2019 Jeep Cherokee First Drive - Refreshed Looks in Search of a Power Boost

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey

Jeep loves to brag about how capable its SUVs are off-road, and the brand can back it up. But considering that most folks who purchase SUVs use them only on-road, does rock-crawling ability outweigh on-road performance?

For most buyers, I suspect the answer is no. That could be a bit of a problem for the refreshed 2019 Jeep Cherokee.

Full disclosure: Jeep paid for my hotel room in Southern California (no flight, as I was already in the area) and several meals, while also providing notebooks and pens. I think they also offered a hat, which I did not take.

New looks, updated interior, and a new available engine choice mark the major changes coming to the midsize SUV for 2019.

Jeep has added a direct-injection 2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder that makes 270 horsepower to the engine lineup. This mill offers start/stop and is the torquiest engine on offer in the Cherokee, with 295 lb-ft. Your other choices are a 2.4-liter four-cylinder making 180 horsepower and 170 lb-ft of torque and a 3.2-liter V6 that churns out 271 horsepower and 239 lb-ft. All mate to a nine-speed automatic transmission.

Jeep chose a mountainous drive loop that will be familiar to anyone who’s ever YouTubed the happenings on the canyon roads near Malibu – a loop that included the infamous “Snake” corner (home to many crashes that are later mocked online). A fine loop for a Fiat 124, perhaps, but perhaps not so much for the Cherokee. I started my day in a base-trim model, and the 2.4 and the nine-speed were no match for the mountains. The transmission was slow to kick down and the engine just wasn’t torquey enough for the hills.

The turbo improves the proceedings to an extent, but it’s still hampered by the nine-speed and its hesitant downshifts. I’d stomp the gas mid-corner to get momentum for exit and it would take a one-count before the power got to ground.

To be fair, few Cherokee drivers are ever going to run up and down Stunt Road or Latigo Canyon during their off hours. Around town, both engines are fine, unremarkable even, although the turbo would be preferred for freeway passes. The nine-speed is better when one is doing the stoplight shuffle than it is in the hills.

My time in the V6 consisted mostly of freeway and around-town driving, and it seemed well-suited to that kind of duty.

Handling in the twisties was about what one would expect from an SUV with off-road chops – which is to say, not the best in class. Understeer is prevalent, and the Cherokee is more chore than joy on those types of roads. Again, most Cherokee buyers won’t come anywhere close to pushing their rigs hard on roads like these, so my beef with its on-road handling prowess may not matter.

As is typical with Jeep events, we spent some time off-road. All Cherokees used on the course were off-road-trimmed Trailhawks. The course was less challenging that what Jeep set up for the Wrangler launch a couple months back, but nothing to sneeze at, and as expected, the Trailhawks handled it easily. Credit goes to all of today’s modern electronic off-road assist goodies, such as hill-ascent, hill-descent control, and Jeep’s five-mode (auto, snow, rock, sport, sand/mud) Selec-Terrain system.

The Trailhawk is also lifted an inch over its stablemates and offers off-road-friendly approach and departure angles along with different front and rear fascias, a locking rear diff, and skid plates.

All Cherokees, save the Trailhawk, are available in 4×2 or 4×4 (Trailhawk is 4×4 only).

Jeep is offering the Cherokee in five trims: Latitude, Latitude Plus, Limited, Overland, and Trailhawk.

The refresh focuses mainly on the front – the hood and front fascia are all new, along with LED headlamps, daytime running lamps, and fog lamps. A hands-free power liftgate is now available.

Interior updates include more cargo volume, new accents, and new available color packages, one of which is “inspired” by Iceland. Available features include UConnect infotainment, heated and cooled front seats, heated steering wheel, Android Auto, Apple CarPlay, satellite radio, USB, and navigation.

Like most Chrysler interiors, it’s user-friendly, with materials that don’t necessarily feel upscale but do feel within the ballpark of class-appropriate. Our testers were pre-production vehicles, so I can’t yet accurately comment on the quality of fit and finish.

The bigger news is the updated exterior, and the look is toned down compared to the extended snout that protruded from the previous model. Toned down, but not drastically different – it’s still instantly recognizable as the Cherokee. It’s a cleaner, less controversial look that remains distinctive. The changes are more noticeable in person, as opposed to photographs.

Evaluating the whole package, you come away with a mid-size SUV that’s capable in the sticks (more so than on the curvy backroads) and works just fine for around-town duties.

You don’t, however, necessarily come away without a dent in the wallet. Depending on your chosen trim and options, that is.

The Cherokee starts at $23,995 for a 4×2 Latitude. Reasonable. A Latitude Plus with 4×4 is a not-too-bad $27,995. But a Trailhawk sets you back $33,320 and a 4×4 Overland checks in at $37,775. All of those prices exclude a $1,195 destination charge.

Options not already mentioned include leather seats, blind-spot monitoring, rear cross-path detection, forward-collision warning, park assist, lane-departure warning, adaptive cruise control, a towing package, and dual-pane sunroof.

Jeep has improved on the Cherokee’s styling, inside and out, while giving buyers one more engine choice. The new turbo is a welcome addition to the lineup. Unfortunately, the Cherokee soldiers forth with one of the more frustrating automatic transmissions on the market. It’s also not particularly engaging when driven hard on-road, in part because it’s so good off-road.

For grocery getting, errand-running, and kid-shuttling, the Cherokee is as good as any choice in this class, but it won’t scratch your enthusiast itch unless you like to bang off boulders. Not to mention that the sticker price goes from “hmm, that’s a value” to “wait, what?” a bit quickly.

“Use case” is a business world term that applies here. How do you plan to drive your next midsize SUV? Your answer will go a long way towards deciding whether the Cherokee fits your bill.

[Images: 2018 © Tim Healey/TTAC]

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 38 comments
  • Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.
  • Wjtinfwb Not proud of what Stellantis is rolling out?
  • Wjtinfwb Absolutely. But not incredibly high-tech, AWD, mega performance sedans with amazing styling and outrageous price tags. GM needs a new Impala and LeSabre. 6 passenger, comfortable, conservative, dead nuts reliable and inexpensive enough for a family guy making 70k a year or less to be able to afford. Ford should bring back the Fusion, modernized, maybe a bit bigger and give us that Hybrid option again. An updated Taurus, harkening back to the Gen 1 and updated version that easily hold 6, offer a huge trunk, elevated handling and ride and modest power that offers great fuel economy. Like the GM have a version that a working mom can afford. The last decade car makers have focused on building cars that American's want, but eliminated what they need. When a Ford Escape of Chevy Blazer can be optioned up to 50k, you've lost the plot.
  • Willie If both nations were actually free market economies I would be totally opposed. The US is closer to being one, but China does a lot to prop up the sectors they want to dominate allowing them to sell WAY below cost, functionally dumping their goods in our market to destroy competition. I have seen this in my area recently with shrimp farmed by Chinese comglomerates being sold super cheap to push local producers (who have to live at US prices and obey US laws) out of business.China also has VERY lax safety and environmental laws which reduce costs greatly. It isn't an equal playing field, they don't play fair.
  • Willie ~300,000 Camrys and ~200,000 Accords say there is still a market. My wife has a Camry and we have no desire for a payment on something that has worse fuel economy.
Next