What's Going On With The UAW Deal With GM?

Aaron Cole
by Aaron Cole

On Thursday, United Auto Workers Vice President Cindy Estrada told local union officials that she would recommend to union President Dennis Williams that the labor group ratify its contract with General Motors despite its rejection by skilled trades workers, according to Automotive News.

On Friday, Williams announced on the UAW’s website that the union would go back to GM to discuss those workers’ issues with the proposed contract that was approved more than one week ago. On Friday afternoon, Estrada announced in a separate letter that she would support further negotiation with the automaker over skilled trades workers’ concerns.

Um, what’s going on?

Workers at GM plants voiced their concerns on the union’s Facebook page after Estrada’s announcement.

This is absolutely absurd. Ford will have a contract ratified before we will and ours started a week before. Why in the world is there an extension made? So because of Skilled Trades, I have to wait ANOTHER WEEK for something that passed. Great job, UAW.

According to the union, nearly 56 percent of union workers agreed to a proposed contract with the automaker that would grant pay raises, profit sharing and other financial bonuses for workers. However, a majority of skilled trades workers rejected that deal, based in part, because of broader job definitions that could result in multiple duties. Skilled trades workers reportedly also took exception from being excluded from a $60,000 buyout for workers near retirement.

According to the Detroit News, workers are worried about job safety if skilled trades workers are spread too thin.

“One of the biggest aspects is safety …” John Ilgenfritz, a skilled trades worker at GM’s Wentzville Assembly Plant in Missouri told the Detroit News. “Someone is going to get hurt and it’s going to be because of this.”

Union officials extended its 2011 contract with the automaker to work through its proposed contract.

Even if skilled trades workers reject the contract, union officials may cement the deal with GM. That happened in 2011 when Chrysler skilled trades workers rejected their deal that was ultimately approved by the union.

Aaron Cole
Aaron Cole

More by Aaron Cole

Comments
Join the conversation
9 of 17 comments
  • SCE to AUX SCE to AUX on Nov 14, 2015

    The United Auto Workers don't seem so united right now. I guess I don't understand how this system works.

  • Xeranar Xeranar on Nov 15, 2015

    Watching HDC & Big Al discuss how collective bargaining works reminds me of my lower-level classes trying to discuss the presidency. It's full of misconceptions and outright silliness. For the most part this hangup is a mixture of job security and job safety. It's nice of interesting to use a random person on FB for a quote to get 'union sentiment' or anything else. But I'm not exactly worried about the UAW. The future is actually looking better for collective bargaining as various economists are starting to support a more corporatist relationship between capital and labor but is unlikely to change until chunks of taft-hartley and thrown away and that looks increasingly likely in a new 5-4/6-3 supreme court. Especially if this current court makes more aggressive changes (essentially opening the door to unraveling them immediately and solidifying decades of control).

    • See 6 previous
    • Xeranar Xeranar on Nov 16, 2015

      @Big Al from Oz Yes yes, cold war propaganda jargon...you do realize that's the proper scientific term for unionism, right? It's actually far stronger in Canada and even stronger in Australia. The irony that you seem to make is getting into CJ territories. We all get it, you're anti-union with HD or rather, you think the world works dramatically different and unions aren't necessary. Whatever the case may be try to keep it to earth since most of what you're saying is patently false or obnoxiously naive.

  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
  • GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
  • Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
  • Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.
  • Wjtinfwb Not proud of what Stellantis is rolling out?
Next