At What Point Do We Want Our Cars to Be Less Like Our Phones?

by Steph Willems

Published: August 2nd, 2018

at what point do we want our cars to be em less em like our phones

That’s one of the unspoken questions contained in Automotive News‘ report on automotive supplier Continental’s new biometric authentication technology. Passwords are the scourge of the modern age, it’s true, and having a secure way of locking and unlocking a sensitive…anything…is preferable to trying to remember that damn combination of letters and numbers.

Computer files. Your phone. The entrance to sterile, high-security office buildings. These are all good candidates for facial recognition technology, fingerprint and retina scans, or voice recognition. But your car? It’s true that using this technology — in addition to conventional keys and fobs — would add an extra layer of defence, improving your vehicle’s chances of remaining unmolested. But at what cost?

Much like Elon Musk’s brilliant idea to “conveniently” centralize all minor vehicle functions in a central infotainment interface (which compelled owners to take their eyes off the road to dick around with menus just to roll down windows and adjust dash vents), technology doesn’t always make our lives easier.

Adding extra steps rarely makes things easier. It also adds an extra layer of uncertainty, as a door with two locks now has an extra lock that could break.

But Continental really wants to market its technology to the auto industry, going as far as engaging execs and journos at this week’s CAR Management Briefing Seminars in Traverse City, Michigan. The company’s tech would allow vehicle owners to unlock and start their car with any combination of voice command, face, or fingerprint recognition. It’s not a new concept, of course. Ford, for example, just patented a system for voice-activated seats. And it’s a logical path to go from, say, a keypad to a thumb scanner.

In a vehicle outfitted with facial recognition, for example, a camera located in the side-view mirror would scan the owner’s face before allowing them to unlock the door. Inside, an infrared camera would peer through the darkness for facial match before allowing the ignition to do its stuff.

If you’re the type who constantly worries about your car turning up missing from its parking spot (or your teen getting their hands on your keys), this might be just the ticket. Who are we to say there shouldn’t be choice in all things?

Besides just stealing keys and fobs, crafty thieves have been known to “steal” a fob’s unlocking signal to pilfer cars. So, with two out of the three biometric security measures, stealing the key or fob (or signal) would prove worthless. The third measure would require the thief to remove at least one of your fingers before making off with the car.

Not all thieves are willing to go that far in pursuit of a vehicle. Still, there’s many scenarios where we could see such a security system falling victim to weather, software gremlins, etc, rendering the car — and your fob — useless, at least until you’ve gone through other channels to gain access. Where and when that might happen could prove inconvenient — even dangerous.

Depending on your view of the modern world, your take might be more or less cynical than this author’s.

#Biometrics #Continental #Security #Technology #Unlocking

Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 40 comments

Turf3 on Aug 06, 2018

Just to reiterate: As far as I am concerned, all other entry and starting methods for automobiles are INFERIOR to a mechanical key. Ideally it would not even have a chip embedded in it, just a purely mechanical lock. Use some of the money saved from these unreliable gadget doohickeys, to upgrade the lock from the el cheapo disc tumbler locks to a proper pin tumbler lock, and then leave me the heck alone.

Like Reply
PandaBear on Aug 06, 2018

I don't mind it as long as I don't have to pay for it.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Pau65792686 I think there is a need for more sedans. Some people would rather drive a car over SUV’s or CUV’s. If Honda and Toyota can do it why not American brands. We need more affordable sedans.
Tassos Obsolete relic is NOT a used car.It might have attracted some buyers in ITS DAY, 1985, 40 years ago, but NOT today, unless you are a damned fool.
Stan Reither Jr. Part throttle efficiency was mentioned earlier in a postThis type of reciprocating engine opens the door to achieve(slightly) variable stroke which would provide variable mechanical compression ratio adjustments for high vacuum (light load) or boost(power) conditions IMO
Joe65688619 Keep in mind some of these suppliers are not just supplying parts, but assembled components (easy example is transmissions). But there are far more, and the more they are electronically connected and integrated with rest of the platform the more complex to design, engineer, and manufacture. Most contract manufacturers don't make a lot of money in the design and engineering space because their customers to that. Commodity components can be sourced anywhere, but there are only a handful of contract manufacturers (usually diversified companies that build all kinds of stuff for other brands) can engineer and build the more complex components, especially with electronics. Every single new car I've purchased in the last few years has had some sort of electronic component issue: Infinti (battery drain caused by software bug and poorly grounded wires), Acura (radio hiss, pops, burps, dash and infotainment screens occasionally throw errors and the ignition must be killed to reboot them, voice nav, whether using the car's system or CarPlay can't seem to make up its mind as to which speakers to use and how loud, even using the same app on the same trip - I almost jumped in my seat once), GMC drivetrain EMF causing a whine in the speakers that even when "off" that phased with engine RPM), Nissan (didn't have issues until 120K miles, but occassionally blew fuses for interior components - likely not a manufacturing defect other than a short developed somewhere, but on a high-mileage car that was mechanically sound was too expensive to fix (a lot of trial and error and tracing connections = labor costs). What I suspect will happen is that only the largest commodity suppliers that can really leverage their supply chain will remain, and for the more complex components (think bumper assemblies or the electronics for them supporting all kinds of sensors) will likley consolidate to a handful of manufacturers who may eventually specialize in what they produce. This is part of the reason why seemingly minor crashes cost so much - an auto brand does nst have the parts on hand to replace an integrated sensor , nor the expertice as they never built them, but bought them). And their suppliers, in attempt to cut costs, build them in way that is cheap to manufacture (not necessarily poorly bulit) but difficult to replace without swapping entire assemblies or units).I've love to see an article on repair costs and how those are impacting insurance rates. You almost need gap insurance now because of how quickly cars depreciate yet remain expensive to fix (orders more to originally build, in some cases). No way I would buy a CyberTruck - don't want one, but if I did, this would stop me. And it's not just EVs.
Joe65688619 I agree there should be more sedans, but recognize the trend. There's still a market for performance oriented-drivers. IMHO a low budget sedan will always be outsold by a low budget SUV. But a sports sedan, or a well executed mid-level sedan (the Accord and Camry) work. Smaller market for large sedans except I think for an older population. What I'm hoping to see is some consolidation across brands - the TLX for example is not selling well, but if it was offered only in the up-level configurations it would not be competing with it's Honda sibling. I know that makes the market smaller and niche, but that was the original purpose of the "luxury" brands - badge-engineering an existing platform at a relatively lower cost than a different car and sell it with a higher margin for buyers willing and able to pay for them. Also creates some "brand cachet." But smart buyers know that simple badging and slightly better interiors are usually not worth the cost. Put the innovative tech in the higher-end brands first, differentiate they drivetrain so it's "better" (the RDX sells well for Acura, same motor and tranmission, added turbo which makes a notable difference compared to the CRV). The sedan in many Western European countries is the "family car" as opposed to micro and compact crossovers (which still sell big, but can usually seat no more than a compact sedan).