Subaru Forester XS LL Bean Review

Admin
by Admin

Subaru has remained 'willfully odd' for eons. The Japanese brand's long-held construction tenets– horizontally-opposed powerplants, all-wheel-drive and eccentric styling– have only recently been embraced by the masses. Okay, so America's roads aren't exactly awash in boxer-engines, but controversial styling is certainly making a resurgence, and we all know how that AWD car/truck thing worked out. Most manufacturers now have at least one car-based 'cute ute' in their showrooms, from Honda's CR-V to the Saturn Vue and Hyundai's roly-poly new Tucson.

With the massive success of its Outback lineup, it comes as no surprise that Subaru decided to fit some lifts and extra-tall glazing on its Impreza platform in search of a few more sales. The resulting Forester is an enigmatic little toolbox with many charms, but an unclear role in the family constellation.

Our L.L. Bean-spec XS tester arrived in 'Woodland Green,' a verdant hue well-suited to the vehicle's boxy angularity and inner-hippy ethos. While the XS is hardly exciting enough to command an adolescent's wall space, it's the most convincing Forester iteration yet. This is particularly true up front, where furrowed-brow headlamps and large fog lamps forge a strong first impression. The aggressive visage compliments the usual off-the-rack SUV telltales: ribbed lower cladding, blistered fenders and a roof rack atop its Popemobile greenhouse.

Despite its butch posturing, the Forester struggles to shake off the dreaded 'station wagon' persona. The SUV boasts above-average ground clearance, yet remains visibly shorter than most everything else in its class (a result of its low beltline/high glass quotient). It's the Chrysler 300 School of Design overturned: big greenhouse, narrow band of sheet metal.

Inside, the Forester's 'granola-liberal' heritage makes nice with the upwardly-mobile L.L. Bean specification. In the main, this juxtaposition pleases (luxuriously practical wipe-clean heated leather seats above industrial-grade rubber mats), but occasionally chafes (the stereo musters better weather band reception than basic FM). The XS' panoramic sunroof is its best model-specific feature: a homecoming queen's dream. The Forester's rear seats are a bit tight for the long-stemmed, but the overall ergonomics are sound, the panel fitments spot-on and most materials seem ready to go the distance.

Unfortunately, the driver's helm must be ratcheted to its top station to obtain the full-on SUV driving position so prized by desperate housewives. The resulting perch makes for an awkward seating position and places the Forester's low beltline in the middle of the driver's comfort zone. The apparent lack of lateral protection creates a disconcerting sense of vulnerability that belies the Forester's NHTSA's five-star acclaim– a conundrum best mitigated by adopting a lower personal center of gravity.

If the Forester's height fails to pay psychological dividends, at least it keeps the vehicle's mass low in the chassis. The XS can make short work of everything from rugged trails to the morning commute to undulating twisties– without making its driver feel tipsy. A fully independent suspension, symmetrical all-wheel drive and rear limited-slip differential contribute to the vehicle's class-leading handling. The steering is a skosh light, but acceptably accurate given the rather compromised sixteen-inch Yokohama Geolandars that connect it to the road.

Sadly, goading our green Bean failed to reveal any potential for WRC-style hooliganism. The blame falls squarely upon the XS' drivetrain. Plugging a 165-horse 2.5-liter into an intrinsically pudgy SUV isn't exactly a recipe for rapidity– especially when power routs through a four-speed automatic. The setup can propel the Forester at a reasonable clip, but the drivetrain must work hard (and loud) to achieve anything approaching genuine velocity. This is particularly true on the climb, when laden with kin and kit. The Forester's flat-four has an interesting acoustic signature, but sporting drivers will still wish for a little less conversation and a little more action.

The Forester's most troublesome aspect is its lack of brake feel; the left pedal on this L.L. was as spongy as a certain square-trousered cartoon icon. Around town the situation is a sour footnote. In fast technical sequences, when proper modulation becomes a far more pressing issue, the Forester's brakes ultimately retard much of the goodwill its suspension engenders. In the SUV's defense, simulated straight-line panic stops remain short and true, courtesy standard anti-lock control and electronic brake force distribution.

Fortunately, the Forester XT solves most these gripes with its significantly more powerful turbocharged engine and [available] manual transmission. Pistonheads may also wish to note that Fuji Heavy's upsized-for-'05 Outback XT Wagon boasts even greater grunt and better handing both on AND off the bitumen. In fact, unless you're attracted to whatever driveway cachet the L.L. Bean badge affords, either alternative is a better choice. Maybe that's just Subaru being willfully odd again– perhaps they like being their own toughest competitor.

Admin
Admin

More by Admin

Comments
Join the conversation
 1 comment
  • Sandralorrain Sandralorrain on Sep 25, 2016

    This was such a good read! My husband and I just bought our first Subaru Forester (a dream car) 2005 LLBean. (Yes, it's 2016 and the newer models are well, new and shiny but when you're kinda "young, broke, and fabulous" (recommended reading) it's financially prudent to purchase used :)) I love how the Subaru has remained 'willfully odd', and I love "the vehicle's boxy angularity and inner-hippy ethos". We got what they had on the lot: gold w/ beige interior. Of course I wanted a sage green or some kind of cool olive green I saw on the road the other day---but I am happy with our 'willfully odd' looking family car.

  • Varezhka I have still yet to see a Malibu on the road that didn't have a rental sticker. So yeah, GM probably lost money on every one they sold but kept it to boost their CAFE numbers.I'm personally happy that I no longer have to dread being "upgraded" to a Maxima or a Malibu anymore. And thankfully Altima is also on its way out.
  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
  • GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
  • Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
  • Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.
Next