Junkyard Find: 1974 Cadillac Fleetwood Sixty Special Brougham

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

1974 was a rough year to be an American, but the Cadillac Division wasn’t about to give up on selling opulent two-and-a-half-ton highway dreadnaughts to the plutocracy ( that came later).

Here’s a well-banged-up Fleetwood Sixty Special Brougham, spotted in a San Francisco Bay Area self-service wrecking yard last month.

Fleetwood was a coachbuilding company with English roots, absorbed by the Fisher Body Corporation and then into General Motors during the 1920s. The very last Cadillac Fleetwoods were sold for the 1996 model year; I photographed a ’96 Fleetwood Brougham in its final parking spot back in 2013. For you fans of Malaise Era Fleetwoods in this series, we also have this salt-water-assaulted ’74 and this ’76.

Joyce must have been very proud of her comfy, road-owning Cad back in the middle 1970s.

I recall seeing this exact sticker for sale in gas-station convenience stores in about 1974, while on family road trips in our ’73 Beauville. Could you bring yourself to slap a cheap decal on the dash of a car that sold for $9,537, which is about $50,000 today? Joyce managed the feat.

The 472-cubic-inch V8 in this car took a serious performance hit in 1974, thanks to a perfect storm of corporate and government incompetence (you may apportion blame between the two sides as you see fit, according to the narrative favored by your side of the Culture Wars), and was rated at a grim 205 horsepower. That’s 26 horses per liter of engine displacement, which compares unfavorably to the 134 horsepower-per-liter ratio achieved by the base engine in the 2017 Cadillac CTS. That said, this engine still managed to generate a respectable 380 pound-feet of torque and the Fleetwood had no trouble cruising effortlessly at 80 mph … oh, wait.

Sometimes it’s hard to tell what tipping point allowed a car to topple into a place like this, but we can see that Joyce’s Cad suffered a wreck that contributed that last bit of depreciation. The way these things seem to work, we can assume the car that bashed Joyce’s Cad was something with about 0.0001% of the class of the Fleetwood, a forgettable machine from the distant fringes of the GM empire.

Cadillac’s pursuit of big market share contributed to the de-exclusivization of the marque during the Malaise Era.








Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 82 comments
  • DEUSVULTbuddy DEUSVULTbuddy on May 26, 2017

    Ah yes, the Cadillac Fleetwood Broughams. I have an uncle down by San Bernardino, Ca who brought a brand new (black) 76' Fleetwood Brougham sedan back 1976. I don't know too much about the ride, because my uncle wouldn't talk much about it, but I do know that he drove the Fleetwood for around 20 years before the engine reach it maximum lifetime. Since then the car sits in his drive way, coming down with rust and parts missing (or falling off). It totally became a rust bucket when I first laid eyes on it. Him and his family never really thought about getting rid of it, since he loved that car so much. When I get better on understanding cars more, I hope to restore it one day because his car sparked my interest into cars when I still small.

  • Bultaco Bultaco on Jun 08, 2017

    I had a turquoise 1970 DeVille convertible for a summer in college. Must have been around 1983. I bought it for $600 to drive while I restored my TR6. With the high compression 472 (I think it was rated over 350hp in 1970 gross hp) it would light the 78-series rear tires at will and turn them into vapor. I think the combo of skinny tires, decent power, and vast tons of road-hugging weight created an inertial perfect storm for tire smokage. Upon seeing it for the first time, in all its bloated, hideous splendor, the owner of the bar where I worked remarked "that's the god-damndest automobile I've ever seen". I sold it for what I paid for it at the end of the summer.

  • Varezhka I have still yet to see a Malibu on the road that didn't have a rental sticker. So yeah, GM probably lost money on every one they sold but kept it to boost their CAFE numbers.I'm personally happy that I no longer have to dread being "upgraded" to a Maxima or a Malibu anymore. And thankfully Altima is also on its way out.
  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
  • GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
  • Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
  • Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.
Next