Ford Taurus to Follow Fiesta Out the Door: Report

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

It’s a bad news day if you’re a lover of traditional passenger cars, but surely you’ve grown used to this thing by now. As automakers, especially domestic ones, cast a critical eye on their lineups, many models without rear liftgates will inevitably fall victim to the quest for greater profit.

We brought you a report of the Chevrolet Sonic’s impending demise earlier today, but now it’s time to turn from GM to Ford. The same report, drawing on sources with knowledge of the company’s product plans, says the storied Taurus nameplate is not long for this world. Imagine dropping this bombshell on someone in the late 1980s.

Nowadays, you’d likely be greeted with, “They still make the Taurus?”

The Wall Street Journal cites sources claiming Fiesta production will cease for American consumers this year. That’s no shock, as this continent didn’t get the next-generation Fiesta that debuted in Europe in late 2016. The Fiesta was a dead subcompact walking. Erm, driving. A Ford exec admitted as much in Romania last summer, though the U.S. eventually saw a carryover 2018 model.

These same sources claim Ford has decided to discontinue the Taurus, but did not provide a timeline for its departure. If confirmed, this means the current, aging generation will be the model’s last. It also means the end of the Ford Police Interceptor Sedan — a variant that’s quickly being replaced by the Explorer-based Interceptor Utility.

Built at Ford’s troubled Chicago Assembly plant, today’s Taurus is better known to fleet customers than retail buyers. It wasn’t always that way. In the decade following its 1986 model year introduction, the Taurus was a domestic sales juggernaut, providing the likes of the Honda Accord and Toyota Camry with real competition. When its spaceship styling gave way to the ovoid monstrosity of 1996, sales began a slow, sad descent. Still, U.S. sales crested the 300,000 mark in 2005 (much of that being fleet buys).

The Taurus withered on the vine, ceasing production in 2006. Newly minted Ford CEO Alan Mulally couldn’t stomach it, however, and resurrected the model nameplate soon after, affixing it to the former full-size Five Hundred.

The sixth-generation Taurus bowed for the 2010 model year, with a refresh arriving for 2013. Since reaching a current-generation U.S. sales high of 74,375 units in 2013, Taurus popularity waned to 41,236 sales last year. In March, civilian Taurus sales fell 36.3 percent, year over year. Over the first three months of 2018, Taurus volume fell 29.5 percent.

Crushed by this report? The news isn’t all bad — the same WSJ sources claim Ford hasn’t yet reached a decision on what to do with the endangered Fusion, which sees the most minor of refreshes for the 2019 model year. A reprieve is possible.

[Images: Ford Motor Company]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 157 comments
  • Ponchoman49 Ponchoman49 on Apr 05, 2018

    Just sad. It is getting hard to be a car guy as the years go by and cool vehicles keep being eliminated for boring egg shaped tall wagons called SUV's. Thank god for the older stuff.

  • Akear Akear on Apr 07, 2018

    IF Ford is going to cancel its cars at least do a good job producing SUVs. The Escape recently scored last in a government crash test.

  • Blueice How much is the industry saving by removing AM from radios??Perhaps it is a new government unit credit inducement. Have you seen all of those screws holding the rear plate, whichare in the State of Rust? The cost saving was .66 cents per unit,which all went to executive board.
  • Varezhka Dunno, I have a feeling the automakers will just have the cars do that without asking and collect that money for themselves. Just include a small print in your purchasing contract.I mean, if Elon Musk thinks he can just use all the Teslas out there for his grid computing projects for free, I wouldn't be too surprised if he's already doing this.
  • Varezhka Any plans yet for Stellantis to wind down some of their dozen plus brands? I mean, most of their European brands (except Fiat and Maserati) are not only 80~90% European sales but also becoming old GM level badge jobs of each other. Lots of almost identical cars fighting within the same small continent. Shouldn't they at least go the Opel/Vauxhall route of one country, one brand to avoid cannibalization? The American brands, at least, have already consolidated with Dodge/Chrysler/Jeep/RAM essentially operating like a single brand. An Auto Union of a sort.
  • Namesakeone I read somewhere that Mazda, before the Volkswagen diesel scandal and despite presumably tearing apart and examining several Golfs and Jettas, couldn't figure out how VW did it and decided then not to offer a diesel. Later, when Dieselgate surfaced, it was hinted that Mazda did discover what Volkswagen was doing and kept quiet about it. Maybe Mazda realizes that they don't have the resources of Toyota and cannot do it as well, so they will concentrate on what they do well. Maybe Mazda will decide that they can do well with the RWD midsized sedan with the inline six they were considering a few years ago
  • IH_Fever A little math: An average, not super high end EV (like a model 3) has 70 kwh of storage assuming perfect fully charged conditions. An average 2-3 person home uses roughly 30 kwh per day. So in theory you have a little over 2 days of juice. Real world, less than that. This could be great if your normal outage is short and you're already spending $50k on a car. I'll stick with my $500 generator and $200 in gas that just got me through a week of no power. A/c, fridge, tv, lights, we were living large. :)
Next