Amid a Flurry of Model Changes, Land Rover's 'Road Rover' Is No Sure Thing

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Jaguar Land Rover’s mysterious Road Rover name, now trademarked, has been the subject of speculation ever since the British automaker began tossing it around in internal communications. As the company prepares a slew of new or redesigned models based largely around a versatile new architecture, the name has cropped up again.

It seems “Road Rover” won’t appear on the flanks of the mystery vehicle, even if it is built.

Actually, the nature of the vehicle isn’t quite a mystery. According to Autocar, which just published a rundown of Jaguar Land Rover’s near-term product plans, JLR wants its Modular Longitudinal Architecture — aka the MLA platform — to underpin all of its vehicles. The platform, due out in 2020, supports a wide variety of propulsion sources, including mild-hybrid gas and diesel powertrains, plug-in hybrids, and pure EVs, for rear- or all-wheel drive applications.

It’s the greenest of the three powertrain JLR wants for the Road Rover, which Autocar describes as a Range Rover “Allroad” EV. The Road Rover name will not find its way to the vehicle, the publication states, and the vehicle itself seems built on shaky planning ground. A weak economy or a collapse of the estate car market could erase the model’s future, it claims.

This seems to confirm that JLR envisions the Road Rover an all-electric, road-focused station wagon with enough off-road prowess baked in to satisfy the company’s heritage.

It’s a big, pricey plan JLR’s working with. By 2024, every model in the automaker’s stable will see a top-down redesign, with a few new editions. This include a larger, ultra-lux Jaguar J-Pace SUV to take on Porsche’s Cayenne, a new Land Rover Defender, and the aforementioned Road Rover project. Each of these vehicle will gain the MLA platform, said to be lighter than JLR’s current aluminum architecture. The all-electric Jaguar XJ gains it, too.

With MLA, plug-in hybrid models will see an electric motor handle rear-wheel propulsion in AWD models.

Going by JLR’s timeline, the first revamped product is the second-generation Range Rover Evoque, which gains a plug-in hybrid version. While the MLA platform looms in its future, the Evoque 2 sees its current steel platform revamped and renamed as JLR’s Premium Transverse Architecture (PTA). It’s the same platform underpinning the next-gen Land Rover Discovery Sport and Jaguar E-Pace.

The automaker wants its smallest and most affordable models to one day adopt the fancy new MLA underpinnings, but, like the Road Rover, this plan isn’t set in stone. For one, the models would have to grow in size to accommodate the platform. That’s not great for affordability. However, to keep the models similar to their current form, JLR would have to develop a new platform — heaping additional development costs onto the automaker.

At least there’ll be time to make a decision. JLR didn’t plan on releasing the aluminum platform small utes until 2025.

[Image: Jaguar Land Rover]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 14 comments
  • DenverMike DenverMike on Aug 06, 2018

    Drive Thru Rover

  • Tstag Tstag on Aug 07, 2018

    According to some reports I’ve read was Rover will relaunch in China as an electric car brand targeting Tesla Model 3 owners. Will be interesting to see if that’s true but I note Tata is also working on such a car so there might be a thought that an electric car would sell in China better as a Rover than a Tata....

  • Lorenzo This car would have sold better if there was a kit to put fiberglass toast slices on the roof.
  • Lorenzo The Malibu is close to what the 1955 Bel Air was, but 6 inches shorter in height, and 3 inches shorter in wheelbase, the former making it much more difficult to get into or out of. Grandma has to sit in front (groan) and she'll still have trouble getting in and out.The '55s had long options lists, but didn't include a 91 cubic inch four with a turbo, or a continuously variable transmission. Metal and decent fabric were replaced by cheap plastic too. The 1955 price was $1765 base, or $20,600 adjusted for inflation, but could be optioned up to $3,000 +/-, or $36,000, so in the same ballpark.The fuel economy, handling, and reliability are improved, but that's about it. Other than the fact that it means one fewer sedan available, there's no reason to be sorry it's being discontinued. Put the 1955 body on it and it'll sell like hotcakes, though.
  • Calrson Fan We are already seeing multiple manufacturers steering away from EVs to Hybrids & PHEVs. Suspect the market will follow. Battery tech isn't anywhere close to where it needs to be for EV's to replace ICE's. Neither is the electrical grid or charging infrastructure. PHEV's still have the drawback that if you can't charge at home your not a potential customer. I've heard stories of people with Volts that never charge them but that's a unique kind of stupidity. If you can't or don't want to charge your PHEV then just get a hybrid.
  • AZFelix The last time I missed the Malibu was when one swerved into my lane and I had to brake hard to avoid a collision. 1 out of 5⭐️. Do not recommend.
  • 2ACL I won't miss it; it was decent at launch, but in addition to the bad packaging, GM did little to keep it relevant in the segment. I'd prefer that another domestic automaker doesn't just give up on the mainstream sedan, but unlike some of Ford's swan songs, the Malibu made an indifferent case for why they should live.
Next