GM, Ford Cooperating As Federal Investigators Look Into Possible UAW Corruption

by Matt Posky

Published: November 3rd, 2017

gm ford cooperating as federal investigators look into possible uaw corruption

A federal investigation that started with corruption charges against a former Fiat Chrysler labor executive and the wife of a deceased United Auto Workers vice president has expanded to include training centers created by both General Motors and Ford. Investigators issued subpoenas in recent weeks to amass information on the centers, which are jointly operated between the automakers and the UAW.

In the FCA case, company and union officials are alleged to have misappropriated an estimated $4.5 million earmarked for employee training. That money is believed to have gone into personal accounts and used to buy suspiciously extravagant items. The FBI appears to be concerned that similar activities could be happening at Ford and GM-backed training sites.

While the federal probe into Ford is less than clear, The Detroit News reports that authorities are “interested” in Joe Ashton, a retired UAW vice president who was eventually appointed to GM’s board, and Cindy Estrada, his successor in charge of the union’s GM department since 2014.

Ford has stated it is cooperating with the investigation and seems unconcerned that something might be wrong at its training center. When the union corruption charges emerged against FCA employees over the summer, Ford said it had no intention of reviewing the finances of the UAW-Ford National Programs Center. It reiterated that statement this week, saying it has confidence in the site’s current leadership.

General Motors has also said it will be working with authorities, simultaneously launching an internal investigation of is own, while the FBI and UAW have yet to make public statements on the matter. The automaker also suspended Alphons Iacobelli, the former FCA employee involved in the original corruption investigation, in August.

Officials believe that Iacobelli was at the center of a plot where, from 2009 through 2014, he pocketed $1 million and helped syphon $1.2 million from the UAW-Chrysler center to former UAW Vice President General Holiefield, who has since died.

Iacobelli and Holiefield, who led contract negotiations between the manufacturer and the union in 2011, and others used a charity, multiple businesses (including fake hospices), and credit cards to hide the money provided by FCA to the training center and use it personal purchases. That money was allegedly used to pay for a mortgage, numerous vacations, camera equipment, a $350,000 Ferrari 458 Spider, two Montblanc pens costing $37,500 apiece, and more.

#AlphonsIacobelli #AutomotiveIndustry #Fca #FederalInvestigation #FordMotorCo #GeneralMotors #HotLegalAction #Scandals #Uaw #UnionCorruption #UnionNews

Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments

Join the conversation

3 of 11 comments

Civicjohn on Nov 03, 2017

Man, they better get into TSLA fast!

Like Reply
Conundrum on Nov 03, 2017

I love to see how people manage to extend the behavior of a crooked FCA executive and an equally crooked UAW official to blanket condemnation of unions. I'd say oligarch propaganda has become ingrained in the general populace. Grunt, grunt, unions bad, working in an Amazon warehouse for $12 an hour, now, baby, that's freedom!

Like Reply
- Mikey on Nov 04, 2017
  
  @conundrum... Right ! "Investigators issued subpoenas in recent weeks to amass information on the centres , which are jointly operated between the automakers and the UAW" I too am shocked . Who knew high level white collar folks would ever skim off the top ? In my years at the plant we heard many nasty rumours. It wasn't uncommon to hear, or witness, mid -level white collar guys being escorted out the door...Something about "kick backs" from suppliers ???
  
  Like

Recent Comments

Varezhka I have still yet to see a Malibu on the road that didn't have a rental sticker. So yeah, GM probably lost money on every one they sold but kept it to boost their CAFE numbers.I'm personally happy that I no longer have to dread being "upgraded" to a Maxima or a Malibu anymore. And thankfully Altima is also on its way out.
Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.