24/7 Wall St. Declares 'Book by Cadillac' a Failure; Cadillac Shrugs Off Questions

Mark Stevenson
by Mark Stevenson

General Motors’ luxury division isn’t content with brewing coffee and showing off fashionable new threads at its new SoHo space — it also wants you to drive its cars.

Book by Cadillac, a monthly subscription lease service that launched one month ago, aims to get more people in the metal to the tune of $1,500 a month — and 24/7 Wall St. is already calling it a “major flop.”

According to the self-described “financial news and opinion” website, “[Uwe] Ellinghaus [Cadillac’s chief marketing officer] in particular has to be humiliated,” as there aren’t enough subscriptions available to supply the demand.

Say what now?

24/7 Wall St.’s argument centers on Book’s supposedly discerning clientele and the service’s current waitlist.

Consumers with enough cash in hand to spend $1,500 a month on a luxury vehicle subscription service, the site argues, want what Cadillac is offering — but they want it now, and they don’t want to be placed on a waitlist.

It is worth reminding Cadillac that luxury car owners do want “white glove” service, and not a misstep that will put many people off enough that some may never become customers.

However, 24/7 Wall St.’s opinion writer seemingly ignores a generally accepted belief of success: if demand outstrips supply for a particular product or service, it’s considered a success and not a “major flop.”

Still, we reached out to Cadillac to find out what factors currently limit available subscriptions, how many people are on the waitlist, and what the automaker is doing to make more subscriptions available.

Cadillac responded with a nearly audible shrug.

Cadillac spokesperson David Caldwell said there’s “not much more to be said now” regarding Book, but “aspects surely will evolve” and the program “will be confirmed or adjusted based on learnings from the implementation” as “the team focuses on the new project and new customers.”

So much for clarity.

Book is only available in New York City as of today, and the program’s logistics — the delivery of vehicles, etc. — are handled by local Cadillac dealers. Cadillac has not announced a timeline for Book’s expansion to other markets.

Mark Stevenson
Mark Stevenson

More by Mark Stevenson

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 22 comments
  • Speedlaw Speedlaw on Feb 05, 2017

    There's a W2 mentality at work here. The customer at this price point writes off the car or charges it to a business. The costs of the car are thus hidden or moved to another entity. I see a bunch of W2 folks looking at the costs of ownership in NYC, not realizing the way the car is actually costed out. Yes, $900 per month garage, $2500 per year insurance, etc, adds up fast, but that car is also registered outside NYC-relative or vacation home, so those aren't real numbers for many either.

  • Bollocks666 Bollocks666 on Feb 06, 2017

    So much untrue in this article, for starters Cadillac dealers have nothing to do with this. Zero. Cadillac hired a high end fleet management firm to handle it. Clients will never have to deal with a "dealer" Cars are delivered to their doors. And when supply exceeds demand how is that a failure? Just stating few facts.

  • Varezhka I have still yet to see a Malibu on the road that didn't have a rental sticker. So yeah, GM probably lost money on every one they sold but kept it to boost their CAFE numbers.I'm personally happy that I no longer have to dread being "upgraded" to a Maxima or a Malibu anymore. And thankfully Altima is also on its way out.
  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
  • GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
  • Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
  • Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.
Next