Bipartisan Bill Aims to Kill EPA Racecar Regulation

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Attention, racecar enthusiasts: Your Congressional representatives are looking out for you!

Normally, this phrase would be met with suspicion and outright fear, but for those fighting the Environmental Protection Agency’s proposed regulation on racecar conversions, it’s the best news they’ve had in weeks.

A bipartisan bill introduced in Congress would protect the track-only use of modified street vehicles for use in competition, a practice the EPA is seeking to prohibit.

The Recognizing the Protection of Motorsports Act of 2016 (RPM Act), introduced by three Republicans and one Democrat, aims to keep converted race vehicles away from the tentacles of the EPA. The bill has been sent to the House Energy and Commerce Committee for consideration.

Racecars are exempt under the Clean Air Act, but there was panic in racing circles when it was revealed the regulatory body had published draft legislation last summer that would make it illegal to modify a street car into a racecar. The EPA saw the modifications as a “tampering” of regulated on-road vehicles, and proposed that the sale and purchase of products involved in the conversions would be subject to the same law.

By the time, the Specialty Equipment Market Association (SEMA) found out about the proposal just before the New Year, it was too late to comment. Since the EPA proposal was revealed to the public a month ago, over 163,000 people have signed a White House petition calling on the EPA to back off.

Raucous applause is already emanating from the SEMA camp.

“The EPA’s new interpretation of the Clean Air Act would essentially rewrite the law and 46 years of policy and practice,” said SEMA President and CEO Chris Kersting.

“Without congressional intervention, the racing community and racing parts manufacturers would be operating outside of that new law and could be targeted for enforcement.”

Racing products represent a $1.4 billion annual market, and would be “decimated” if the EPA were to follow through on their plans, according to SEMA. The legislation would have the same effect on hundreds of American racetracks and all associated industries.

The EPA is expected to finalize its regulations this summer, meaning a tsunami of phone calls and emails from opponents will be reaching Congressional representatives very soon.

[Image: Moto “Club4AG” Miwa/Flickr]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 22 comments
  • SoCalMikester SoCalMikester on Mar 09, 2016

    if the EPA really wanted to do something useful, theyd mandate OBD2 emissions checks in all states/counties that dont have checks. No dyno, no visual, no sniffer even. Make it cheap and easy.

  • Shaker Shaker on Mar 10, 2016

    "...if the EPA really wanted to do something useful..." I think that the EPA should re-institute rebates on hybrid vehicles (especially CUV's/SUV's) to encourage sales and get the fleet MPG numbers to start rising again - that would be money well-spent. Low gas prices are reaffirming denial on buyers and manufacturers alike.

  • Redapple2 Focus and Fiesta are better than Golf? (overall?) I liked the rentals I had. I would pick these over a Malibu even though it was a step down in class and the rental co would not reduce price.
  • Teddyc73 Oh good lord here we go again criticizing Cadillac for alphanumeric names. It's the same old tired ridiculous argument, and it makes absolutely no sense. Explain to me why alphanumeric names are fine for every other luxury brand....except Cadillac. What young well-off buyer is walking around thinking "Wow, Cadillac is a luxury brand but I thought they had interesting names?" No one. Cadillac's designations don't make sense? And other brands do? Come on.
  • Flashindapan Emergency mid year refresh of all Cadillac models by graphing on plastic fenders and making them larger than anything from Stellantis or Ford.
  • Bd2 Eh, the Dollar has held up well against most other currencies and the IRA is actually investing in critical industries, unlike the $6 Trillion in pandemic relief/stimulus which was just a cash giveaway (also rife with fraud).What Matt doesn't mention is that the price of fuel (particularly diesel) is higher relative to the price of oil due to US oil producers exporting records amount of oil and refiners exporting records amount of fuel. US refiners switched more and more production to diesel fuel, which lowers the supply of gas here (inflating prices). But shouldn't that mean low prices for diesel?Nope, as refiners are just exporting the diesel overseas, including to Mexico.
  • Jor65756038 As owner of an Opel Ampera/Chevrolet Volt and a 1979 Chevy Malibu, I will certainly not buy trash like the Bolt or any SUV or crossover. If GM doesn´t offer a sedan, then I will buy german, sweedish, italian, asian, Tesla or whoever offers me a sedan. Not everybody like SUV´s or crossovers or is willing to buy one no matter what.
Next