EXCLUSIVE: A Group of Investors Attempted to Buy Dodge Viper, Tooling, Assembly Facility From FCA

Ronnie Schreiber
by Ronnie Schreiber

After Fiat Chrysler Automobiles announced that 2017 would be the last model year for the Viper, I suggested a wealthy collector, or perhaps a group of Viper dealers, could conceivably keep the V10-powered supercar alive.

It turns out that suggestion wasn’t too far from the mark.

According to James Glickenhaus, the former movie director, actor and financial professional who owns a significant collection of rare and unique collectible cars, a group of well-heeled enthusiasts attempted to buy Viper from FCA several years ago, but the group decided against the move after due diligence.


During the due diligence process, the group of investors engaged Glickenhaus for advice on the deal.

“A private group wanted to buy Viper and approached FCA who were receptive. This private group asked me for advice and I gave it to them,” Glickenhaus told TTAC.

But it was all for naught.

“A deal was not reached. They did have the resources to do the deal but in the end decided not to (buy Viper and its facility). I did advise them not to do this deal but why they didn’t isn’t something I know,” said Glickenhaus.

A spokesperson for FCA, who contacted Viper brand management, stated “the company is not shopping the Viper to other manufacturers” at this point in time.

However, FCA would not offer any detail on past discussions.

“Like most automotive OEMs, FCA explores a wide variety of B2B opportunities on an ongoing basis. Such discussions are made and maintained in the highest confidence,” said the spokesperson.

Glickenhaus, while attending the Concours of America at St. John’s and the related auction by Sotheby’s RM, said that any prospective buyer would need to sell about three times the number of Vipers annually that Chrysler’s been selling lately just to break even.

FCA has sold about 650 Vipers a year since it returned to production for the 2013 model year. That would mean the V10-powered sportscar’s break even point is about 2,000 cars a year, a figure the Viper has only reached once in the past 15 years, in 2003.

Those figures likely explain why FCA wants to get out of the Viper business.

[Images: © 2016 Ronnie Schreiber/The Truth About Cars]

Ronnie Schreiber
Ronnie Schreiber

Ronnie Schreiber edits Cars In Depth, the original 3D car site.

More by Ronnie Schreiber

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 51 comments
  • Seanx37 Seanx37 on Aug 04, 2016

    Here's the thing. It doesn't matter. No one buys the damn things. I love just the idea of a Viper. But it doesn't make money. Never made money. Never will make money. I live 20 minutes from where they make them. And I have seen exactly 1 on the roads in the last 5 years. I saw one at a dealer. Marked down $30k. And it sat there for months. That's it.

  • ExPatBrit ExPatBrit on Aug 05, 2016

    The Viper is an anachronism , a car like that with all that power and a truck transmission is not going to sell. No available automatic so they eliminated 90% of their target market, somewhat forgivable back at the original launch but not now, when even Ferrari probably sell more slush boxes.

    • See 1 previous
    • Corey Lewis Corey Lewis on Aug 05, 2016

      @FormerFF Nope, last real manual for Ferrari was the 599 GTB about four years ago.

  • Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
  • Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.
  • Wjtinfwb Not proud of what Stellantis is rolling out?
  • Wjtinfwb Absolutely. But not incredibly high-tech, AWD, mega performance sedans with amazing styling and outrageous price tags. GM needs a new Impala and LeSabre. 6 passenger, comfortable, conservative, dead nuts reliable and inexpensive enough for a family guy making 70k a year or less to be able to afford. Ford should bring back the Fusion, modernized, maybe a bit bigger and give us that Hybrid option again. An updated Taurus, harkening back to the Gen 1 and updated version that easily hold 6, offer a huge trunk, elevated handling and ride and modest power that offers great fuel economy. Like the GM have a version that a working mom can afford. The last decade car makers have focused on building cars that American's want, but eliminated what they need. When a Ford Escape of Chevy Blazer can be optioned up to 50k, you've lost the plot.
  • Willie If both nations were actually free market economies I would be totally opposed. The US is closer to being one, but China does a lot to prop up the sectors they want to dominate allowing them to sell WAY below cost, functionally dumping their goods in our market to destroy competition. I have seen this in my area recently with shrimp farmed by Chinese comglomerates being sold super cheap to push local producers (who have to live at US prices and obey US laws) out of business.China also has VERY lax safety and environmental laws which reduce costs greatly. It isn't an equal playing field, they don't play fair.
Next