Capsule Review: 2009 Mercedes-Benz C300 Sport (Manual)

by Mike Solowiow

Published: January 22nd, 2009

capsule review 2009 mercedes benz c300 sport manual

Our illustrious Editor-in-Chief predicts the death of the manual transmission. The “stick-shift is toast,” Farago says, in his own special way. I disagree. If you want to go fast, get a paddle shift automated manual, a la Nissan GT-R. Time and again, the little levers have proven to be the fastest way to get around a track. Want easy breezy beautiful Orange County commuting? Get a traditional automatic. But if you want to maximize the man machine interface, nothing beats a manual. Three pedals can enliven the most leaden of automobiles. To wit: the Mercedes-Benz C300 Sport.

The current gen C’s sheetmetal is wedgy and attractive in a Brunhilda sorta way, complete with bucktooth tri-star emblem. The C marks a return to classic Mercedes’ design language and uberholprestige proportions– with a bit of bling for the boyz. The C300’s inside is a stark tribute to the best of German interiors: finest quality construction matched to minimalist ergonomics, blah blah blah. I wouldn’t have sampled this car if it weren’t the only brand spanking new manual transmission-equipped C300 in the entirety of Dallas. Or Texas, for all I know.

Guiding the Benz out of the car park onto Lemmon Ave, the engine’s improved responsiveness was immediately apparent. With a stick to summon the six, the powerplant pours on the power, smoothly, o demand. No torque converter guessing. No waiting to see what the automatic will do. No Novocaine injection. The C300 practically leaped away from the intersection, displaying the sort of verve even the more powerful C350 can’t produce. The engine growled seductively, then hummed placidly as I heel-n-toed the downshift (perfect pedal placement). If it weren’t for the long transmission throw, the German box car’s transmission would be perfect.

In fact, the Merc suddenly ceased to be a velour track-suited sorority girl’s dream. It became a lithe driving machine to rival the legendary BMW.

Just kidding. The C-Class can’t match the 3-Series’s rightly legendary driving dynamics. But the manual Merc is a more versatile beast. Here you haff a half-sized sports sedan offering sporting fun: a row-your-own corner carver that rewards and challenges when the going gets twisty. And then, when you want to kick back and chillax in your own little world of entry-level wealth, the C300 is just the pill you need. The stick shift is dead. Long live the stick shift!

Mike Solowiow

More by Mike Solowiow

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 50 comments

Netrun on Jan 23, 2009

I am a huge fan of the new M-B C class so any new review on it makes me happy! I am also a huge fan of manual equipped cars. That said, sometimes it sucks to have a manual. One time I was in a 2 mile long traffic jam at a border crossing. The problem was that the road inclined up and then crossed a bridge. Ugh. This is why I like the idea of the automatic manuals - no clutch. Unfortunately, the execution has yet to match the beauty of the idea.

Like Reply
Corcoran on Jan 24, 2009

I've owned a 6-spd manual C300 Sport for a year now and received a heavy discount because nobody was interested in a C-Class with a clutch. During that time I've put 13,000 trouble-free miles on the car and admittedly I am surprised how much I like the Mercedes 6-speed. Previously I've owned a number of manual transmission BMWs including an E36 M3 and 540. BMW still has the best manuals in the business, but the C300's gearbox is noticeably improved compared to previous generation Mercedes manuals I've driven. Had my car been a C63 I would've had no problems with the AMG-spec automatic - but with only 225+ horsepower, the manual transmission helps considerably as TTAC described. Would I buy one again? Probably. My only complaints are the Continental tires and the transmission doesn't feel as stout as the BMW. Other than that I think it looks better than the BMW 335, has great ergonomics and the nav/stereo interface is perfect (minus the need for touch-screen).

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Joe65688619 I agree there should be more sedans, but recognize the trend. There's still a market for performance oriented-drivers. IMHO a low budget sedan will always be outsold by a low budget SUV. But a sports sedan, or a well executed mid-level sedan (the Accord and Camry) work. Smaller market for large sedans except I think for an older population. What I'm hoping to see is some consolidation across brands - the TLX for example is not selling well, but if it was offered only in the up-level configurations it would not be competing with it's Honda sibling. I know that makes the market smaller and niche, but that was the original purpose of the "luxury" brands - badge-engineering an existing platform at a relatively lower cost than a different car and sell it with a higher margin for buyers willing and able to pay for them. Also creates some "brand cachet." But smart buyers know that simple badging and slightly better interiors are usually not worth the cost. Put the innovative tech in the higher-end brands first, differentiate they drivetrain so it's "better" (the RDX sells well for Acura, same motor and tranmission, added turbo which makes a notable difference compared to the CRV). The sedan in many Western European countries is the "family car" as opposed to micro and compact crossovers (which still sell big, but can usually seat no more than a compact sedan).
Jonathan IMO the hatchback sedans like the Audi A5 Sportback, the Kia Stinger, and the already gone Buick Sportback are the answer to SUVs. The A5 and the AWD version of the Stinger being the better overall option IMO. I drive the A5, and love the depth and size of the trunk space as well as the low lift over. I've yet to find anything I need to carry that I can't, although I admit I don't carry things like drywall, building materials, etc. However, add in the fun to drive handling characteristics, there's almost no SUV that compares.
C-b65792653 I'm starting to wonder about Elon....again!!I see a parallel with Henry Ford who was the wealthiest industrialist at one time. Henry went off on a tangent with the peace ship for WWI, Ford TriMotor, invasive social engineering, etc. Once the economy went bad, the focus fell back to cars. Elon became one of the wealthiest industrialist in the 21st century. Then he went off with the space venture, boring holes in the ground venture, "X" (formerly Twitter), etc, etc, etc. Once Tesla hit a plateau and he realized his EVs were a commodity, he too is focused on his primary money making machine. Yet, I feel Elon is over reacting. Down sizing is the nature of the beast in the auto industry; you can't get around that. But hacking the Super Charger division is like cutting off your own leg. IIRC, GM and Ford were scheduled to sign on to the exclusive Tesla charging format. That would have doubled or tripled his charging opportunity. I wonder what those at the Renaissance Center and the Glass House are thinking now. As alluded to, there's blood in the water and other charging companies will fill the void. I believe other nations have standardized EV charging (EU & China). Elon had the chance to have his charging system as the default in North America. Now, he's dropped the ball. He's lost considerable influence on what the standardized format will eventually be. Tremendous opportunity lost. 🚗🚗🚗
Tassos I never used winter tires, and the last two decades I am driving almost only rear wheel drive cars, half of them in MI. I always bought all season tires for them, but the diff between touring and non touring flavors never came up. Does it make even the smallest bit of difference? (I will not read the lengthy article because I believe it does not).
Lou_BC ???