Speed King: Ferrari's 812 Superfast Is, Well, You Know…

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Vehicle names are often lies. Take LTD, for example. Demon? No proof of possession, at least none that can be recognized by the Catholic Church.

Ferrari, on the other hand, has introduced a new Geneva-bound model that aptly sums up its purpose through its name: Superfast. Yes, the Ferrarri 812 Superfast is, unsurprisingly, just that.

As a successor to the F12 Berlinetta, the 812 Superfast needs to do things in a gutsier manner than the model that came before. It’s also the 70th anniversary of the first Ferrari-badged car, so it only made sense for the prancing pony to make this model its fastest and most powerful production offering to date.

Avoiding any form of forced induction, the 812 Superfast’s 5.5-liter V12 makes 790 horsepower and 530 lb-ft of torque. Yes, it’s a screamer, making peak power at a lofty 8,500 rpm. Maximum torque arrives at 7,000 rpm, though a driver can still capture 80 percent of that figure at engine speeds half that.

What is all of this caged energy good for? According to Ferrari, zero to 62 miles per hour should fly by in 2.9 seconds, with a top speed of somewhere above 211 mph as a target should anyone want to pursue it.

Weight distribution on this front-engined ride, which weighs less than 2,400 pounds when dry, falls 53 percent to the rear, 47 percent up front. A seven-speed dual-clutch transmission sends power to the rear wheels. Electric power steering makes its brand debut, and Ferrari promises an updated version of Slide Slip Control to preserve the Superfast after the happy customer peels out of the lot.

Price? There is no price, at least not yet. Ferrari will have all the details on this ultra-lux performer at its official unveiling next month at the Geneva Motor Show.

As for the name, not only is is applicable — it’s also historical. The moniker originated on a version of the 410 Superamerica that appeared in 1956. Later, the 1964-1966 500 Superfast carried the name to prominence.

[Images: Ferrari]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 24 comments
  • Philadlj Philadlj on Feb 17, 2017

    I dunno, it looks like it was sculpted by cold, expensive computers rather than warm human hands like the Ferraris of yore. (probably because it was).

  • NeilM NeilM on Feb 18, 2017

    Now that we're well over 50 years into the era of the mid-engine supercar — I count from the 1966 Lamborghini Miura — I'm finding it hard to warm up to the proportions of these cab backward designs. Ferrari, with its need to accommodate the length of a V12 engine, has a bit more excuse than Corvette with its short V8, but even so the front seems too long and the rear overhang oddly short. Pretty sure I wouldn't kick an 812 out of bed though...

    • Markogts Markogts on Feb 18, 2017

      Well, it's necessary for weight distribution. Put the engine forward, but not too much :-)

  • Urlik You missed the point. The Feds haven’t changed child labor laws so it is still illegal under Federal law. No state has changed their law so that it goes against a Federal child labor hazardous order like working in a slaughter house either.
  • Plaincraig 1975 Mercury Cougar with the 460 four barrel. My dad bought it new and removed all the pollution control stuff and did a lot of upgrades to the engine (450hp). I got to use it from 1986 to 1991 when I got my Eclipse GSX. The payments and insurance for a 3000GT were going to be too much. No tickets no accidents so far in my many years and miles.My sister learned on a 76 LTD with the 350 two barrel then a Ford Escort but she has tickets (speeding but she has contacts so they get dismissed or fine and no points) and accidents (none her fault)
  • Namesakeone If I were the parent of a teenage daughter, I would want her in an H1 Hummer. It would be big enough to protect her in a crash, too big for her to afford the fuel (and thus keep her home), big enough to intimidate her in a parallel-parking situation (and thus keep her home), and the transmission tunnel would prevent backseat sex.If I were the parent of a teenage son, I would want him to have, for his first wheeled transportation...a ride-on lawnmower. For obvious reasons.
  • ToolGuy If I were a teen under the tutelage of one of the B&B, I think it would make perfect sense to jump straight into one of those "forever cars"... see then I could drive it forever and not have to worry about ever replacing it. This plan seems flawless, doesn't it?
  • Rover Sig A short cab pickup truck, F150 or C/K-1500 or Ram, preferably a 6 cyl. These have no room for more than one or two passengers (USAA stats show biggest factor in teenage accidents is a vehicle full of kids) and no back seat (common sense tells you what back seats are used for). In a full-size pickup truck, the inevitable teenage accident is more survivable. Second choice would be an old full-size car, but these have all but disappeared from the used car lots. The "cute small car" is a death trap.
Next