Audi's Sick of Making Look-alike Cars; Design Chief Wants an 8 Series Rival

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

You’re driving down the freeway on a cloudy day when German sheetmetal catches your eye. New Audi, by the looks of it. Well, it could be new. Yeah, that’s a nice A6 up there. Or is it an A4? Hold on a second, it wasn’t as far away as you thought — that’s the new A3, which borrowed its its older siblings’ clothes.

Suffice it to say, and Ingolstadt isn’t alone in this, that design DNA runs very deep in the Audi family. To see an Audi is to recognize an Audi, but not necessarily to discern what particular Audi you’re seeing. Well, the company wants to change that.

As it begins to feel more comfortable in its own skin, Audi is moving on from a strategy crafted to boost brand recognition. Future models will be more distinctive and less easily mistaken for other models in the lineup, the company’s boss says.

Speaking to Britain’s Autocar, CEO Rupert Stadler explained, “This [repetition] design process was used to make Audis more recognisable in newer and emerging markets. Now we are well known in major markets like China, we can begin to change this philosophy and give each car its own look.”

The first departure from the brand’s past philosophy is the 2018 Audi Q2, a subcompact crossover built on Volkswagen’s MQB platform that doesn’t simply take the Q3/Q5 look and shrink it. A little more upright and angular than other models, the Q2 doesn’t exactly break the styling mold, but it does bend it. Alas, the Q2 is not bound for U.S. shores.

Audi design chief Marc Lichte, whose job it is to literally sculpt the brand’s future, agrees with Stadler.

“We recognise that there is a place for more differentiation now,” he said. “Since our cars are in production for a minimum of six years, in today’s world I think each model should have its own design to be attractive for this long time.”

In the coming years, compact, electrified powertrains should help designers go further afield in terms of shape. With that type of vehicle, “proportions can change,” Lichte said.

Meanwhile, Lichte has his eye on BMW’s upcoming 8 Series ultra-lux coupe. Not wanting Audi to be the only member of the Big Luxurious German Three without a car in this class, the design head would like to build a competitor. He admits, thought, that anticipated demand doesn’t make the idea a top concern. Not when there’s new higher-volume vehicles in the pipeline to worry about.

“I love the shape of a two-door coupé, but it is also true that the [sales] volumes [for them] are much lower than for four-doors,” he told Autocar. “In the future, who knows? We have many ideas in this direction.”

[Images: Audi AG]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 21 comments
  • Heino Heino on Jan 04, 2018

    The same for motorcycles. No matter what country (save for HD), every naked sportbike has the same Quasimodo look of being hunchbacked and holding your headlight in your hands. You can get overpriced retro air-cooled bikes on the low end or get a retro looking expensive large bike. Everything thing else in between looks the same, yes including you BMW and KTM. Designers are an incestuous breed.

  • Lorenzo Lorenzo on Jan 04, 2018

    Funny, my next door neighbor finally gave up on his 1998 A4 Avant - and bought an A3 wagon just like it. The changes are minor, mostly in the front and rear ends, and the higher beltline, but it's basically the same car, with the same dimensions. He traded in a troublesome 2.8 V6 to get a turbo 2.0 I4, but gets more horsepower and better fuel economy. As far as looks are concerned, he just shrugged, and the guy is in his late 30s. He doesn't care, and even chose the same shade of blue. Scott25 is onto something.

  • Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.
  • Wjtinfwb Not proud of what Stellantis is rolling out?
  • Wjtinfwb Absolutely. But not incredibly high-tech, AWD, mega performance sedans with amazing styling and outrageous price tags. GM needs a new Impala and LeSabre. 6 passenger, comfortable, conservative, dead nuts reliable and inexpensive enough for a family guy making 70k a year or less to be able to afford. Ford should bring back the Fusion, modernized, maybe a bit bigger and give us that Hybrid option again. An updated Taurus, harkening back to the Gen 1 and updated version that easily hold 6, offer a huge trunk, elevated handling and ride and modest power that offers great fuel economy. Like the GM have a version that a working mom can afford. The last decade car makers have focused on building cars that American's want, but eliminated what they need. When a Ford Escape of Chevy Blazer can be optioned up to 50k, you've lost the plot.
  • Willie If both nations were actually free market economies I would be totally opposed. The US is closer to being one, but China does a lot to prop up the sectors they want to dominate allowing them to sell WAY below cost, functionally dumping their goods in our market to destroy competition. I have seen this in my area recently with shrimp farmed by Chinese comglomerates being sold super cheap to push local producers (who have to live at US prices and obey US laws) out of business.China also has VERY lax safety and environmental laws which reduce costs greatly. It isn't an equal playing field, they don't play fair.
  • Willie ~300,000 Camrys and ~200,000 Accords say there is still a market. My wife has a Camry and we have no desire for a payment on something that has worse fuel economy.
Next