QOTD: What to Do With Mazda?

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis

Yesterday, Steph Willems asked in his Question of the Day what BMW should do with Mini and its lineup of identical-but-different vehicles almost nobody is buying. Since it seems like you’re quite eager to give brand strategy advice, let’s do it again today.

I want you to tell me what you’d do with Mazda, because its current PR line isn’t sitting well with me.

The PR I’m referring to is from the article Tim Cain wrote on Monday, where the CEO of Mazda North America outlined consumer loyalty, market share and brand advancement desires for the company.

If you haven’t read it already, click the link above so you’re informed for the rest of our discussion and we can engage in the sort of thought-provoking, worldly dialogue I desire every single day. (Oh, and Tim gets clicks.)

Masahiro Moro’s points can be broken down into the following:

  • Mazda owner loyalty is low (39 percent vs. industry average 53 percent), and needs to increase
  • 2-percent market share is the goal, up from a current 1.7 percent
  • The 2-percent share will be obtained though quality customers, not incentives and discounts
  • Higher prices for existing products (via upscale trim levels)
  • Mazda Premium strategy, image establishment
  • Mazda does not compete in over 40 percent of the market segments in America

Now, it’s fine to say you want more of the pie, and having high-quality pie — the kind grandma makes — is the best kind of pie. But making those kinds of pies requires love, care, and many ingredients. You can’t make the pie taste better by putting it on a more expensive plate; substance is required.

To get the bullets above pointed in directions Mazda desires, I think it still needs to make a few changes, and they’re substantive.

  • Address the NVH (noise, vibration, and harshness) issues present in all Mazda models across the range
  • Improve dealer coverage throughout the nation, because you can’t buy from a dealer that doesn’t exist
  • A premium image requires a V6 option, even if you borrow it from another company, like Toyota
  • Offer diesel options across the range to support diesel enthusiasts
  • Address that 40-percent segment deficiency with new models, and a modular architecture (like VW)
  • Dump the “Driving Matters” preachy tagline, because the 375 people who care about that are already buying Mazda anyway

Certainly, I’m missing some points, and no doubt you’ll tell me I’m wrong on some of them. But Mazda needs to get the ball rolling here.

So tell me, what would you do with Mazda at your command?

[Image: Mazda]

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 161 comments
  • Crossx5 Crossx5 on Jun 03, 2017

    Being a current mazda owner, I can suggest my wish list here, along with usual suggestions in the article. I think they need a couple of things. - A differentiated product line like i and s. Where s can carry forward their current idea and i can evolve to more mainstream comfortable cars. - s can adopt higher power, rather more torque, engines like 2.5 or 2.2d turbos. - i can adopt to a higher combined power using borrowed hybrid tech. I recall toyota was licensing their for free. - Probably more niche products like mazda3/6 wagons. I would readily trade my cx5 for a 2.2d turbo mazda 6 alltrack wagon. A similar type formula had done wonders for Subaru. They didn't fight battles on other's ground buy created a new ground altogether.

  • Dash323 Dash323 on Aug 28, 2017

    Make that 2.5 the base model engine and retune the 2.5t so that the turbo doesn't pull as earl as it does in the CX-9. Now, this is an idea I've had since the new RF came out: Take the Miata power train and make coupe with the hatchback body lines of the 3. Maybe put in that 2.5 or 2.5t. I'm guessing the extra hp would offset the weight from making it a hatchback. Call it the MX-3.

  • Mason Had this identical car as a 17 year old in the late 90's. What a ball of fun, one of many I wish I still had.
  • FinnEss At my age, sedans are difficult to get into without much neck and hip adjustment.I apologize sincerely but that is just the way it is. A truck is my ride of choice.Pronto
  • Ajla The market for sedans is weaker than it once was but I think some of you are way overstating the situation and I disagree that the sales numbers show sedans are some niche thing that full line manufacturers should ignore. There are still a sizeable amount of sales. This isn't sports car volume. So far this year the Camry and Civic are selling in the top 10, with the Corolla in 11 and the Accord, Sentra, and Model 3 in the top 20. And sedan volume is off it's nadir from a few years ago with many showing decent growth over the last two years, growth that is outpacing utilities. Cancelling all sedans now seems more of an error than back when Ford did it.
  • Duties The U.S . would have enough energy to satisfy our needs and export energy if JoeBama hadn’t singlehandedly shut down U.S. energy exploration and production. Furthermore, at current rates of consumption, the U.S. has over two centuries of crude oil, https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/energy/exclusive-current-rates-consumption-us-has-more-two-centuries-oil-report.Imagine we lived in a world where all cars were EV's. And then along comes a new invention: the Internal Combustion Engine.Think how well they would sell. A vehicle HALF the weight, HALF the price that would cause only a quarter of the damage to the road. A vehicle that could be refueled in 1/10th the time, with a range of 4 times the distance in all weather conditions. One that does not rely on the environmentally damaging use of non-renewable rare earth elements to power it, and uses far less steel and other materials. A vehicle that could carry and tow far heavier loads. And is less likely to explode in your garage in the middle of the night and burn down your house with you in it. And ran on an energy source that is readily extracted with hundreds of years known supply.Just think how excited people would be for such technology. It would sell like hot cakes, with no tax credits! Whaddaya think? I'd buy one.
  • 3SpeedAutomatic I just road in a rental Malibu this past week. Interior was a bit plasticity, but, well built.Only issue was how “low” the seat was in relation to the ground. I had to crawl “down” into the seat. Also, windscreen was at 65 degree angle which invited multiple reflections. Just to hack off the EPA, how about a boxy design like Hyundai is doing with some of its SUVs. 🚙 Raise the seat one or two inches and raise the roof line accordingly. Would be a hit with the Uber and Lyft crowd as well as some taxi service.🚗 🚗🚗
Next