Ace of Base: 2018 Honda Ridgeline RT 2WD

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

Most readers are well aware of my infatuation with trucks. Blame my rural upbringing, or chalk it up to the innate Canadian friendliness of helping everyone move house, but a pickup truck will always reside in my driveway.

The Honda Ridgeline, newly designed for the 2017 model year, is available in a range of trims, starting with the RT at $29,630. This author was unsure about the Ridgeline’s practicality as a truck when it was introduced, given its lineage. Can a base Honda pickup pass the Ace of Base test?


I have been known to look unfairly upon the Honda Ridgeline, with its unibody construction and decidedly un-muscular roots, with approximately the same amount of distain one would hold for a soiled copy of the National Inquirer. A transverse V6 and a front-drive chassis did not a truck make, I thought.

This was the wrong approach, as most Ridgeline customers care not one whit about such trivialities and are drawn in by the “H” on the grille after a lifetime of Accord or CR-V ownership. Chiseled looks and the ability to stand out in the school drop-off queue are the killer apps for many. The bed in the back is just a bonus. It is hard to find fault with their line of logic.

Under the hood is a 280 horsepower, direct-injected, 3.5-liter V6 that’s the same across the board, no matter the level of trim. Two-wheel-drive Ridgelines, like our base RT, deploy a high-capacity radiator in a bid to boast a 3,500-pound towing capacity. This is about the same as most crossovers and more than enough to haul a utility trailer filled with yard detritus or even tow a small hard-sided camper.

You can smack well over 1000 lbs in the bed, or haul 3,500 lbs worth of gear. My biggest gripe with the Ridgeline is the location of its spare wheel; housed in the in-bed trunk. I challenge anyone who is exercising that payload capacity with a load of gravel to access the hatch containing the spare. Same thing when the bed is full of snow and ice, as it is five months of the year in these climes.

However, as someone was quite correct to point out on the last occasion I groused about this particular design decision, most Ridgeline owners, finding themselves riding on only three inflated tires, will simply call roadside assistance. This is a good point, although this does not help folks who find themselves in possession of an out-of-warranty Honda pickup. Trucks are generally kept working on the road long after their passenger car brethren have been unceremoniously fed into The Crusher, after all.

I do understand why someone would buy a Ridgeline, but only as a quirky alternative to the Pilot and not as a serious truck. That market does exist, though it is shrinking: sales have been hovering around the 2,700 units/month mark since June, down from over 4,000 last December.

However, mine is not to reason why; mine is to give it an Ace of Base try. The base RT trim, offering only two dour colors and bereft of a meaningful infotainment system, is a tough sell. Economies of scale ensure features like cruise control, power windows, and air conditioning are present, as is a truckish Class III trailer hitch and seven-pin electrical connector.

I’d want to make the walk to up at least the RTL-T trim and enjoy all its amenities for $36,080. The most F-150 one can get for that price is a 3.3-liter-equipped 4×2 XL Crew Cab with the Chrome Appearance package and Group 101A. It won’t be nearly as laden with features, but it will tow 5,000 lbs.

Not that anyone is cross-shopping those two machines, of course. An XL-trim Ford truck won’t impress in the drop-off lane nearly as much as a high-spec Ridgeline.

[Image: Honda]

Not every base model has aced it. The ones which have? They help make the automotive landscape a lot better. Any others you can think of, B&B? Let us know in the comments. Naturally, feel free to eviscerate our selection.

The model above is shown in American dollars with American options and trim, absent of destination charges and available rebates. As always, your dealer may sell for less.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 79 comments
  • Ajla Ajla on Nov 15, 2017

    If I buy a truck it better treat the roads like Sasha Grey and make me feel like I have an 11 inch wang.

  • Gltff Gltff on Nov 16, 2017

    I own a 2017 RTL-T Ridgeline and it's the perfect truck for me. We are dedicated DIY landscapers and the Ridgeline is just fine for hauling dirt, gravel, mulch, pine straw, lumber, etc. I sold my 2008 Tacoma when I purchased the Honda and haven't missed the Toyota at all. Another plus for the Ridgeline is the comfort level on trips. All of our grandchildren live in other states, the nearest being three hours away, and the Ridgeline is very nice on long drives. Also, on those trips it gets 29 MPG. I'm very happy with this truck and would but another.

  • Varezhka I have still yet to see a Malibu on the road that didn't have a rental sticker. So yeah, GM probably lost money on every one they sold but kept it to boost their CAFE numbers.I'm personally happy that I no longer have to dread being "upgraded" to a Maxima or a Malibu anymore. And thankfully Altima is also on its way out.
  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
  • GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
  • Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
  • Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.
Next