Musk Claims Tesla's New Autopilot Chip Is Only Six Months Away

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Tesla CEO Elon Musk says a new chip aimed at improving its vehicles’ Autopilot features will be available in about six months.

However, if you’re hoping the automaker is preparing to light some candles and knock its vehicles up with legitimate self-driving technology, you’ll need to keep on wishing. During a string of tweets on Tuesday, Musk explained that the new chip would be a $5,000 extra for customers who did not purchase their cars with the “Full Self-Driving” package — an automotive claim that’s about as valid as Donald Trump’s hair or Elizabeth Warren’s status as a Native American.

It’s difficult to understand why anyone would purchase this item for $5,000 when it’s unclear what it would even do. Musk claims it drastically improves Autopilot’s processing capabilities, boosting the maximum number of operations per second between 500 and 2,000 percent. While incredible, Tesla’s cars are still left with the same array of sensors they’ve always had.

Relying primarily on visual cues via an array of cameras, Tesla’s setup lacks some of the equipment the industry has informally agreed upon as being absolutely necessary. Tesla doesn’t use lidar and, despite Autopilot being one of the more useful and least obtrusive semi-autonomous driving aids, it’s an older system deployed somewhat irresponsibly by the manufacturer.

This new chip won’t change any of that. While we’re sure it’s theoretically possible to make the vehicle’s CPU so powerful that it can make sense of just about anything picked up by cameras, there’s a sense that we aren’t quite there yet. Otherwise, we’d probably have bipedal robots delivering our mail and sweeping our floors before they eventually rise up to destroy us.

Tesla is simultaneous promising something and nothing with this new chip. It’s reminiscent of its last over-the-air update, which included the Version 9.0 software upgrade. Musk said 9.0 effectively improved ops per second by around 400 percent after correcting an Electrek article where a “deep learning expert” over-estimated its performance to a wild degree.

However, that article also explained why something like the chip could be useful. It might not bring about an immediate evolution of the Autopilot that’s currently in your Model S, but it does help to serve the greater good. By increasing processing power on a large number of its vehicles, Tesla should also be able to transmit more useful data into the cloud. While the ins and outs of the company’s machine learning setup are still kind of murky, we know it has something in place that it uses to aid in autonomous development. This could help expedite things, resulting in new functions at a later date.

There’s also a chance it could help Autopilot function a little more smoothly in the interim, assuming its shortcoming are on the processing end of things and not down to the limitations of its sensors. Still, we’re not convinced it’s worth shelling out five grand for something that doesn’t come with any kind of immediate, tangible gratification.

[Image: Tesla]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 23 comments
  • Sckid213 Sckid213 on Oct 17, 2018

    So it can see fire trucks now?

  • WildcatMatt WildcatMatt on Oct 18, 2018

    Matt, are you trying to channel Jack Baruth in your prose style here? That's the vibe I'm getting and pardon me for saying so but it wears like an ill-tailored suit.

  • Jalop1991 Nissan is Readying a Slew of New Products to Boost Sales and ProfitabilitySo they're moving to lawn and garden equipment?
  • Yuda I'd love to see what Hennessy does with this one GAWD
  • Lorenzo I just noticed the 1954 Ford Customline V8 has the same exterior dimensions, but better legroom, shoulder room, hip room, a V8 engine, and a trunk lid. It sold, with Fordomatic, for $21,500, inflation adjusted.
  • Lorenzo They won't be sold just in Beverly Hills - there's a Nieman-Marcus in nearly every big city. When they're finally junked, the transfer case will be first to be salvaged, since it'll be unused.
  • Ltcmgm78 Just what we need to do: add more EVs that require a charging station! We own a Volt. We charge at home. We bought the Volt off-lease. We're retired and can do all our daily errands without burning any gasoline. For us this works, but we no longer have a work commute.
Next