Chevrolet Performance Expanding Crate Options for Project Cars

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Chevrolet is responding to Dodge’s introduction of a Hellcat-based crate engine intended for project cars that absolutely have to produce an obscene amount of horsepower. The “Hellcrate” was introduced last year, making 707 hp, for the low price of $19,530 — which actually sounds kind of expensive when you say it out loud.

Not to be outdone, General Motors is offering a trio of new engines to complement its already full stable. There’s the supercharged 6.2-liter LT5 from the Corvette ZR1, which should trump Dodge’s mill at 755 hp, and two naturally aspirated alternatives that should be sufficient for most applications. The company is also taking them to SEMA, affixed to some vintage Chevy models to stoke consumer interest. Hence the sinister-looking, LT5-equipped 1973 Chevelle Laguna pictured above.

For small-block enthusiasts, Chevrolet Performance is providing a ZZ6 with fuel injection. GM claims that it’s “the best of both worlds” for buyers seeking a classic 350 that don’t want to futz with a carburetor or electronic tuning. It makes 420 horsepower, which is 15 ponies better than the old ZZ6 without EFI. But you can still mount a traditional-looking air cleaner to the top of the new crate engine if you want keep the retro look. GM has placed the motor into a 1967 C/10 for display purposes.

Big-block boys will also be pleased to know that the 6.0-liter L96 will also be available from Chevy Performance with EFI. Rated at 360 horsepower and 380 lb-ft of torque, the behemoth has been crammed inside of a 1978 K10 Silverado for SEMA.

General Motors also said there would be an expanded range of transmissions, including the all-new 6L80-E six-speed automatic designed specifically for LS/LT engine swaps. Like the crate motors, it’ll be in Chevrolet Performances 2019 catalog. Meanwhile, the cars will be on display at Las Vegas Convention Center at the end of the month if you just want to pass judgement on Chevy’s work.

[Images: General Motors]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
8 of 15 comments
  • Ajla Ajla on Oct 17, 2018

    "Big-block boys will also be pleased to know that the 6.0-liter L96 will also be available from Chevy Performance with EFI. Rated at 360 horsepower and 380 lb-ft of torque" I guess GM assumes the "Big-block boys" have never heard of junkyards.

    • See 4 previous
    • Raph Raph on Oct 18, 2018

      @JimZ Meh... some people dig the SBC and BBC engines for looks and nostalgia. I have friend that has a 72 Nova and when a former buddy of his scammed him on a 383 stroker I begged him to pass on the old school small block stuff but he's a diehard. Granted a well built LS would be lost on him since he really doesn't run his car. Its more a show car than anything else.

  • Stingray65 Stingray65 on Oct 18, 2018

    I'm waiting for the Bolt crate drivetrain that I can put into a Chevette or Vega.

    • HotPotato HotPotato on Oct 24, 2018

      Always liked the look of the Vega. I'd drive that. Or better yet, a Bolt-powered Corvair. But the Shoveit needs to stay in the graveyard.

  • Varezhka I have still yet to see a Malibu on the road that didn't have a rental sticker. So yeah, GM probably lost money on every one they sold but kept it to boost their CAFE numbers.I'm personally happy that I no longer have to dread being "upgraded" to a Maxima or a Malibu anymore. And thankfully Altima is also on its way out.
  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
  • GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
  • Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
  • Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.
Next