Ford UAW Workers Narrowly Approve Contract, UAW Executive Board Ratifies GM Deal

Ronnie Schreiber
by Ronnie Schreiber

A week before Thanksgiving, the United Auto Workers and all of the domestic automakers know they will enter the holiday season without having to worry about a strike.

According to the Detroit News, the UAW announced late Friday that their members at Ford approved a proposed contract by a narrow 51.4-percent margin.

That news followed closely the union’s announcement that its International Executive Board considered ratified its contract with General Motors. It will go into effect starting next week. That deal had been delayed because, although the overall vote was in favor of the contract, almost 60 percent of skilled trade members of the UAW at GM voted against it.

The news from the UAW’s Ford and GM departments follows the union’s ratification last month of a contract with Fiat Chrysler that had been revised from an earlier rejected proposed contract.

The contract vote at Ford went down to the wire, but it was finally ratified because of overwhelming, 70-plus-percent approval at late-voting Local 600, which represents 5,900 workers at the Dearborn Truck and Dearborn Stamping plants.

In a statement, UAW President Dennis Williams said, “Our UAW members have ratified the national agreement after a long process and much debate. The voice of the majority has secured a strong future that will provide job security and economic stability for themselves and their families.”

Ford’s executive vice president for manufacturing and labor affairs, John Fleming said, “This agreement provides a good foundation for Ford Motor Company, our employees and our communities as we work together to create an even stronger business in the years ahead.”

At GM, the UAW’s National GM Council, which includes ranking officials from all UAW locals and shops, met Friday morning to discuss the 2015 contract. That followed a two week review looking into why the contract, which had been approved by a majority of GM UAW members a month ago was voted down by members in the skilled trades. Following that meeting, the union’s International Executive Board met and ratified the contract.

According to UAW bylaws, a rejection of a contract by skilled trades members can be overruled by the executive board if the board finds that those members who voted against the contract did so for reasons that are not unique to their job classifications. Skilled trades workers opposing the deal expressed concerns over local contract agreements, reclassification of trades, numbers of apprentices, outsourcing, manpower reductions, and a lack of cost of living increases and buyouts in the national contract. The UAW’s hierarchy deemed those concerns to not be unique to the skilled trades and considered the contract ratified.

Ronnie Schreiber
Ronnie Schreiber

Ronnie Schreiber edits Cars In Depth, the original 3D car site.

More by Ronnie Schreiber

Comments
Join the conversation
15 of 53 comments
  • Pch101 Pch101 on Nov 21, 2015

    CANBERRA - Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull announced on Friday that Australia will be changing its name to Moronica. "We have a lot of bogans who spend their days online looking like idiots and otherwise giving us a bad reputation, so we may as well accept it," Mr. Turnbull said in a speech before Parliament. In conjunction with this announcement, the prime minister announced that he will be growing a mullet and driving a Falcon Ute as his official state vehicle. "I need the ute to carry my beer," Mr. Turnbull added.

    • See 12 previous
    • DenverMike DenverMike on Nov 23, 2015

      @Big Al from Oz To their credit though, their trolling is on a world class level. If the casual reader knows little to zero on the subject, they could easily take BAFO and RR's comments as facts. Many of their carefully concocted statements make perfect sense on a superficial level, until you look deeper, and it becomes obvious you've been trolled. Most of the rest are simply 'hit and run' tactics. You call them out on their crap, except they've already scampered off to another thread, article or site. So when they repeat their same crap again, they can claim ignorance, I guess. Lots of ad hominem attacks from them too, facts twisted, lopsided comparisons, etc. They're good at what they do. I don't understand their motivation though. But there has to be a 'support staff' too. No way they're smart/fast enough to do it on their own. TTAC isn't the only site they disrupt. Not by a long shot.

  • 50merc 50merc on Nov 22, 2015

    UAW members must be the hardest-to-please people on the planet. They get job security and even more lush compensation (the envy of 99.44% of the blue collar world), and barely half approve the deal? I suspect the "nay" vote comes from those who wanted a strike to get a vacation; after all, the eventual signing bonus would cover any lost pay.

  • Joe65688619 I agree there should be more sedans, but recognize the trend. There's still a market for performance oriented-drivers. IMHO a low budget sedan will always be outsold by a low budget SUV. But a sports sedan, or a well executed mid-level sedan (the Accord and Camry) work. Smaller market for large sedans except I think for an older population. What I'm hoping to see is some consolidation across brands - the TLX for example is not selling well, but if it was offered only in the up-level configurations it would not be competing with it's Honda sibling. I know that makes the market smaller and niche, but that was the original purpose of the "luxury" brands - badge-engineering an existing platform at a relatively lower cost than a different car and sell it with a higher margin for buyers willing and able to pay for them. Also creates some "brand cachet." But smart buyers know that simple badging and slightly better interiors are usually not worth the cost. Put the innovative tech in the higher-end brands first, differentiate they drivetrain so it's "better" (the RDX sells well for Acura, same motor and tranmission, added turbo which makes a notable difference compared to the CRV). The sedan in many Western European countries is the "family car" as opposed to micro and compact crossovers (which still sell big, but can usually seat no more than a compact sedan).
  • Jonathan IMO the hatchback sedans like the Audi A5 Sportback, the Kia Stinger, and the already gone Buick Sportback are the answer to SUVs. The A5 and the AWD version of the Stinger being the better overall option IMO. I drive the A5, and love the depth and size of the trunk space as well as the low lift over. I've yet to find anything I need to carry that I can't, although I admit I don't carry things like drywall, building materials, etc. However, add in the fun to drive handling characteristics, there's almost no SUV that compares.
  • C-b65792653 I'm starting to wonder about Elon....again!!I see a parallel with Henry Ford who was the wealthiest industrialist at one time. Henry went off on a tangent with the peace ship for WWI, Ford TriMotor, invasive social engineering, etc. Once the economy went bad, the focus fell back to cars. Elon became one of the wealthiest industrialist in the 21st century. Then he went off with the space venture, boring holes in the ground venture, "X" (formerly Twitter), etc, etc, etc. Once Tesla hit a plateau and he realized his EVs were a commodity, he too is focused on his primary money making machine. Yet, I feel Elon is over reacting. Down sizing is the nature of the beast in the auto industry; you can't get around that. But hacking the Super Charger division is like cutting off your own leg. IIRC, GM and Ford were scheduled to sign on to the exclusive Tesla charging format. That would have doubled or tripled his charging opportunity. I wonder what those at the Renaissance Center and the Glass House are thinking now. As alluded to, there's blood in the water and other charging companies will fill the void. I believe other nations have standardized EV charging (EU & China). Elon had the chance to have his charging system as the default in North America. Now, he's dropped the ball. He's lost considerable influence on what the standardized format will eventually be. Tremendous opportunity lost. 🚗🚗🚗
  • Tassos I never used winter tires, and the last two decades I am driving almost only rear wheel drive cars, half of them in MI. I always bought all season tires for them, but the diff between touring and non touring flavors never came up. Does it make even the smallest bit of difference? (I will not read the lengthy article because I believe it does not).
  • Lou_BC ???
Next