Piston Slap: For the Love Of...1982?

Sajeev Mehta
by Sajeev Mehta

TTAC reader Tiburon Guy writes:

Hey Sajeev,

Long time I know: I still have the Hyundai, fixed up and kicking butt. I ditched my 2000 Ford Mustang v6 and bought a 2010 Ranger XLT. No regrets at all: 24 MPG city…come on!

The real reason why i’m responding is I have a question: I always wanted a car from my birth year. (1982) Thing is, the early 80’s weren’t too kind aesthetically on domestics. With a budget of 8-10k, what would you guys suggest that I should get from 82 that looks good, rides better, and won’t leave me broke from maintenance and repairs?

Sajeev answers:

Oh yes! I have the exact same problem with 1983, because three cars I (sorta) claim as my own come from this awesome year. That said, every car from 1982 totally sucks: when compared to a modern Toyota Camry SE in almost every dynamic measure. But I digress…

Problem is, we need more information for a relevant answer. Case in point: I love crappy American iron from this era. Hence a recommendation of my personal favorite: the Fox Body 5.0 Lincoln Continental, trim and lightweight, retro styled and all-new for ’82.

Insane, I know. So, with that in mind, tell us what you’d like in this vehicle: performance, comfort, etc???

William answers:

As a previous owner of a 1988 Crown Vic, I definitely (Panther) Love the 302/5.0. I’d prefer something sporty looking. Fuel economy doesn’t mean much since it’ll be a weekend cruiser. Comfort would be ideal since my wife will be cruising with me. I’d love to keep with the V8 unless there was a turbocharged solution: after riding in my friend’s toyota all-trac celica, i’m addicted to boost. I love the look of classic cars, and the Vette always caught my eye from that year, but I wasn’t fully aware of all the vehicles from that year to choose from.

I definitely want a domestic car. Oh, and an auto is mandatory since the wife will be driving it too.

The kicker, it’s gotta fit in my garage. The garage is just long enough to fit a challenger, so anything longer than that won’t work. Any ideas?

Sajeev Concludes:

I’m still thinking that a Ford Fox Body is the right move. But then again, 1982 was the first year of the 4th Gen F-body, the Camaro and Firebird. I do love me some original K.I.T.T. from the famous TV show of this era. The G-bodies are a good Fox alternative, as the aftermarket fixes many of the problems not obvious in the surprisingly agile and fun Ford. Plus, I grew to not hate the G-body HVAC rattle when you switch from “vent” to A/C. Wait, no I didn’t, I always considered them poor competition to the somewhat better crafted Foxes.

Back to my plan: both the Fox and F-body are domestic, automatic and small compared to modern metal larger than a Honda Fit. And with an overabundance of cheap replacement parts, your garage is set for life. The Corvette isn’t a bad choice, so those three are where I’d stop searching.

Which isn’t exactly an end: it’s time to dig deeper into the Fox and see which body gets your blood boiling. If none, the F-body and Corvette are what’s up. Stick with V8s, anything turbocharged in 1982 will be a serious letdown in stock form.

Bonus! A Piston Slap Nugget of Wisdom:

Any car from 1982 that doesn’t have yards of service receipts and regular exercise will be a money pit. Rubber, gaskets, hoses, gummed up (i.e. oxidized, un-soldered, etc) electronics, weathered plastics, etc. will come together to ruin your plan.

Be okay with that, and don’t be afraid to resto-mod to make it your personal expression from this awesome era. I have a thing for these cars looking completely stock, but with modern levels of engine compression/airflow and period correct suspension/wheel upgrades.

Send your queries to mehta@ttac.com. Spare no details and ask for a speedy resolution if you’re in a hurry.

Sajeev Mehta
Sajeev Mehta

More by Sajeev Mehta

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 85 comments
  • MadHungarian MadHungarian on May 10, 2011

    But for the garage length issue, I would recommend a Buick Electra Estate Wagon. Solid drivetrain with an amazing combination of luxury and utility. Kind of like having a Fleetwood Brougham with a really big trunk. Sadly, an actual Fleetwood Brougham, or any other '82 Cadillac, would be a bad choice. All '82 Cadillacs except the Cimarron came with the horrible HT4100 V8 that was bog-slow until it blew up. And surely you aren't considering a Cimarron!

  • MRF 95 T-Bird MRF 95 T-Bird on May 10, 2011

    From 1982 GM E-Body Toronado, Riviera or Eldorado even though they are luxury cars with lots of electrical stuff, they are quite reliable. GM B-Body 2 drs Delta 88, 98 Regency, Buick LeSabre, Pk Ave GM G-Body Monte, GP, Regal, Cutlass BMW 320i Ford Panther LTD-Crown Vic, Grand Marquis

  • Bob Funny how Oldsmobile was offering a GPS system to help if you were lost, yet GM as a company was very lost. Not really sure that they are not still lost. They make hideous looking trucks, Cadillac is a crappy Chevy pretending to be fancy. To be honest, I would never step in a GM show room now or ever. Boring, cheap ugly and bad resale why bother. I get enough of GM when i rent on trips from airports. I have to say, does anybody at GM ever drive what everyone else drives? Do they ever then look at what crap they put out in style fit and finish? Come on, for real, do they? Cadillac updated slogan should be " sub standard of the 3rd world", or " almost as good as Tata motors". Enough said.
  • Sam Jacobs I want a sedan. When a buy a car or even rent one, I don’t want to ride up high. I don’t want a 5-door. I want a trunk to keep my stuff out of sight. It’s quieter, cars handle better, I don’t need to be at the same height as a truck. I have a 2022 Subaru Legacy Touring XT, best car ever, equipped as a luxury sedan, so quick and quiet. I don’t understand automakers’ decisions to take away sedans or simply stop updating them — giving up the competition. The Camry and Accord should not be our only choices. Impala and Fusion were beautiful when they were axed.
  • Spamvw I think you need to remember WHY the big 2 and 1/2 got out of the car business. Without going political, the CAFE standards signed into law meant unless you had a higher gas mileage fleet, you couldn't meet the standards.The Irony is that, the law made sedans so small with low roof lines, that normal people migrated to SUV's and Trucks. Now we get worse mileage than before.
  • TheEndlessEnigma Somehow, Toyota, Honda, Hyundai/Kia and Mazda are able to build sedans in North America AND turn a profit on those sedans at the same time.
  • Tane94 There definitely is demand for sedans and history will condemn Ford, GM and Stellantis for abandoning the segment. Hyundai/Kia/Genesis and Honda, Toyota, Nissan continue to invest in their sedans and redesign the models.
Next