QOTD: Can Subaru Just Go Ahead And Sell Whatever It Wants, Wherever It Wants, Whenever It Wants?

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

In September 2017, Subaru reported the company’s 70th consecutive year-over-year U.S. sales increase. That’s nearly six complete years of steadily improving U.S. sales volume.

Think of it this way: 2013 was a huge year for Subaru of America as sales had risen 59 percent over the span of just two years. But in 2013, Subaru sold 424,683 over the course of the entire calendar year. In 2017, that’s a total Subaru blasted past in the first week of September.

But have you ever stopped to notice that Subaru is accomplishing much of its success with three remarkably similar variations of the same theme? Crosstrek, Forester, Outback. A bit of extra length there, a touch of extra height here, a smidgen of savings there, a dose of extra equipment here. This is hardly the historically obvious 3 Series to 5 Series to 7 Series lineup. The Crosstrek, Forester, and Outback are conceptually similar vehicles with overlapping price spectrums. And recently, with a huge leap in Crosstrek popularity, they’re all similarly popular, too.

You almost get the sense Subaru could squeeze an Outback “four-door coupe” in there and sell 12,000 of those each month, too.

Or could they? Is the huge success of Subaru in 2017 — consistent U.S. sales growth despite a market-wide slowdown — something of a peak, nothing more than the result of inflated demand for a lineup temporarily perceived as hot?

In September, Subaru of America reported 12,491 Crosstrek sales. That’s a September record, the second-best month ever (after August’s record) and just the third month in the nameplate’s history in which the newly relaunched Crosstrek entered five-digit territory. Crosstrek pricing stretches from $22,710 to $27,210.

Subaru also sold 13,262 Foresters in September, a sharp 17-percent year-over-year drop for the Forester but still the model’s 50th consecutive month above the 10K marker. Forester pricing starts just beyond the base Crosstrek at $23,710 but reaches to a higher $37,005.

Then there’s the Outback, now Subaru’s best-selling model with 140,491 sales so far this year. September volume slid slightly, 4 percent, to 16,330 units. Outback pricing starts at $26,810, only $2000 beyond the basic Forester automatic, and soars to $39,605.

The Crosstrek, Forester, and Outback accounted for 76 percent of Subaru’s September volume.

September’s huge 51-percent Crosstrek uptick came as sales of its donor vehicle, the Impreza, jumped 32 percent. While industry-wide September incentives rose 1.5 percent, year-over-year, to $3,742 per vehicle according to ALG, Subaru’s average discount fell 6 percent to only $1,026. The auto industry’s average transaction price fell 1 percent; Subaru’s ATPs ticked up by a tenth of a percent. The industry discounted vehicles by an average of 11.5 percent in September. Subaru cut prices by less than 4 percent. Together with the Crosstrek’s rise, these financial tallies help explain the acceptable losses in Forester and Outback sales — Subaru refuses to play that game.

Is the current wave of Subaru acceptance anywhere near cresting, or could Subaru theoretically position another mid-$20,000s two-row crossover and find itself in short supply of that vehicle, too?

Subaru won’t test that theory, of course. The next vehicle stretches the range on the north side. The Ascent will be Subaru’s flagship vehicle. Based on current trends, it seems as though Subaru won’t be able to build enough to sate demand.

Can Subaru just do as it pleases, build whatever it wants, and find even more buyers than it thought possible? Or will America’s Subaru affection soon max out?

[Images: Subaru]

Timothy Cain is a contributing analyst at The Truth About Cars and Autofocus.ca and the founder and former editor of GoodCarBadCar.net. Follow on Twitter @timcaincars and Instagram.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 141 comments
  • Ryanwm80 Ryanwm80 on Oct 06, 2017

    I've been wondering why anyone would pay money for a Subaru - not bad, but nothing exceptionally great - and I feel like there's a lot of elderly people who buy these cars and Kia Souls, and I think there are two main reasons. 1) When you sit in the driver's seat the H-point is nearly at the same height as a standing, so you don't really sit "down" you just pull your knees and feet up into the car, and when you exit, you don't have to work your thighs to "sit up". 2) Price - they're inexpensive.

  • TOTitan TOTitan on Oct 06, 2017

    I enjoy driving. Subarus are not fun to drive. Most Subaru owners view them them the same as they do an Appliance.... they want it to do its job reliably. I am more of a fleet operator.... a car for the city which is a 2016 VW SportWagen a car for road trips which is a 2009 BMW 335d and a truck for towing and Hauling which is a Nissan Titan modified with big brakes and airbags. When my new house in Kiowa Colorado is done I will trade the Sport Wagon for an Alltrack

  • Varezhka I have still yet to see a Malibu on the road that didn't have a rental sticker. So yeah, GM probably lost money on every one they sold but kept it to boost their CAFE numbers.I'm personally happy that I no longer have to dread being "upgraded" to a Maxima or a Malibu anymore. And thankfully Altima is also on its way out.
  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
  • GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
  • Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
  • Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.
Next