Junkyard Find: 1983 Cadillac 'Bustleback' Seville

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

The first-generation Cadillac Seville was a sibling — or maybe first cousin — to the proletariat rear-wheel-drive Chevrolet Nova, selling well while also cheapening the Cadillac brand. The second-generation Seville, introduced for the 1980 model year, moved to the Eldorado’s front-wheel-drive platform and gained a bold “bustleback” rear body design.

Here’s an example of a Bustleback Seville I spotted last week in a Phoenix self-service wrecking yard.

“Neoclassical” kit cars reached their pinnacle of popularity during the 1970s, and all of these cars featured mash-ups of various styling cues of the 1920-1940 era. The bustle-type trunk, along with (fake) leather hood straps and (nonfunctional) side exhaust pipes, was seen on many such vehicles.

Some Cadillacs and LaSalles had bustleback trunks through the late 1930s, so there was corporate precedent.

Cadillac shoppers weren’t enthusiastic about the look in 1980, however, and sales numbers for the 1980-1985 Seville was lower than that of its predecessor.

The Arizona sun has not been kind to the upholstery inside this car.

The Touring Suspension option made the Seville handle a bit better, and included 225/70R15 radials. The cassette deck boasted auto-reverse (a highly desirable feature in 1983, when a lot of factory cassette decks didn’t even have a rewind feature) and Dolby noise reduction.

The problem-plagued V8-6-4 engine that came in the 1981 Seville was gone by 1983; this car has one of the early HT4100 V8 s, rated at 135 horsepower in 1983. The HT series of Cadillac engines continued in production into 1995, finally replaced by the Northstar V8.

“The car for those who, like you, choose to go first class… all the way.”






Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 62 comments
  • Whitworth Whitworth on Jul 25, 2017

    Even when these were relatively new I was like "what the hell are they thinking!" it was like some kit car monstrosity.

    • See 1 previous
    • Speedlaw Speedlaw on Jul 27, 2017

      @skor I worked with a guy who had one. Lincoln Continental left in the dryer too long. He loved, loved his Versalles ! GF's family had a Seville, while I had a 73 Nova. This started my lifelong obsession with "find the matching parts", which I was able to play later too, comparing my Mercury Mystique to a Jag X type. I can't report on the Seville driving, as it had a bad engine or trans mount, so if you pushed it, it made bad sounds. Also, that GF didn't like driving quickly....among her other issues. Steering Columns, plastic parts below the knee, seats, trunk fittings, and pop the hood. Switchgear. Always fun to see how many parts they can re use, or just assume "no one will notice"

  • JEFFSHADOW JEFFSHADOW on Jul 25, 2017

    Copart had one of these for sale in San Jose two years ago. Thirty-four thousand original miles, two-tone canyon yellow and brown, one owner(an attorney)and in mint condition. It sold for $3,300.

    • Speedlaw Speedlaw on Jul 27, 2017

      California Car ! Running around CA for two weeks made this salt encrusted northeastern guy cry...every single day. Volvo 240 with not a bubble ? Datsun Wagon with just a hit of sun fade ? First gen Rabbit diesel still clattering away ? Amazing !

  • Teddyc73 As I asked earlier under another article, when did "segment" or "class" become "space"? Does using that term make one feel more sophisticated? If GM's products in other segments...I mean "space" is more profitable then sedans then why shouldn't they discontinue it.
  • Robert Absolutely!!! I hate SUV's , I like the better gas milage and better ride and better handling!! Can't take a SUV 55mph into a highway exit ramp! I can in my Malibu and there's more than enough room for 5 and trunk is plenty big enough for me!
  • Teddyc73 Since when did automakers or car companies become "OEM". Probably about the same time "segment" or "class" became "space". I wish there were more sedans. I would like an American sedan. However, as others have stated, if they don't sell in large enough quantities to be profitable the automakers...I mean, "OEMs" aren't going to build them. It's simple business.
  • Varezhka I have still yet to see a Malibu on the road that didn't have a rental sticker. So yeah, GM probably lost money on every one they sold but kept it to boost their CAFE numbers.I'm personally happy that I no longer have to dread being "upgraded" to a Maxima or a Malibu anymore. And thankfully Altima is also on its way out.
  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
Next