public, Subaru must now recall more than half a million vehicles in order to perform a task that should have been completed before the cars left the factory.

Adding to that headache and financial burden is a very expensive recall announced last week. Fragile valve springs in certain models forced the recall of 411,000 vehicles worldwide, and the work won’t be easy. Expect service technicians to spend many hours with each vehicle, and even more if there’s damage to the engine.

[Image: Subaru]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 35 comments
  • Felix Hoenikker Felix Hoenikker on Nov 05, 2018

    We are in the market for a CUV for my wife. She likes to "sit high" after driving a minivan for a long time. The Outback is on my list of possible replacements, but this article only reinforces my hesitation about the Subaru brand. That, and the local dealer is a piece of work. Damn, how hard is it to make a valve spring? The problem reminds me of GMs cost cutting in the 80s that ultimately led to the bankruptcy. Any way, I will be asking for a big discount in order to get over the past history long term reliability issues. That, or a really cheap 3 year lease.

  • Vehic1 Vehic1 on Nov 05, 2018

    Subaru deserves credit for this record - which, at this time, is only about the nearly 7 years of monthly increases. Said increases, however, have long since ceased to reach the magnitude of those around the years 2012-2015; in fact, I wonder if a few of them may have been an "all hands on deck" effort, to wheeze forth the barest increase (urging dealers, perhaps, to trade in a personal vehicle) in order to keep the string/bragging rights alive.

  • Varezhka I have still yet to see a Malibu on the road that didn't have a rental sticker. So yeah, GM probably lost money on every one they sold but kept it to boost their CAFE numbers.I'm personally happy that I no longer have to dread being "upgraded" to a Maxima or a Malibu anymore. And thankfully Altima is also on its way out.
  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
  • GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
  • Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
  • Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.
Next