Hammer Time: What Should Have Been

Steven Lang
by Steven Lang

I remember looking at the then brand new Ford Five Hundred and thinking to myself, “This would make one heck of a Volvo.”

Like the Volvos of yore this Ford offered a squarish conservative appearance. A high seating position which Volvo’s ‘safety oriented’ customers would have appreciated. Toss in a cavernous interior that had all the potential for a near-luxury family car, or even a wagon, and this car looked more ‘Volvo’ than ‘Ford’ to me with each passing day.

Something had to be done…

Hmmm… why not subtract ‘twenty’ from the Five Hundred name. Call it a 480, and put in a nice classic Volvo styled fascia on the front end. Throw in an interior inspired by the best of Swedish design and, Voila! Ford would have offered a Volvo that would have hit the square peg of the brand’s main customers… and maybe even a few others who were considering an upscale Camry or a Lexus ES.

Sadly Ford never made a Volvo version of the Five Hundred, or the Flex for that matter. Instead they mis-balanced the diverging priorities of competing simultaneously with BMW (S40’s, C30’s, S60’s) and conservative middle-aged Americans who valued luxury transport over driving dynamics (Xc90, XC60, C70). The brand became a disaster.

I am starting to see the same ingredients mixed into other brands these days. Take for instance Scion.

Yes this brand will get a nice pop and halo in the form of the upcoming FR-S. Then again, halo sports cars that are shared with other brands tend to be short-lived. Just ask Pontiac and Saturn about the Solstice and the Sky.

So what would be the perfect car to put into Scion’s kinship?

Two years ago I would have strongly argued for making the CT200h a Scion. It didn’t have the luxury trappings of a Lexus. However it offered tons of sporting character and attracted the type of youthful and educated audience that Scion sorely needed at that point.

You know. The type of people that quickly walked away from Scion after they started marketing bloated SUV-like compacts that should have been marketed as… Toyotas… or Volvos. Who knows.

Wait a second. YOU know!

A lot of potentially great cars over the years have been marketed to the wrong brands for the wrong reasons. So I ask the B&B, “What cars were given the wrong brand, and where should they have gone?”.

Like most marketing classes in modern day MBA-land there are no right answers. Just SWAG’s and opinions. Feel free to demote a Cadillac to a Chevy if you must. So long as you can defend it, let’s hear it.

Steven Lang
Steven Lang

More by Steven Lang

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 49 comments
  • Bkmurph Bkmurph on Jan 15, 2012

    GM never should have foisted the Chevrolet Cobalt and Saturn Ion upon North American buyers. Instead, they should have given us the Opel Astra sedan/hatch/estate under the Chevrolet and Saturn brands. Maybe they could have sold the sedan as a Chevrolet and given the hatch and wagon to Saturn to capture the younger, more 'edgy' buyer. Maybe they could have given all three body styles to both brands -- it wouldn't be the most egregious badge engineering GM has done.

    • Chicagoland Chicagoland on Mar 24, 2012

      Saturn did get the Aura hatchbacks, but they flopped. And were only sold for one model year. '08 I think should have made Cobalt just better over all, and not 'well at least it's better than the Cavalier!'

  • Servaas Servaas on Jan 15, 2012

    Over here in the EU, Volvo's are hot. Lots and lots of them everywhere, great quality, great drive. All models have received updates, new models are here, looking pretty good. Disclaimer: I just traded in my 87 MB 300 for a 99 v70. And than I started noticing them everywhere. I'm amazed.

  • Kcflyer On the bright side I just saw a commercial where the army is advertising the fact that women are now part of tank crews. I'm sure the compromises necessary to put women in front line combat arms won't in any way weaken our armed forces ability to win wars in the future. But, hey, at least that new BYD SUV will cost more, thanks uncle Joe.
  • User This story fails to cite any regulation or trade journal to support the claim that a law suddenly prevented the sale of a product in a market.
  • 28-Cars-Later I have these archaic things called CDs.
  • Wjtinfwb If you've ever been a supplier to a Big 3 automaker, this is just another Thursday. Manufacturers use their clout to pressure suppliers to extract every nano-cent of profit possible and have that ability as they usually have a line of potential vendors waiting to take your place. It can be profitable business if you manage expenses very tightly and volume meets or exceeds expectations. But if it doesn't, like in a year with significant strike-caused production stoppages, profitability for the year is likely out the window.
  • Daniel J How's that working when these companies have to pay UAW workers more?
Next